Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

Microsoft Office Tries Tempting with a $39.99 'Lifetime License'` (popsci.com) 164

From the world of proprietary software comes this report by Popular Science. "Despite the increasing number of more economical options (read also: free) on the market, many people still prefer Microsoft Office over the alternatives available..."

"The only setback? A license can be expensive, especially if you're the one shouldering the fees instead of your company. If you wish to have access to the suite for personal use, you either have to pay recurring fees for a subscription or cough up hundreds in one go for an annual license."

Sounds pretty rough. But through Thursday they're at least getting a temporary price drop: If none of these options appeal to you, maybe this Microsoft Office Home and Business: Lifetime License deal can. For our Deals Day sale, you can grab it on sale for only $39.99 — no coupon needed. This bundle is designed for families, students, and small businesses who want unlimited access to MS Office apps and email without breaking the bank. The license package includes programs you already likely use on the regular, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, and OneNote.

Upon purchase, you get access to your software license keys and download links instantly. You also get free updates for life across all programs, along with free customer service that offers the best support in case any of the apps run into trouble. The best part? You only have to pay once and you're set for life. The Microsoft Office Home and Business: Lifetime License normally goes for $349, but from today until July 14, you can get it for only $39.99 thanks to the special Deals Day event. Click here for Mac and here for Windows.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Office Tries Tempting with a $39.99 'Lifetime License'`

Comments Filter:
  • $39.99 per PC (Score:5, Insightful)

    by John Allsup ( 987 ) <slashdot@nospam.chalisque.net> on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:38PM (#62688334) Homepage Journal

    I have multiple PCs, for one thing, so I think I'll stick with Libreoffice.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by thegarbz ( 1787294 )

      If you already have Libreoffice, why even bother posting? Even TFS says this is for people who don't consider the appeal of free alternatives.

      • Re:$39.99 per PC (Score:5, Informative)

        by GoTeam ( 5042081 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:47PM (#62688374)
        I think the point was that the $39.99 is per PC. I didn't see that part listed in the summary, so Mr Allsup was likely pointing that out.
      • by phalse phace ( 454635 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:06PM (#62688446)

        If you already have Libreoffice, why even bother posting?

        To get First Post! Duh!

        • You're better off aiming for Libre post instead. Libreoffice is many excellent things, but performant is not one of them.

          In case anyone is wondering, yes, I use Libreoffice. The only MS Office component I still use on occasion is Excel '97. It really is just a joy to use, to me it is the absolute peak of functionality:bloat ratio (and I first actively used 1-2-3 on DOS, so I know efficiency — it would run in less than 640k. I only touched viscalc once...)

      • This is the thing though, MS Office has a long history of format lock in, those free alternatives don't exist for lock-in situations.

        For people who need a license because they bring work home, this may be appealing, or some people who have to interact with clients who are locked in to an MS environment.

        Maybe they're just pointing out that the majority of people have access to LO, and if you don't already, then you should start using it.

        • It's nice and all to be idealistic like that, but reality will bite sooner or later. I've got a job interview coming up (4th in a series) where I have to give a live presentation for an hour demonstrating past projects I've done. They'll also need a copy of the PowerPoint file.

          There's no guarantee that what LO outputs will actually load on their computers. The company I'm applying for is no joke and the competition for jobs there is quite stiff, with very few people even making it this far. You really think

          • If I was asked to give a live presentation for an hour demonstrating past projects, I'd turn down the job. That sounds like HR bureocracy gone crazy. Who would want to work for a firm that asked you to do that, and you weren't even getting paid for it?

            No, I suspect that the "presentation" is just so that they can pick your brains for ideas and steal them.

            • Absolutely. They don't need an hour to figure out if you can give a presentation. But an hour on the stuff you're most proud you've done lately might be useful intelligence.

              • Absolutely. They don't need an hour to figure out if you can give a presentation. But an hour on the stuff you're most proud you've done lately might be useful intelligence.

                This is a two way street with waste on both sides. Companies that want outsider ideas and not invest in training/research/development sounds toxic and I don't think intelligence theft will get them far if they can't invest in people to implement and maintain.

            • The fact they want a copy of the presentation is also worrying. If what they are trying to ascertain is if you can give a good presentation, then that is "in the moment" and not your PP file. Fishy.
          • > You really think I'd want to risk using anything other than MS PowerPoint for that?

            I remember LO having some sweet GL slide transitions. Would make your presentation more memorable if that's the way they work.

            Ask a friend if a simple LO file loads ok in their MS - it should at least import ok there was a legal file format ruling around this. The problems normally start when you go the other way, from MS to LO.

            Have a play with transitions if you haven't already and good luck with the interview process.

    • by clovis ( 4684 )

      Agreed on the Libreoffice option.

      However, if you're considering building a Windows machine(s) in the near future, they have Windows 11 Pro for $34.99
      https://www.microsoftkeys.net/... [microsoftkeys.net]

    • Arguing about the merits of LibreOffice is missing the fact that this is not an authorized Microsoft Seller (verified with Microsoft tech support). This offer is most likely not legit. Checking the domain also gives several sites warning of a low trust score. I'm concerned that this offer has been given a shout-out via Slashdot that it is legitimate. The header and body of this article needs to change to warn users vs. advertise this product.
  • life of what? and will it end being tied to an other buy later one?
    must be online?

    • by Spazmania ( 174582 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:11PM (#62688466) Homepage

      Life of the particular windows installation on the particular machine. Reinstall or upgrade and you're out of luck.

      Personally, I prefer Microsoft Office... 2003. The modern Office sucks.

      • by narcc ( 412956 )

        I still run MSO 2007. I upgraded from Office XP just for the new file formats. I haven't had a reason to upgrade sense.

      • by sixminuteabs ( 1452973 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:50PM (#62688568)
        Anyone who prefers Office 2003 should just run Libre. I mean, if 2 decades of improvement and new services isnâ(TM)t interesting to you that sounds just like open source anyway. In other news, I find Tesla uninteresting and do not think cars have improved since my 2003 Toyota Camry.
        • by Ecuador ( 740021 )

          I am usually running Office 2003 in an old Windows XP VM under Fusion when I want to use Excel comfortably. I am on a Mac and both MS Excel 2019 and LibreOffice are much slower and even buggy in comparison, even if they are running nativelly.

          • On that point, why has Excel been so bad in the last decade? I hate using it in Mac. It's just so unpredictability buggy.

            And even on Windows, it seems to be calculating the next largest Prime for every little thing. I now have a stupid shortcut for replacing formulas with values just to have a sane experience.

            • by v1 ( 525388 )

              Well, every update fixes all the bugs, you just get NEW BUGS. Then it's a mini-game to figure out what's broke in THIS update.

              At least that's been MY experience. It's like the ol "don't like the weather? wait an hour!" trope. Don't lke the bug? Run updates, and see if you like the new bugs instead? (and once you find an update that has only bugs you can tolerate, maybe just never update again!)

        • Get this, someone on Slashdot thinks Microsoft has IMPROVED Office.
          "Now works with other apps, rearranged icons, and has a eyedropper to grab colors like everyone other program has on the planet."

          Only 1% of the public uses those extra power features. And, if the documents were compatible, I'd consider the NON-ribbon version of office an upgrade in usability. I've given up finding where the change case button is to be found and just use that search bar for it.

      • by rabidR04CH ( 9810182 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @05:04PM (#62688744)
        I had to reinstall the operating system once after purchasing this kind of installation from BleepingComputer and it allowed me to do so. The software's license key is attached to my Microsoft account and the software can be downloaded from within the Windows Store.
    • Life of that version of Office. This is basically a discount version of the boxed version Microsoft sells. It doesn't get the drip feed of feature updates like Office 365, just bugfixes and security updates. It'll keep working even after that date, but it becomes increasingly unwise to do so the longer it's been, just like any unmaintained software.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:39PM (#62688338)

    "The best part? You only have to pay once and you're set for life. " Not completely true.
    Can only install this 1 time. Can never reinstall, recover from crash, move to different machine. read the fine print

    • by umopapisdn69 ( 6522384 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:26PM (#62688508)
      First I need to clarify, I am highly in favor of free software and the Free Software movement. I believe it should be encouraged and supported. But that doesn't make commercial software companies inherently evil. Profit motivated, but not always evil. Microsoft and Apple are nowhere near the scale of evil that google and facebook are. MS and Apple at least primarily sell actual real end user products, instead of selling just the users themselves. I get very tired though of people who turn Free Software into a cult. Please show me this "fine print" along with a source URL, where it says you'll never be able to reinstall this software again. This is a perpetual license purchase. As such, it is virtually certain to permit reinstall, transfer and activation to a new machine, etc. according to some procedure terms. The real "catch" here is this is a license for Office =2021=. The MAJOR differences vs the O365 subscription are: 1. This is a one time payment, not an annual subscription. In that respect it's a far lower cost deal. 2. I'm confident those "updates for life" are only UPDATES (bug fixes and security patches presumably) - for Office 2021. Doubtless those will not include VERSION UPGRADES as new versions are released. Odds are there will soon be a new perpetual license version, and this is a typical closeout sale to clear warehouse inventory of the physical products. None of this is really anything very new. The most "evil" thing I spotted when I followed the purchase link on my phone is the sale site had a countdown timer claiming the $39.99 deal would be expiring in 20, 19, 18, etc minutes, and might go up to $49.99 shortly. Though the article itself is clear that price is good until July 14. Blame for that dark pattern "Supplies are limited, hurry and buy NOW. Operators are standing by!" gimmick is on Popular Science, and their marketing/sales partner. Not on Microsoft.
      • If you think Microsoft has not been similarly evil compared to Google or Facebook, you've not been paying attention long enough. Before the browser wars, which could have left Microsoft on top in a very ugly way, Microsoft already killed and obstructed the competition in a way that set back the industry perhaps a decade. It ain't done until Lotus won't run, dirty tricks to kill WordPerfect and more. After the browser wars came the whole SCO versus Linux affair, sponsored by Microsoft. They also had their gu
        • Perhaps it's a different company now, but I'm not forgetting two decades of misbehaviour for just a few years of not being terribly evil...

          Course you don't. That's why people still don't trust IBM or Germany. Motto:"Never forget, never forgive".

      • that doesn't make commercial software companies inherently evil. Profit motivated, but not always evil.

        Some would say that was the same thing. We used to call them Christians, but these days most Christians seem to believe that economic success is proof that God loves them.

        Microsoft and Apple are nowhere near the scale of evil that google and facebook are.

        Microsoft set computing back a decade with FUD wars and lawsuits against Linux, notably by funding post-tech patent troll SCO Group. Their core user-facing product Microsoft Windows is literally the worst spyware [networkworld.com] in existence. Microsoft and Apple are both, willingly or not, part of the PRISM [wikipedia.org] warrantless citizen spying program. Apple exerci

    • by Espectr0 ( 577637 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @04:50PM (#62688710) Journal

      your comment is false. microsoft allows you to transfer the license (as long as it's not an OEM license) to another computer. they deactivate the installation on the previous computer

      source: i had to call ms last week to do this as i purchased a new laptop

      • by sconeu ( 64226 )

        Yeah, that's the problem. You have to f***ing CALL them. There's absolutely no reason to force that. You should be able to do that online through your MS account page.

    • Install, image the machine. Problem solved. If crash, then re-install OS (and Orifice) from image.
  • by sinij ( 911942 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:40PM (#62688344)
    I am not interested renting software for personal use, especially when plenty of good-enough open-source alternatives are available. As to Microsoft's Lifetime* offers, we all know it is a trap.
    • by GoTeam ( 5042081 )
      This isn't saas. It's word games to make us feel like Microsoft is being customer friendly, when it ain't.
      • by sinij ( 911942 )
        Please explain how paying reoccurring fees for Office 365 is not SaaS.
        • by ceoyoyo ( 59147 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:01PM (#62688432)

          It's a lifetime license. There's no recurring fee. Microsoft has rediscovered software as a product. Except it's a new and improved product that doesn't require actually making anything physical and does depend on the whims of Microsoft's activation servers.

          It also doesn't seem super unusual. Looks like they had a very similar sale in April.

        • Please explain how paying reoccurring fees for Office 365 is not SaaS.

          It clearly states it's a "Lifetime" license where you only have to pay one.

          Summary even states "You only have to pay once and you're set for life."

          • by caseih ( 160668 )

            Of course by "lifetime" they don't mean your lifetime. They mean the lifetime of the Windows install you put it on. One-time install only.

        • This isn't Office 365, it's a discount version of the periodic releases they put out that's like the old pre-Office 365 waterfall-style releases.

    • Yeah, this sounds like a trap to get your documents locked up into the Office 365 ecosystem. Lord knows that shit isn't free, and they'll be charging you for document storage for the rest of YOUR lifetime.

  • by AmazingRuss ( 555076 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:43PM (#62688354)
    ... then I thought, 'I haven't needed any of those apps for 15 years, and they should pay ME to download outlook.'
    • Yup. Over the past decade +, the only times I've needed Word or Excel were all work-related - and that's just because someone at work used Microsoft Office to generate some document or another. In any case, work-related means it's my employer's responsibility to pay for any "necessary" software.

      At home, the free options work great. I can use the Apple alternatives (Pages and Numbers), or I can use LibreOffice. I can't say I've ever felt "gosh, I sure wish I could use Word or Excel instead of this software".

      • Same here.

        Of course I use LO at home (in Linux), but all my users at work are also doing the same. Once in a blue moon we get something that doesn't look or act right. And usually it just doesn't matter. And most of that time it is not the fault of LO, but because the document was just horribly designed or had freaky non-included fonts. Once I just Emailed the sender asking them to send their mucked-up PowerPoint to us as PDF.

  • Microsoft Office Tries Tempting with a $39.99 'Lifetime License'` good only for the lifetime of THAT version.

    FTFY

    • It'll keep working even after Microsoft moves it to EOL status, it just becomes increasingly unwise to do so because there won't be any more security patches issued. It's not like as soon as the clock ticks over to the date it goes EOL it will instantly stop working.

      • Whether it'll be a bad idea to keep on using is not clear. Once almost everyone moves on to a new version, there are likely to be fewer attacks on the old version. Probably in between there is a period when the old version is used by enough people but not maintained and hence an attractive target, but if you can wait that period out, it then may well be safer than using new stuff.

  • Donation (Score:5, Funny)

    by dwillmore ( 673044 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:47PM (#62688370)

    Hmm, all of a sudden I feel like donating $40 to the LibreOffice people.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. I use their stuff (or LaTeX) wherever I can anyways.

      • I donated. I've never done that for them before, so it was long overdue. I was hoping there would be a way to attach a note to the donation so I could tell them why and maybe someone there would get a chuckle, but there wasn't.

        But the important part was that it will help them further their projects.

      • by bn-7bc ( 909819 )
        While latex is great, i wish it had a wysiwyg gui ( don 't know if this is possible, i think this would getba lot of people to drop word, and documents would probably look a lot better
        • by gweihir ( 88907 )

          There are some, but I have no idea how good they are. I am completely fine on the CLI. I have used Word RTF export and RTF2LATEX to produce documents that do not look typeset by an incompetent. Needs some manual work though. But MS Office is really the "under-3" wannabe version of text processing: Ugly results, hard to use, slow, bad features and (WTH?) frigging security problems!

        • by hazem ( 472289 )

          I regularly use Gummi for basic Latex. It's not pure GUI, but you get near-instant rendering of your changes: https://gummi.app/ [gummi.app]

          I've also hear people like TexMaker (https://www.xm1math.net/texmaker/) and TexWorks (https://tug.org/texworks/).

  • A deal that is good as long as Microsoft decides to honor it! Here fishy, fishies here is the bait, trust Us! Microsoft like most of big tech "Is not to be trusted" ever!
    • Well, for the last couple iterations of Office, Microsoft has intimated "this may be the last time we release a stand-alone version". A "lifetime upgrades" offer is meaningless if they never release a new version of the software.

  • by Catvid-22 ( 9314307 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:50PM (#62688384)
    Nothing to see or read here. Clearly it's an advertorial [wikipedia.org]. For once I actually read the article, and it's practically the summary. Or is that the other way around?
    • I was thinking that. At least on sites like The Register they clearly mark it when it's a paid article. Thought /. used to do that, but maybe someone goofed or they changed the policy.

    • Nothing to see or read here.

      What do you mean nothing to see or read? Check the comments. There is an amazing and rich discussion going on about the practices of license transfer, the meaning of lifetime licenses, alternative products, benefits and downsides of different options.

      If you're not here for the comments then WTF do you read Slashdot at all? If you are here for the comments, then this "advertorial" is providing content for a nice rich discussion well worth participating in.

      http://www.zdnet.com/ [zdnet.com] - There's a link for you if yo

  • MS can simply "improve" Office along the same lines they have for the last decade or so and in a few years, it will be completely unusable. Then they bring out, say, office 2007 under a new name and your "lifetime" licence is a complete joke.

  • by diffract ( 7165501 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:53PM (#62688394)
    Why does it link to popsci, whatever that is? Is this legit?
  • Microsoft has determined that they can maximize profit by moving everything online and charging you for access. It seems unlikely this is going to change in the long run.

    There will be a catch - it's tied to a combination of hardware hashes so if you change anything about your computer it voids the agreement, you get 'main line' updates only and they introduce a 'format upgrade' that isn't in the main line so you become incompatible with everyone else, etc.

    I simply don't believe them when they say this lice

    • I simply don't believe them when they say this license will be honored for your lifetime.

      I fully believe the license will be honored for your lifetime. I also fully believe that this version of the software has already have planned obsolescence build into it to make it practically useless after a few years. At that point, the lifetime license is useless, and they are hoping you have become so deeply reliant upon it that you will switch the the subscription version.

      This is nothing more than a plan to increase subscription revenue. Think of this as the promotional version that softens you up for

  • ... many people still prefer Microsoft Office over the alternatives available.

    I have a lot of files in Publisher (2010) and, as far as I can tell, all the alternatives do a non-existent to very poor job of importing these files, so that's a sticking point for me. All my other Word/Excel files are few and/or uncomplicated enough that I can easily re-work them in something else, like LibreOffice.

    My most complicated file is my multi-sheet, personal budget/financial-tracking spreadsheet that's still in Lotus 123 (v9.8 from SmartSuite) -- which runs fine on Windows 10, btw. That will

    • I'm a Windows techie by trade but I've flipped everything - including my servers - over to Linux. Mostly Ubuntu.

      I doubt this will be the Year of the Linux Desktop, but it's entirely practical for the home user now. Corporate desktops will mostly remain Windows so long as so many developers have their apps dependent on that environment. You know, those same devs who require their apps to run with full Admin rights with IE available, because why even try to do things right?

      • Nowadays when people create applications, they're typically web apps. The exceptions are generally engineering, design, medical, and industrial. They typically don't have these issues though.

        The ones you're talking about are typically made in China, who doesn't seem to have even one talented UX designer amongst the whole billion of them.

    • by ledow ( 319597 )

      Get your files out of Publisher.

      Seriously. It's not 1998 any more.

      • Get your files out of Publisher.
        Seriously. It's not 1998 any more.

        Trust me, easier said than done. Luckily, it's mostly greeting cards I've made for friends/family, so not critical that they port, but a lot work went into them over the years... Also Publisher has really good paper handling for folds, etc ... Not sure what you mean by the 1998 comparison, but while even the 2010 version may be old, it still works really, really well for things like cards.

  • by im_thatoneguy ( 819432 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:02PM (#62688436)

    Microsoft: "Here is an $89/year subscription. It includes 6TB of cloud storage, a couple hours of international skype calls per month and premium email. You can install it on up to 30 computers."

    Slashdot: "Fuck off with your cloud subscriptions I want perpetual licenses!"

    Microsoft: "Here is a $39 one time purchase for just the software but without any cloud storage."

    Slashdot: "OMG Read the fine print! This is just a single license! If you want to move it from a PC to a Mac you have to repurchase it! You won't get upgrades to the latest versions!"

    Yes... that's how your precious perpetual licenses have always worked.

    • by narcc ( 412956 )

      Yes... that's how your precious perpetual licenses have always worked.

      Nonsense. I've had no trouble moving MSO from one computer to another. At the absolute worst, it takes a 5-minute phone call.

      • Nonsense. I've had no trouble moving MSO from one computer to another. At the absolute worst, it takes a 5-minute phone call.

        Not sure why you say nonsense. That's literally how MS licenses have worked since the Windows XP days. You're vehemently agreeing with the OP will claiming his post is nonsense.

    • by bn-7bc ( 909819 )
      Fire retardant biochem suit on - ok now that the terrible joke is out of the way
      As hirride as hw licence dongles where ( prone to being list too), the at keast made transfering licenses from computer to computer somewhat easy, and not reluant on the tech support person beliving that this is really a transfer to a new system etc. Maybe that would be an idea.0. And since thst dingle also can include a bit of flash any special driver needed could be on the device itself so no download or driver media to be l
    • I had purchased a copy of office for my Mac in the early 2000's. It worked reasonably, well, and moved it from Mac to Mac over the years. Since it is 32 bit, it no longer works. Reasonable.

      This is how software used to be. If I reading the /comments correct, this is not the case for this. It is tied to a single computer. If I upgrade, it is gone. Not the same.
      • No. MS licenses are transferable. You're reading comments correctly, people here are just idiots.

        By the way did you completely uninstall the Office from your previous Mac before moving it to your new machine? If not then you were in breach of the terms of the license. If yes, then you'll have no problem here either you just need to contact MS to enable the move since the licenses status is now checked (precisely because people felt entitled to not stick with the license agreements in the past).

  • Why do I need MS Office again?

    • >"Why do I need MS Office again?"

      To create and send files to others, just proprietary enough to try and force everyone else to also buy and use MS-Office :)

  • by Fly Swatter ( 30498 ) on Saturday July 09, 2022 @04:35PM (#62688672) Homepage
    I don't see it except through a bunch of third party stores.
  • This just in, Microsoft finds it hard to compete when they loose their megapoly
    • My first reaction was, "I should get this in a hurry." But then I thought, I haven't used MSO in years, am happy with LibreOffice, and before that, StarOffice. So why waste money on MSO? All my computers in the last many years have LO on them, Linux, Winders, and Mac. I'm happier with that than I was with my previously free or discounted MSO.
    • I happen to love LibreOffice. It is fantastic. However, I need some of the office programs to be compatible with school so I took advantage of the offer.
  • If I re-install my PC do I still have the lifetime license? If I upgrade to a new desktop, can I carry this with me?

  • One I am typing this on could croak a week later for all I know and then I am out $70/year regular price if I like the features vs Google Docs and other free or pay once solutions. This is on the right track, even at say $100/pc long term, just needs some refinement. I wish Adobe creative cloud also offered per PC lifetime license at somewhat predictable prices. It would be great to be able to budget for software when purchasing new hardware.

  • What I need is a 1-time payment, non-subscription license for iPad. So annoying to have it for every other platform but have to subscribe to edit the same files with the same program on one single platform. I current use another app as a workaround that seems to understand and work with Word files well, so far at least - "WPS Office". But just want one consistent experience across platforms without having to pay subscriptions, which I personally consider to be the devil.
  • Where can I click to close this commercial?
  • by Tom ( 822 )

    Which lifetime, though? My lifetime? Microsofts lifetime? The lifetime of this specific product? The computer I've installed it on? The activation servers? Oh look, it's not what you think it is... oh look over there, a three-headed monkey! Don't mind the fine print, it's bad for your eyes...

  • I can run it on the windows 10 install which was sold to me as 'the last windows version, it will just be updated forever'.
    Thus, either :
    a) my OS and Office suite needs are solved in perpetuity
    or
    b) sales and marketing are lying weasels

  • Will it work on Win7? What about Linux?

    In the future will you be required to have an increasingly higher Win Version
    to get updates?

    This may not be as free as it appears, if you are required to purchase increasingly higher versions of some associated software (like an OS or something else they might tie to the office-upgrade ability.

    Unless they support Win7, which many people still use, then predict future versions to only be supported on future versions of Win....

    Not really "free", if tied to new OS that

  • by dalosla ( 2568583 ) on Sunday July 10, 2022 @07:01AM (#62689958)

    There is discussion on SlickDeals. One poster said:

    I think you don't understand the difference between the various Office products. Office Professional Plus is only sold by Microsoft through volume licensing to large organizations. It is never sold directly to consumers. This seller bought volume licensing keys and is reselling them in violation of Microsoft's terms of use. The fact that they tell you to activate the product within 30 days is a HUGE red flag. Legitimate retail keys can be activated at any time.

  • by careysb ( 566113 ) on Sunday July 10, 2022 @04:39PM (#62691460)

    I just plopped $40+, got a key, and MS rejected it. "Contact the seller". How come others didn't have a problem? What do I do now?

Enzymes are things invented by biologists that explain things which otherwise require harder thinking. -- Jerome Lettvin

Working...