Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Let's Just Recap (Score 1) 169

Maybe you didn't read the post I replied to...
The original post points out the path that got us to our current situation (tariffs needing to be refunded). They correctly point out that the relief will stop with the company receiving compensation for the money they paid in tariffs. A consumer who made a purchase during that time will not receive relief. The consumer can decide not to use products from that business in the future, but that doesn't really resolve anything, does it? I pointed out that we have a system set up to protect companies. Lastly, a random knob pops up to point out that the supreme court can't possibly distribute funds to anyone injured "downstream" from the disaster.
Did I say the supreme court needed to provide downstream relief, or did you imagine that so you could pop off with some obvious point?

Slashdot Top Deals

The use of anthropomorphic terminology when dealing with computing systems is a symptom of professional immaturity. -- Edsger Dijkstra

Working...