Can do!

We're all GOING TO DIE!!!!

On the positive side, consumption based emissions in the US have been dropping since 2005. You can argue that more should be done, but we can't act like we aren't doing anything. You could even make a case that temperatures on earth have been rising since we started cutting emissions.

Wild! You're saying that 17 countries with economies based in large part on fossil fuels didn't agree to sabotage their own economies??!!

We may not like that they won't ruin their economies to save the planet, but it shouldn't be surprising.

Again, either the article (the actual article, not the summary) is leaving out important information, or this is going to be a hard case to win for the plaintiffs.

So that requires the definition of the FCRA

My point was that the article mentions nothing about running a credit report. Either the article left that part out for some weird reason, or these two plaintiffs are trying to say that any third party report gathering information without the consent of the applicant qualifies as a credit report. I'm not in favor of what they're doing, but you'd need to find an actual law they violated, or create a new law to prevent them from doing what they're doing.

It seems like a hard case to make for the plaintiffs. If I understand California law correctly, an employer can look up your social media history and use that to help decide if they will hire you or not. They can't ask for your username or passwords (obviously), but if you can figure out what social media accounts are theirs, you can deny them employment without telling them that you used their social media to inform the decision.

So how is it different if you have an algorithm do that work for you? If this is all publicly available information, whats the problem? I read the article and it didn't mention that a credit report was run by AI. So either the author left out important information, or these two are just shouting about nothing.

So just about every developed country (depending on who you ask).

Judging by your response and those that followed, critical thinking is in short supply. Being a small country makes it much easier to push initiatives.

"Norway's push for EVs involves aggressive incentives like tax exemptions (VAT, purchase tax), reduced fees (tolls, ferries, parking), and strong charging infrastructure, leading to nearly 96% EV market share for new cars in 2025".

There are reasons this doesn't work in larger populations. The most obvious is that supply would not cover the demand if the same percentage of people in the US tried to reach that same goal. What happens when the demand is high and there aren't enough EVs to cover said demand?

Norway also has a massive sovereign wealth fund that can be used to fund huge projects. Mix that with their small population and you end up with a very unique situation. So Norway is not a good example for other countries. It's a special case, and good for them.

You're one of those idiots that doesn't know the meaning of a word, even when used in context. For any other idiots out there, diversity does not specifically refer to race. A nice little hint was used in conjunction with diversity "diversity of morals".

Their population only being between 5 and 6 million people does make it a little less impressive. They're also 80-90% native Norwegians, so diversity of morals and perceptions isn't much of an issue there either.

I'm guessing they'll just have the humanoid/dexterous robots break into our houses to collect what little we have left.

It isn't the weight that counts, it's the reps. I salute you

Does walking to the fridge and car count as exercise?

Worse, we wedged an "AI assistant" into the silly thing as well.

The problem isn't with Windows. It's with macOS

All the other SLS tests have been great, so I doubt they'll have any issues. At least it isn't the Starliner capsule!