No one needs web apps, yet he sold us out with stupid new standards that increasingly take the power away from the visitor. Maybe he should add more scripting support into web 4.0 or whatever he wants to call it, that'll fix it.

Those expensive maintenance costs will occur maybe once during your 30 year mortgage. Once your mortgage is over you now own a great big asset where if you just rented all those years you would own nothing. Post mortgage that house will be much cheaper to live in than paying monthly rent - even if that's a push it will be an arguably better place to live.

An area of land can only support so many dwellings before adding more makes it a place no one wants to be, including current owners. At that point adding more housing to that area is counter productive, good urban planning doesn't allow an area to get to that point.

You can't just keep packing more people in, we aren't sardines. Yes there is plenty of land, so build out there and not where it's already too crowded.

- btw, I hate cities and really don't understand why anyone willingly lives in one.

AGAIN!

that's Ok though, you can now work 50, er no, 10, er wait -20 percent faster now!

that 'or local models' part should be in fine print it's so small you can't see it. Few people have the hardware capable of running the big models locally; and when they see the price to buy said hardware, for most - that ain't happening.

Must be an old car, my 6 year old Ford pins the current location within the app. Now if you had said bicycle I might have believed you.

Looks like it is yet another social platform that requires an account just to browse or see what is there; another walled garden built by another big data collection corporation.

Nike has a history of ignoring bad workplace conditions. If something new comes out that they are still in their old careless ways that could be a pretty bad hit.

I don't even know why as I was in middle school in the mid 80s and knew nothing about their issues but I told myself I would never buy Nike. Probably because a fellow classmate swore by them and I thought they were a clueless idiot.

I care about this game, it's fucking up the prices and availability of basic computer components and my electric bill.

Quite small... not really. $4,000 per person sounds nice, I wonder if the people actually saw any of it or if perhaps their property taxes were waved for that year. I am guessing no.

It seems they are mostly an automated company, or strive to be. How much of this is real world savings vs marketing trying to undercut competitors?

The human brain uses a fraction of the energy consumed by the current method of mimicking AI. How about we press these over-hyped companies to fix their horribly inefficient use of energy. They be restricted from expansion until they reduce energy waste by a magnitude of 10 for the same prompt, then get back to us.

You weren't laid off as much as the company you work for quietly went under and someone bought the scraps probably for the recognizable trademark name.

Where most developers inevitably fail is trying to please all users. All it ends up in is a bloated mess. It is very difficult to keep a project simple and only within your own vision for it. If you aren't in it for money don't worry about alienating users that your project was never intended to please.

That's back when the internet required skill to set up a connection. And putting something up wasn't immediately facing security break in attempts from around the world (port scans so maybe a bit), someone wasn't immediately copying the site to put up their own with advertisements, someone else wasn't suing you for thinking you infringed their idea, trolls weren't constantly trying to deface it (ok maybe they were), bots weren't posting crap to anyone with a forum or bug tracker, and AI wasn't slashdotting your site trying to leach your material. Did I miss anything?