sounds more like the usual consolidation of financial information into a spreadsheet for execs. This is not uncommon even in large enterprises and despite what the report/article seemed to imply, it was not the source of truth, it was the summary of the sources which were many other applications, still not great but not as bad as the headlines make it sound.

migrating away takes time, especially in large environments with a lot of regulatory oversight. none the less all the organisations I deal with ARE migrating, they have teams in place already building and validating environments. In the place I am currently working at the migration will take at least another 12-18 months though before production migration is complete.

yeah no. I work with quite a few customers that have adopted it. It is a licensing placeholder while they plan their migrations the fuck away

Australian and EURO, don't think NHTSA even test them as they are not sold in the US. ANCAP https://www.ancap.com.au/safet...
AURONCAP https://www.euroncap.com/en/ra...

Except BYD is NOT a state funded entity, it is a publicly listed company and operate at a profit. It helps that their cars are actually great quality and exceed the safety levels of most American made garbage.

yeah because no american product is made with any imported parts or components, moron.

Exact opposite experience, currently AMD user as Nvidia drivers funked me over so many times.

Lots of failures here from both Disney and the employee. For start what sort of moron uses a password manager for critical accounts.

OS/2 committed suicide with warp. I loved developing on it, but it was a bloated resource pig that made Windows look lean and fast and resulted in much higher costs to run it for the average user.

"vanilla-ization of music culture " pretty sure it aint AI that is guilty of that, it is purely self imposed, 99% of music nowadays just like movies is cut and paste from what has previously worked and they do it because surprise surprise that's what works for the general public.

They are just trying to keep the funding cycles going a bit longer with some pie in the sky predictions

What the fuck did my autocorrect do to that lol.

Google's moral and ethical compasses have always been very "flexible", it isnt exactly the first time they have updated Jussi on statements and pledges in favour of profit. I personally have no issue with them putting profit first, i do however take hustle with the bullshit statements that say they put anything else first.

The great harm argument can't include practices deemed illegal, it needs to be shown something in the remedy would be harming them. e.g. imagine google is the mafia paying bribes, the bribe receiver doesn't get to argue that it would do them great harm by not receiving the bribes anymore.

They didn't lie, they weren't however completely open with costs, just basically a statement on number of GPU hours for that specific model without revealing any other costs.