This is just another variation of BYOD. I don't know how many job functions soldiers carry out on their phones, but they are employed the entire time they are deployed so even if they are only using it for R&R they are still doing that under the auspices of breaks between job functions. As such they should be issued devices.
The chief economist at the Burning Glass Institute agrees, estimating that roughly 1% of professional jobs are now "AI jobs"
Man, fuck you and your crack pipe. My job doesn't become a janitorial job because I pick up a piece of trash and it doesn't become an AI job because some AI feature was snuck into some software I was using. This is why you can't trust economists' statistics. You can't have a hard science without meaningful data.
Did you have any trouble believing Cosby or Weinstein was guilty? Much more evidence has been presented against Trump, who we also conclusively know is a rapist, has bragged about peeping on minors, and also bragged about sexual assault on a hot mic. You're defending a known rapist. You're shit.
Japan has successfully achieved a trickle-down economy.
It would be even better if they tried to enforce peace
Why would that be better than increasing peace to begin with? Climate refugeeism is real.
Dude, the company you mentioned, produces Diesel emergency generators.
And not Sodium batteries.
Try googling "bluetti battery power station" dumbfuck
Having a message that resonates with the majority of people certainly helps.
Nobody has that, which is why so many potential voters stay home.
There are too many immigrants. Remove them and it will be good for jobs and the economy.
Yeah, stupid people really believe that, but I don't see them lining up to change jizz soaked sheets and pick vegetables.
There aren't enough men in the WNBA. It's OK to kill children up to the age of 5.
Rapeublicans believe it's OK to have a president who raped children as young as the age of 8.
Yes, it is always very much about control with our government, this is where you can legitimately bothsides because they are both authoritarian. That's why we're fucked, because it's how we came to this pass. It wasn't Republicans insisting that we be mass-surveilled and Democrats insisting that we not be, it was Rs saying let's do this and Ds saying well how much of this can we do and how should we do it? Womp fucking womp. Now the very idea that we should have privacy is equivalent in some "minds" with terr[or]ism. Orwell wept.
Agreed, but they would have to contract it out, there's no competence for that on the average staff. Logically this might be handled at the party level, especially in the case of Republicans, who have been very successful with unified messaging.
Well, if it happens, I hope they build more GAZ 66s.
Our drunken ancestors had little access to spirits until fairly recently and only a few people had figured out how to make beers over about 5% ABV so it really depends on what time period you're talking about. Americans drank about four times as much before prohibition as they do now, so there's that.
Young people are smoking weed or doing edibles because who wants to pay $10 for a beer or a $20 cocktail.
There is almost nowhere you can smoke cannabis publicly, so statistically no one is going out to smoke weed at an establishment. Therefore we can compare to drinking at home. I buy 12 packs of reasonably high test beer for around $20. Two of those is generally plenty. You can easily spend more than $4 a day on cannabis without even getting into the top shelf stuff. Hell, most smokers can do that even with $8 eighths.
Cannabis is taking over because it's less harmful in every way than alcohol.
The emergency is that they cannot produce enough fuel for the vehicles they have. The only non-drone vehicles they really need to produce more of are bombers, since Ukraine has blown up some of the few they have left, and they cannot really produce those either either. (They can make a few a year, maybe.) Without Ukraine, Russia's manufacturing capability was already limited. It was an important center for military vehicle production for the USSR.
No, it used Diesel (a type of gasoline).
You couldn't be more wrong overall if you used a LLM to generate your answer. Not only was it a sodium battery power station, but diesel is fuel oil, it's fundamentally different from gasoline, as in it's a different fraction of the crude.
They sell a lot more cars than you do so I'll file that appropriately.
The appeal to popularity is a logical fallacy. I stopped reading there, thanks.
"Here at the Phone Company, we serve all kinds of people; from Presidents and Kings to the scum of the earth ..."
