Comment Re:Figures (Score 1) 147
Longer: I don't know in detail what you got riled up about, because I didn't bother to read the messages you reacted to. I did read yours and found them informative, so thank you and have a nice day.
Longer: I don't know in detail what you got riled up about, because I didn't bother to read the messages you reacted to. I did read yours and found them informative, so thank you and have a nice day.
So for some tendonitis it's good to load properly, resting may not be beneficial.
Another thing, your story occurred after COVID vaccination, so it also occurred after COVID.
Even if the vaccine caused it, it doesn't mean that pushing the general population to get it was wrong, which is reflected in the fact that you can't sue the pharma company. Perhaps you can sue those who pushed out the recommendation? I think it's known and accepted that between 10 and 100 ppm of vaccinations cause severe adverse effects. You just happened to the on the receiving end of that decision...
An acquaintance, now around retiring age, got the obligatory polio vaccine as a child. His sister, 6 y.o., didn't react well, she was in a coma for 3 weeks before she died. 1970s, Netherlands.
The grandfather of a work colleague died of the COVID-19 vaccine. Turkey, 2021, obligatory vaccination. Muscle cramps and sweating for 3 days, then he died. 80+, not too fit but not bad for his age.
At some point there's no more good options, only bad ones.
The sad thing is, the world didn't learn much from COVID-19, the next time I'm afraid it won't go better.
I realise I'm not too early to this party but all things considered, my comment can hardly be considered late.
Nokia back in the day didn't make their own handset chips. Apple does, but they have no infrastructure, etcetera.
And Huawei came practically out of nowhere in 2012, so they have been very well funded by the Chinese government.
Shumer similarly gives an "oh god, it's getting so good so fast!" timeline that includes AI passing the bar. That 2023 story was debunked in 2024 and somehow this guy is unaware of that. Why in the world would someone so unable to identify reliable information be trusted on AI reliability?
Why do you assume he's unaware and not ignoring it because it's better for his finances? I do applaud your character, it takes a thief to catch a thief and you just clearly displayed that you assume the better. Thank you for giving some hope in this doom and gloom era.
But you put it right there: there's dishonesty due to interest of the specialists. In other words, those who push the term hallucination have something to sell. The public including reporters just follow.
This is Slashdot, light banter around technical stuff, we're not solving any problems here.
You apparently had serious cases in your mind, which is in your head. That doesn't mean I'm claiming you're imagining things, it just wasn't anything I wondered about when I wrote my comment. That's the hint of imagination, regarding what I wasn't talking about and what you turned into the subject.
Please read again what I commented on, you were commenting on something that I don't think I actually wrote. And then suspecting I'm mysantropic, etc etc
All warranty and guarantee clauses become null and void upon payment of invoice.