Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 453

They haven't nominated Hillary yet. Her coronation is next week

I didn't know that nominating the primary candidate with the most votes of any party in a democratic election was a "coronation". Did Kings also win the most votes? It's been a while since I read up on monarchies, guess I forgot that detail.

Comment Re:They should fix their user schema first (Score 1) 57

Change tracking / historical retention can be achieved in many ways. Depending on what you want to preserve and how you expect to need to recover it, you can simply backup the transaction logs, regularly backup the database itself, or create a history table for each table you need historical data on and create a trigger that copies affected rows, along with a timestamp column with a default of SYSDATETIME() or similar, on UPDATE or DELETE.

Or... instead of triggering a database wide update because a user changed their name.. just use a key like everybody else in every other database schema.

Comment Re:What a mess (Score 0, Troll) 453

The US has a choice between a politician so sleezy as to be a caricature of a cliche politician, and a narcicistic psychopath who would quite happily plunge the world into world war 3 if someone makes fun of the size of his hands.

I love how people assume Hillary is "a sleezy politician" based on the word of a "narcissistic psychopath and pathological liar who would plunge the world into world war 3."

Here's a wild idea. Maybe Hillary isn't a sleezy politician and the narcissistic pathological liar who would plunge the world into world war 3 is... *gasp* lying about her just like he lies about everything else.

The most dirt Trump seems to have on Hillary is:

1) She kept a private email server against institution best practices which ended up having 100 emails (out of hundreds of thousands) that had information the FBI considers top secret.
2) She kept a private email server against institution policy in which someone emailed her classified documents that were mis-labeled.
3) She passed NAFTA while first lady (which the CBO has concluded neither really hurt nor helped employment overall). (But Trump is totally fine with his VP who is a huge free trade advocate).
4) She voted for giving Bush the power to use military force against Sadaam. (But Trump is totally fine with his VP making the same choice.)
5) She won't say "Radical Islamic Terrorism" enough.

Even for a narcissistic pathological liar like Trump that's a pretty short list of attacks.

Comment Re:It is not unlimited. (Score 1) 409

It's not sleazy to end a sweetheart grandfathered deal that they only ever continued out of the "kindness of their hearts" for the customer's goodwill. If I move into an apartment for $1,000 a month and a year later when my lease is up my landlord allows me to stay at $1,000 a month even though the new rental rate is $2,000 they still can decide in 6 months if I'm throwing loud parties every month that they aren't going to keep me on my old less expensive lease. They can say "You know what, we're not interested in renewing your lease." or they can say "If you're going to be eliciting complaints regularly from your neighbors for noise you're going to have to pay the latest full monthly rate for a unit of your size which is $2,000.

"Maybe it's technically legal but it's still sleazy" applies as much or more in my opinion to being given an unlimited *phone* plan and then using it to substitute a fixed land-line internet plan at the latest network speeds even though you originally probably signed on for an unlimited 1mbps connection.

Another good metaphor would be you move into a pet-friendly apartment building. But you have a dog that endlessly barks. They can decide that while they are pet friendly *your* pet is not welcome and choose to not renew a lease. To be even more accurate it would be like moving into a pet friendly apartment, the apartment building being sold to a new owner and pets being banned, but anyone currently renting can keep a pet indefinitely. A year later your pet turns out to be a nuisance and you are evicted because your pet is loud.

Comment It is unlimited. (Score 2, Informative) 409

Their unlimited plan is unlimited. But if your unlimited usage is exceedingly high they can decide they don't want to sell you an unlimited plan anymore.

I know people who setup a wifi hotspot with their unlimited Verizon plan and then serve dozens of people on job sites for months on end uploading media and video. They're not normal users. I can understand why Verizon wouldn't want them anymore.

Similarly I use 10TB of backblaze for $50/year. I'm I imagine not-profitable. So I could understand if they told me that I have 2 months and then they don't want me as a customer anymore even though it's Unlimited. It's unlimited but not every unlimited customer is one they want. Maybe you go over one month and they allow you to spike for free. But I can see how a sustained money loser is not someone they are interested in keeping on. (Then again with backblaze I've converted numerous people to be customers and became a cloud storage customer at work so I imagine their generosity has paid off now.)

Comment Re:Yes but no. (Score 1) 302

They didn't drive. I posted an image of them very much parked on a sound stage with a fan and a green screen.

No film relies exclusively on CG except for animated films. Even the worst offenders of over-the-top CG according to you also have practical effects. I understand exactly what's being said and what it comes down to is "when I like the movie they used CG properly" "When I don't like the movie they used practical effects!" Because there is no objective distinction between the actual film-making approaches used between a regular cgi reliant blockbuster and what they did on Fury Road. Fury Road relied heavily on fans and greenscreens where the vehicles were effectively props. And there are plenty of big blockbusters where they have an on-set vehicle that's actually filmed.

So every film is guilty of what you accuse them of. You only though seem to apparently care when it fits your narrative.

Comment Re:Yes but no. (Score 1) 302

Please stop with this meme. When we talk about CGI we are talking about complete computer remakes of entire scenes for no reason, often even rendering the main cast themselves.

So they drove through a giant fire tornado?
There is a large formation of rocks with a giant waterfall spout built into it?
The main character's robotic arm was a real prosthetic?
The cars weren't composited in for safety?

Entire canyon environments weren't created in CG?
The wheels weren't entirely replaced and the entire ground moving under the vehicles wasn't added in post to make shots of parked vehicles look like they were driving fast?

It's not a meme that a substantial portion of Mad Max Fury Road was shot on greenscreen. As much as any other big blockbuster like The Avengers. The only difference is that many Mad Max Fury Road (which I loved) are in plain denial about the extent of the CG in the film. There is a reason it was nominated for VFX.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Never ascribe to malice that which is caused by greed and ignorance." -- Cal Keegan