Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Next step (Score 2) 21

Cameron John Wagenius pleaded guilty to hacking AT&T and Verizon and stealing a massive trove of phone records from the companies, ...

He'll be sending his resume to DOGE -- to help with all our SSA and IRS data (that they need, for some reason).

(And before anyone starts... Tens of millions of dead people aren’t getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claims)

Comment For now anyway ... (Score 4, Interesting) 58

From TFA:

Change likely prompted by CFPB lawsuit

While Chase didn't share what exactly prompted this decision, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) sued Early Warning Services (Zelle's operator) and three of its owner banks (Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo) in December for rushing the service into the market to compete with other payments platforms like Venmo and CashApp and failing to implement adequate consumer safeguards.

According to CFPB's lawsuit, this resulted in hundreds of thousands of Zelle and bank customers losing over $870 million since the payment service was launched.

The affected consumers were also denied assistance and told to contact the scammers to recover their money, while the banks failed to investigate their complaints and provide them with legally required reimbursement for errors and fraud.

The Trump Administration, via Elon Musk and DOGE, is trying to get rid of, or otherwise shutdown, the CFBP. Not sure why, (/s) but may be due to its probable regulation/oversight of X providing financial services/payments (via partnership wVISA). Hmm...

Elon Musk's DOGE takes aim at agency that had plans of regulating X
Vought orders CFPB to stop investigations and suspend new rules from taking effect

Comment Re:"Learn to code" (Score 2) 220

My question is how did they let these new hires through the interview process if they don't have the fundamentals of coding?

Your hiring process is broken. Stop hiring incompetent people or be prepared to spend your own time and money teaching them the skills they don't have.

I have an example of where I recommended something like that. I worked on a small development team at a large defense contractor and we were looking for a junior person. We interviewed several and I recommended a guy with less practical coding experience because he had a great attitude, acknowledged his shortcomings, demonstrated a strong willingness to learn and seemed to have the right personality/fit for our team. We hired him and I mentored him to bring up his coding skills. It worked out well.

Comment Re:One of the benefits of being a populist ... (Score 3, Insightful) 128

... is that your supporters are fucking morons. ...

I'm not going to argue against that, but would add that many people are either too busy or lazy to be properly informed and many of those, as well as others, wouldn't even try because the truth/facts would probably be contrary to what they want to hear. Others (may) know what's going on and are fine with it, possibly because they believe the bad stuff won't happen to them or only to other people they don't like -- ask the brown Trump supporters who are now getting deported how that's going... In any case, they believe the, mostly plainly obvious, lies and buy into the caustic us-vs-them rhetoric and that's on them.

Comment Re:This is not a new phenomenon (Score 1) 61

Cashier: That comes to $7.85
Me: OK, here's $8.10
Cashier (confused): But... why the extra $0.10?
People stopped doing mental arithmetic once calculators were everywhere.

Whenever I do something like this, I always size up the cashier and make a silent bet with myself as to what the result will be. Older people usually seem better than younger at grasping what's expected -- probably more/longer experience dealing with cash themselves. Using your example. I once got back $0.15 + my original dime from a youngster (*sigh*) -- instead of a quarter, for you youngsters reading this. :-)

Submission + - DOGE Approved to Transfer Labor Dept Data Using PuTTY (nbcnews.com)

fahrbot-bot writes: NBC is reporting that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency has received approval from the Labor Department to use software that could allow it to transfer vast amounts of data out of Labor’s systems, according to records seen by NBC News and interviews with two employees.

The approval for Musk’s team to use the remote-access and file-transfer software, known as PuTTY, has alarmed some of the Labor Department’s career employees. Musk, the head of DOGE, has dispatched subordinates throughout the government to radically overhaul or dismantle federal agencies with the backing of President Donald Trump.

Many of the details around DOGE’s actions have remained secret, though it has moved to gain access to large swaths of data held in the computer systems of individual agencies.

Concerns include the alleged use of artificial intelligence to analyze federal data and the alleged use of a computer server not familiar to government employees.

Transferring government data outside established protocols could have high stakes for anyone whose information is in those databases, because of the chance that more people would have access to their information than originally intended, increasing chances of a breach.

Two employees interviewed said that they considered the authorization to be a red flag because the DOGE members were new arrivals who, in their view, lacked sufficient vetting and experience for the access they were getting.

“We don’t know who they are, and we’re giving them free rein to extract whatever they want,” one employee said. “This is completely opposite of what we’d do to protect privacy.”

Comment Re:Inquiring minds want to know: (Score 2) 107

Sir, that is coming "in 6 months". Do not question Leon as he is never wrong.

Except, by his own admission in the Oval Office the other day, "Nobody's going to bat a thousand." My problem with Elon is that he's happy to apply Zuckerberg's saying, "Move fast and break things" to his mouth, w/o even bothering to check if what he's saying is even remotely true or accurate, especially when that check would be trivial in time and/or effort.

Comment Re:Inquiring minds want to know: (Score 2) 107

Yes and no. Apparently the State Dept. has decided to splurge $400 Million on "armored vehicles", i.e., the CyberThing made by Tesla with bullet proof windows. Gee, I wondered how that happened?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/0...

And he's continuing with adding financial services (w/VISA) to X, now that the CFPB has dropped their investigations and oversight -- (not sure why /s):

Elon Musk's DOGE takes aim at agency that had plans of regulating X

And, for some reason, he's now less concerned about investigations by the FAA into SpaceX, the NTSB/DOT into Tesla, the SEC/FDA into Neuralink ... (not sure why /s)

SEC 'reopens' probe into Neuralink
Musk's Neuralink brain implant company cited by FDA over animal lab issues
(Google the others ...)

Don't know what his actual motivations are for whatever he's doing with USAID, the Treasury, or DoEd, etc... but I'm pretty sure they're *not* altruistic.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -- Arthur C. Clarke

Working...