OK Harry R. Truman, you do you.

I didnâ(TM)t catch that in TFS. I just clicked thre TFA then the Apple source post. Why the fuck did they break it up like that?! Almost feels intentional.

Again this is ALREADY A RESTRICTED PERMISSION AND HAS BEEN FOR QUITE A WHILE. They are just changing the flow for enabling it. You can still enable it.

How do you figure that? From the Apple post: "Going forward, we will introduce additional controls to ensure that users who genuinely wish to grant an app this extraordinary level of access can only do so with very explicit user action. "

It's already a OS controlled permission today. You will still be able to enable it for an app if you really want, they just want to make tighten the gate up to make sure you really want to and don't blind-click though. Seems like a reasonable compromise to me.

I was looking at why one of the RSS feeds on my homepage (yes, I still use one, shut up, I'm old) and when I loaded the feed URL in my browser it was being fronted by a cloudflare bot check.

In the short term. Right now the bad guys (well, non-state bad guys) don't have access to frontier models with the cyber security nanny mode disabled. However open source models are getting better every day and most don't have those guardrails, and even if they do it's not impossible to remove them when you have access to the weights. So yea, short term it's going to be an issue.

Long term, however, once this initial tsunami is worked through then hopefully more of these types of bugs will be found before new code ships, making it harder to find critical vulnerabilities in the wild.

Could be why he wants to rename it: https://techcrunch.com/2026/09...

Yea if you ever hear a F-16 pilot talk about landing with anything serious wrong with the aircraft, they usually mention booking it the hell away from the jet as soon as they can get out because of that hydrazine risk if a fire starts.

F-16's have a tank of hydrazine on board. It's used to power the emergency power unit which can provide backup electrical and hydraulic power. Whenever there is an incident with one they treat it as a hazmat situation just to be safe.

Or you could replace the camera sensor with something to feed the phone images by faking the sensor data. But again, you are at that well funded government level again.

Keeping prices the same IS the price war. All of those plans run way below what the equivalent API costs would be, and it's not getting any cheaper to run the models on the back end.

You do you. For myself, after getting a chemo port implanted on my 49th birthday following having a large tumor and half my colon removed I decided sometime escaping through alcohol was no longer worth it. Maybe too late to decide that but I'd rather give it up that take any more chances. So far I somehow still make it through the day.

IDScan is the company that appears to be the source of the leak

Nah, it will be GameStop

I hear they are popular with some OnlyFans creators. They should check there for some reviews.