Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not selling them Quantum-Juju-stuff... (Score 1) 47

... sounds like doing them a favor. You could just as well put homeopathic medicine on the embargo list, having similar practical consequences.

Right. It seems to me that the PRC's technological dominance would lie not in big-ticket high technology but in those little IC-enabled devices, including the so-called Internet of Things. I'd be more afraid of what would happen if the PRC did start mass manufacturing backdoored "smart" bulbs, plugs, sensors, etc. Imagine some unglamorous hack that would trigger a blackout not in some high security military facility but in a few high-volume meat processing plants. Bye bye Big Mac.

Comment The threat is the thing (Score 1) 45

The RIAA wants the status quo, and is comprised of lawyers who can't wrap their minds around the implications of tech. But you can't ban an AI tool like this, and the code is in the wild. Now they will have to play wack a mole on tunes in court with created works. But AI is not too much different than an artist, the other thing is how are you going to prove that the AI made it?

The RIAA doesn't need to sue every single alleged violator. They just have to make one or two successful prosecutions/persecutions, and then spam the others with "offers" to settle for a small "fee" or face the legal consequences of the supposed violation.

Comment Re:Always with the politics (Score 1) 161

Yes - vegans are killers, they deprive life from it's life just like us corpse eaters. They have just made a personal decision that plant's are not eligible for their list of things to keep alive. Not worthy, so killing and eating is perfectly okay.

It's possible to be a vegan without killing anything. Just eat the fruit but remember to spit or poop out the seeds. Eating a whole lettuce probably should be considered plant murder, as one would be eating the whole plant. Which makes me wonder, why object to the eating of animal corpses? It's not as if they're still alive.

Comment Re:The USA is a wealthy nation? That's news to me (Score 1) 155

This is because poverty is an artifact of the natural tendency to form dominance hierarchies at all, NOT an artifact of any particular group who happens to be high up on that hierarchy.

Dominance hierarchies cannot explain while the poor in the US and other first world countries are better off than the poor and even the middle-class in third world countries.

Comment Re:Apple canâ(TM)t win (Score 1) 67

When apple find out the chipset they use is crap they write code into OS X that mitigates it as best they can and avoid the expensive returns. It doesn't always work, but when it does it lets apple use cheap parts and yet the end user gets a better experience. This is easily confused for quality hardware until you check the parts list and realise it's all relatively low quality.

Don't confuse "off-the-bleeding-edge" with "low quality".

That seems to be my impression when scanning reviews. Apple hardware are rarely the fastest. As an indirect proof of this, Apple appears to be the only major, still existing personal computer manufacturer to have changed CPU architectures, at least thrice in the past two decades in an attempt to again achieve parity with the high-end Windows fpPCs offered by other manufacturers.

Comment Re:Apple canâ(TM)t win (Score 1) 67

More affordable? Please. They pocket the difference when cutting BoM.

Not an Apple user, fan or hater. I'd always assumed that the reason iDevices were expensive was because they were made of the best components/materials. Is this no longer the case? My last hands-on experience with an Apple product was with a 10-year old pre-iMac that left a very bad impression on me at the time, mainly because it was dog-slow when compared to the "modern" Windows PCs. Now, when I look back at it, I'm pretty amazed that a user-facing computer could actually run that long and still be functional.

Comment Re:CowboyNeal option (Score 1) 89

I don't think your observation would apply to a Big Data company such as Meta. It's not as if they're involved in the production of something essential like food or medicine, or even something less essential but useful in the real world, like BEVs or rocket ships (for delivering satellites not billionaire space tourists). Whatever they do, they're bound to be wasting their resources on something. So it's either this tech, which might at least prove useful (medical imaging or engineering previz), or another social media sharing app.

Comment Re:If you can't tell the difference does it matter (Score 1) 75

When I think about words like "understand", I just realized I can't really explain what I mean when I say I understand something. The closest I can define the concept would involve producing some output, so that others may check if I really understood what they've written/said. So to prove that I understand you, I've written this post. Now if a program can produce a sentence similar to this, won't that qualify as understanding already? Or maybe I've misunderstood you.

Slashdot Top Deals

The trouble with money is it costs too much!

Working...