That is just uninformed nonsense.

If you include leaving out important context, choosing inferior solutions, violating KISS and some other things, none of the models will make it to 60%.

Financial engineers are not engineers. Proper engineers understand redundancy and risk management. These clowns only understand greed.

Is the training data open? No? Not an open model then.

AMD is active in the ARM space and has been for quite some time. Just not for the end-user market at this time.

What an insightless statement. You missed everything that is the problem here and instead went for making this out to be "anti tech". Are you mentally challenged?

While true in this case, that is just a matter of bad procedures and bad training.

Obviously. The "prove me wrong approach" is a classical inversion: Make an insane claim you have no valid evidence for. Then require others to prove you wrong. A typical approach uses by those with weak minds but string opinions. The only real way to deal with these people is to stop talking to them as they will just waste your time.

Tell us you are an idiot without telling us you are an idiot.

Incidentally, if you really want to find out whether some aliases belong to one person, time clustering analysis is a good way as is analyzing the factual mistakes present in their posting. Of course, you are very likely not smart enough to do the first and the second requires you to understand actual facts, not the hallucinations morons like you mistake for facts. Oh, an you need to be actually willing to find something out and not just have your misconceptions confirmed. You probably do not even understand how that process works.

Some people have no place in civilized society. Yes, making a profit is fine. But it has to be reasonable, and customers have to still get a good price. Clearly, greed has overtaken major parts of US society. See also, for example, medical prices.

Nope. Only in your disconnected hallucinations. But obviously a habitual liar like you would try this approach.

Nope. Not at this time. But as usual, you just lie more when confronted with facts.

Reliable undo is not something LLMs can do, as they can basically do nothing reliably. Any reliability, undo capability, safety about sending all your info somewhere, etc. needs to come from other protection layers.

I think actually, yes. But let somebody else do the stupid thing to themselves. I expect this will hasten the end of the hype significantly.

Please stuff your lies by misdirection up your behind.