Amazon Is Permanently Closing Eight Cashierless Stores (cnn.com) 148
Amazon is permanently closing eight of its 29 Amazon Go convenience stores that offer customers the ability to shop without any kind of checkout process. From a report: Amazon debuted the Go store in Seattle in 2016. It hailed the stores as the future of shopping, especially for convenience stores in busy downtowns of major cities. At one point Amazon expected there to be hundreds if not thousands of the stores nationwide, according to published reports that were never confirmed by the company. But they never lived up to those expectations.
[T]he closings, first reported by Geekwire, are another sign of cost-cutting efforts at the online shopping giant. [...] The stores being closed include two in downturn Seattle that had already been shut on a temporary basis, leaving five in the city. In addition it is closing two in New York City and four in San Francisco. The six closings of stores still operating are due to take place April 1. In addition to the 21 Amazon Go stores that will remain, there are two locations in New York that the brand shares with Starbucks.
[T]he closings, first reported by Geekwire, are another sign of cost-cutting efforts at the online shopping giant. [...] The stores being closed include two in downturn Seattle that had already been shut on a temporary basis, leaving five in the city. In addition it is closing two in New York City and four in San Francisco. The six closings of stores still operating are due to take place April 1. In addition to the 21 Amazon Go stores that will remain, there are two locations in New York that the brand shares with Starbucks.
All those non-cashiers, now out of work (Score:4, Funny)
How will they survive.
has anyone tried one? (Score:5, Interesting)
I, for one, don't see the appeal.
But then I prefer to pay cash, avoid loyalty programs, and not be tracked even at a regular grocery store.
these amazon stores seem like a tracking bonanza.
Re:has anyone tried one? (Score:5, Informative)
I have, and it was actually wonderful. It's enormously easier to just walk in, grab what you want, and walk out, without having to be gated by a checkout system whether it's manned or unmanned. I imagine they're banking on the idea that it's psychologically easier to just walk in for a single item and not feel like you have to make the trip "worth it". It was also a much better organized store than any in the area, which I presume is basically required for the tracking to work. This results in a complete lack of lines. Also, during the earlier days of the pandemic when people didn't know much about how it spread, I appreciated that I literally never had to touch anything other than the food I was literally buying: no doors, no credit card reader, nothing. The only sort of gating is that upon entering you kind of have to hover your palm above the device (there's an alternate mode where you use a credit card).
The only downside is that it is smaller than my regular traditional grocery stores, and while it makes up for that somewhat by better organization and presumably better logistics that let it restock just in time so it doesn't need huge amounts of spare space, it's just still not got the same selection. So my pattern became little shopping trips there, big (or very specific) shopping trips at the larger stores.
I can't stress enough how much easier it is to just walk in, grab something, and walk out, without having to handle anything. You can still see and cross-check the bill on your Amazon account. I double-checked more carefully than I do when a human is scanning things, but it was always right.
It's unfortunately been closed for over a year now.
Yes, you will be tracked in the same sense as you're tracked if you buy stuff at Amazon, who knows your address already. And I don't relate at all to wanting to use cash, that's a hassle. I appreciate the privacy difference, but I don't really care if a bank can tell that I buy groceries at an address close to my house. I'm not trying to diminish your concerns, but I think you're well outside the norm.
Re: (Score:3)
I double-checked more carefully than I do when a human is scanning things, but it was always right.
This to me is the interesting question of just not how accurate it was but if it was also easy to trick, I wonder what the shrink was in this store versus a normal store, if it's at least equal I could see the appeal, maybe they'll license the tech to other retailers instead. If they have the stats to back it up might be worth, or the development is just too expensive for the concept. Appreciate the informative post.
Also curious, did they sell produce and if so how? All pre-packaged?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Correlation causation, is there a report to back up that reason and that goes to my other point, are the shrink levels more/less/equal to a traditional store model and which cities are we talking about?
Re: has anyone tried one? (Score:2)
If you're not already aware of this, that's pretty much willful ignorance at this point.
Re: (Score:2)
So, no evidence that Amazon closed these stores due to crime? If there is I can look at it and jusge for myself but insulting me kinda makes me doubt any assertions made
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
None of those are the Amazon stores?
Re: (Score:2)
The notion that big cities all have lots of crime is also mistake
Re: (Score:2)
thx for sharing your experience. I get the convenience factor, as yeah, lines suck.
some q's:
1. I guess there is some kind of initial setup/registration required. What is that process like? You mention that you just need to hover your palm over a device, so I guess you previously gave them some kind of palm print?
2. Does the store offer fresh produce? I mainly buy fresh fruits and vegetables, which are often sold by weight, and one can usually pick through them to (hopefully) find the good ripe items
Re: (Score:3)
I have, and it was actually wonderful. It's enormously easier to just walk in, grab what you want, and walk out, without having to be gated by a checkout system whether it's manned or unmanned...
As we continue to watch automation remove the lower rungs from the Ladder of Success, creating the socialist programs to sustain the unemployable at ever-increasing numbers, tell me...is a 300% increase in price in stores like that still going to be "wonderful" for you and everyone else paying the ultimate price for that convenience?
Manned vs. unmanned, depends on whether you enjoy paying a lot more in taxes or not.
Re: (Score:2)
Who said we have to give into socialism? Every time jobs went away, more jobs were created in other spots.There is no such thing as "unemployable". Just people who are indigent, indolent, and lazy.
No, there's just mainly ignorant people like you who assume the revolutions of yesteryear are anything like what is coming. The previous answer when your buggy-whip job was made obsolete, was to go get an education. The insane cost of the questionable-value Indoctrination System that replaced higher education in America is but one new problem with that solution, and the fact that new automated solutions coming online aren't just making humans unemployed. They're making them unemployable.
As for socialism, that isn't going to happen. Heroes like Ted Cruz will make sure that the US doesn't assign another debt limit and even if it might hurt the credit record, it isn't going to happen. Social Security and Medicare are boondoggles already and having those gotten rid is only a matter of time.
Oh, championing t
Re: (Score:2)
So why won't other shops organise themselves better?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Cost. Retail stores have low profits. They increase profits through volume of sales and by cutting costs. Cutting costs means low paid workers, possibly the owner is actually doing much of the work or doubles as a manager. Bigger box stores can do better (ie, Walmart, Target, etc) because the scale makes some things easier. That said, I've seen few stores that are badly organized unless it's a very tiny shop, not a franchise, and they're trying to make use of all available space to avoid renting a larg
Re: (Score:2)
So why won't other shops organise themselves better?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Ohh... this is an easy one. (I own a retail business)
The more time people spend going up and down aisles looking at things... the more they buy.
You may be like me - go in, get what you were after, buy it, leave... but most people are susceptible to impulse buying: something catches their attention as they are wandering around, and they buy it. Many people don't even have specific items in mind when they go shopping -they are just looking for something to buy.
Re: (Score:2)
You're mixing a lot of factors in an unreasonable way, none of which actually have to do with the trade-offs involved. "Paying cash" and keeping cash in one's pocket are not significant complications. Paying with credit does not save one from having to track a budget. Being watched by cameras does not reduce the time it takes to get to and from the store, yet that time is what motivates buying in a weekly trip rather than daily trips.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It hailed the stores as the future of shopping, especially for convenience stores in busy downtowns of major cities.
And once again, a company with incompetent management gets bitten in the ass by their refusal to acknowledge reality.
Hey, guess where there is *A LOT* of crime. In the downtown area of major cities. Guess who loves the idea of a store with no employees. Criminals? What? I am SHOCKED!
They will never admit it, but I guarantee that these stores are being closed because they have a huge amount of theft.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How do you steal when they just charge your account for whatever you took?
You can't get in without a pre-authorized payment method on file. Good luck disputing the charge when they have you on camera checking in, taking the item off the shelf, and leaving. If you force your way in, security has you trapped and can easily deal with you -plus it is all on camera, so easy case for the DA if you get violent.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wondered how this would work when they announced the idea.
Security experts (as well as random internet personalities) tried to screw with the system and see if they could make it fuck up... it worked amazingly well. There are A LOT of cameras. Many angles on every item on every shelf in every aisle... their system has been close to foolproof.
There are articles about it, from the technical perspective of the implementation team, and from the perspective of various people trying to fool it . Google for t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not saying anything is impossible.
I am saying that people have tried to find ways to make it screw up -and none have publicly reported success.
I did read about some issues in the early closed tests, but nothing once they opened to the public. This could be because Amazon kept it quiet, or because the successful thieves didn't want to announce what they had found. Or maybe... the system works.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an Amazon store. What are the odds that they're under $1k? Also, if he pops out and punches the security guy in the face, that's now assault, and it doesn't matter if they were or weren't shoplifting, they're now going to be under arrest.
Especially, if is as common, the security guard is actually an "off duty" police officer. They retain law enforcement rights at all times. Oops, you just punched a police officer, that's a felony, not to mention an ass kicking.
Plus, if you want to get tricky about
Re: (Score:2)
Edit: Forgot one as well. The RFID cards might be in a shielded wallet. But everything in the store has to be RFID if you're not going through a checkout process. So how do they identify the customer?
The obvious one? That criminals have been busted over multiple times? Cell phone. If you don't have a valid cellphone on you that is detected when you enter, or however else they're detecting that you are you in order to bill you, you're not a valid customer and they can keep a closer eye on you. Includ
Re: (Score:2)
You apparently are unfamiliar with the legal process in places like SF. No one is getting arrested for shop lifting. No one is going to pop out and try to stop a shop lifter. What for?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Given this is America, why did nobody simply shoot him ?
Re: (Score:2)
This is a prime example of why places hire off duty police officers to act as security. Assaulting an officer is a serious crime -if you survive.
Re: (Score:2)
Oddly, all their locations are in the urban cores of liberal coastal cities.
These areas have higher levels of petty crime and more hostility to labor-saving innovation.
They should have more varied test sites if they really want an objective test of the concept.
Re: (Score:2)
uh, it's amazon.
Just review the books and videos they censored/removed the past 5 years or so and their bias becomes self-evident.
(I'm not sure a list exists (probably does), I've just personally witnessed them removing content because they didn't agree with it, as per their own statements)
Re: (Score:2)
uh, it's amazon.
Or, you know, that's where the people live.
Re: (Score:2)
all the people live in urban cores of liberal coastal cities?
it makes perfect sense then.
Re: (Score:2)
There is an Amazon Fresh across the street from my workplace. A bunch of my coworkers (mostly the 20-something crowd) go there often. I went once, for novelty's sake, and decided I'd rather walk or drive somewhere that wasn't festooned with cameras, even if it takes an extra 5 or 10 minutes if travel each way.
Re: (Score:2)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/w... [wikimedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
But then I prefer to pay cash, avoid loyalty programs, and not be tracked even at a regular grocery store.
So, how is the witness protection program these days? (I kid)
I've saved significant amounts of money using cash back and loyalty programs. In fact, Target's 5% off everything is nearly like not having to pay sales tax (and before someone says "Target is overpriced", the discount stacks with competitor price matching).
Bragging that you overpay for everything really isn't the flex you might imagine it to be, but then again, this is Slashdot not Slickdeals.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow...where do you live where sales tax is only 5%?
Honest question.
Re: (Score:2)
I, for one, don't see the appeal.
Well have you tried one?
I stopped by a few years back in Seattle. It's very cool, you just go through, pick up whatever you want, and go on your way. No fumbling with a hand scanner, waiting in line for a cashier, or waiting in line for a self-checkout kiosk before taking longer than a cashier would to scan everything.
It is a bit creepy but they're not really getting any more information than they would from online shopping.
Re: (Score:2)
no, I haven't tried one, that's why I asked if others had, to share their experiences. as you did, thank-you.
You say you went once, so I have to think there was some kind of one-time setup/registration involved as well, yes?
Re: has anyone tried one? (Score:2)
You put a bank card in the Amazon app and scan a QR code on the way in. That's all it takes.
Re: (Score:2)
But then I prefer to pay cash
I have had the same 20EUR banknote in my wallet (and the only note in my wallet) for over a year now. I honestly can't remember the last time I handled cash locally and the only reason I handled cash when abroad was to get money out of the machine to try and get it changed into one of every denomination for the wife's world currency collection.
I have much bigger things to worry about than the supermarket knowing that I like Jack's Smokey BBQ Sauce.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't had cash in my wallet for over a year and it took 2 years to spend out the $300 I pulled the last time I went to an ATM. Cash is inconvenient as well as filthy as fuck and disgusting to touch if you think about where it's been and how many others have done god knows what with it.
Re: (Score:2)
I will be HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY to take all that nasty, filthy cash off your hands my friend.
Of course I do use CC's for online purchases, no way to get. around that, but I really do like using cash, particularly for buying
Re: (Score:2)
I get why you don't want your vices in a database but seriously, cash is really ick.
Poor girl at the pharmacy last week was handed a pile of coins by the woman in front of me. She was clearly grossed out and immediately scrubbed her hands thoroughly with the nearby sanitizer. With good reason for both.
I put my credit card in the reader, took the bag she placed on the counter, no one touched, everything was clean and we were both happy.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, that is indeed very interesting.
If I might, may I ask in what part of the country you live?
I've never seen a reaction to that before for handling cash...I see people using cash all the time in stores around here and I never have seen even the slightest of negative responses to handlin
Re: (Score:2)
I'm in Florida but when I was in California for years everyone paid with cc whenever possible, too. Don't generally see tips or cash on tables, etc.
In this case the most likely reason for her buying her meds in change was she's a drug addict and doesn't have any cash. That was spare change she got together for her pharmacy trip.
In that case, doubly so on the yuck because the poor girl now has to deal with coins that have been in even more horrible places than usual.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the info.
Interesting one here...even when I pay for meals out with a CC, I always try to leave the tip in cash....to help the server not have to declare everything.
I remember my days as a server and bartender and cash tips were always what I wanted.
I forget how much you "had" to declare....something like 10% of your total sales at the end of the night.
If it is documented on a CC....no getting around that, but cash...well, if you were were makin
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a good tipper but it's all cc. I simply don't have any cash.
Maybe once a year or so I hit the ATM and it lasts another year or so.
With cash tips were you concerned about anyone (other workers or customers) swiping the tip before you could get to the table?
Re: (Score:2)
Don't have any, don't carry any, none in my wallet. Why do you have 31k inflating away in your basement?
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, I get it. I've got some cash in bank doing nothing, too, but I did move a lot of it to a money market account so I'm not matching inflation but getting 4-5% back while I figure out what to do with it is better than nothing.
Or if you know you don't need it for a while, stick it in a CD if you can find a decent rate.
It pains me to hear it's sitting in your basement.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not so much the BBQ sauce (although it might be if it has a lot of sugar in it)....But the whole picture that the store gets of your consumption.
Let's say they build a profile on your less than healthy purchases....you regularly buy a lot of hard liquor and beer at the grocery store? You tend to buy a lot of salty, sugary high calorie foods? Lots of sodas?
All that unhealthy food regularly bought
Re: (Score:2)
It's clearly intended for Amazon fans Mark up the price, then remove the mark-up if you're a Prime member. All groceries with a 10 day return policy, just ship the milk back in the supplied envelope. Guaranteed you never have to talk to a cashier who looks poor.
And the news of these stores closing just confirms that Amazon is not just putting competing stores out of business but is willing to destroy its own stores in its war against retail.
Re: has anyone tried one? (Score:2)
No checkouts. No queues. You just pick up what you want and walk out. How can you not see the attraction in that?
Re: (Score:2)
I can understand it might appeal to others. That's why I asked if anyone had tried one, to share their experiences with us.
Have you tried one of these amazon stores yourself? Seems like it would be wonderful for you...
Re: (Score:3)
Omg, get over it. No one posted anything about how they should close the stores to make the mentally ill and emotionally unstable people suffer. The virtue signaling look-at-me-I'm-special-and-you're-bad thing is so boring. I'm sure he's really sowwee for not thinking of the 0.00001% of people when he posted.
Re: (Score:2)
Lol, learn to read. I'm not crying about anything. I was mocking you. And I never lied once. You are an illiterate and that is not my fault. Public school, I assume?
We're done here, you're an idiot and a cry baby and AC and a waste of my time if you can't even understand 8th grade English.
Go say whatever last thing you like, I assume you'll say I'm a liar again and a bad person and blah blah blah. I won't be back to read it. You're too boring and predictable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: has anyone tried one? (Score:2)
Self-checkouts are frustrating. They freak out and call staff if you do anything non-robotic. You have to scan things yourself. You often have to queue for them anyway. They don't really save time. They certainly don't reduce annoyance.
Amazon's setup was actual convenience, not a cynical attempt to save money on cashiers. You literally pick what you want and walk out. Simple as that.
Damn. (Score:2)
Since Covid killed the 24-hour grocery store, I was really hoping this concept would've take off. Yeah, I know not being able to grocery shop in the middle of the night is the epitome of first world problems.
Re: (Score:3)
It isn't so much Covid that killed it, it's the decline of societal civility. These stores were seeing so many crime problems at night with shitheads, they were just looking for an excuse to trim their hours. Covid gave them that excuse.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm probably alone on this, but I'd actually subscribe to Walmart's paid membership if it granted after-hours access to the stores. Solves the scumbag problem and they get some profit out of the deal to boot.
Re: (Score:3)
If WM offered 24/7 access for a paid membership, I'd definitely see about that. Bonus points if they have some type of eatery of coffee shop going there, because where I live, even the old tried and true Denney's and IHOPs are not 24 hours anymore. I don't really blame COVID for that, but the rent hikes which make it impossible to afford to work at a restaurant in any sizable city.
Re: (Score:2)
My local Winco is still open 24/7.
Re: Damn. (Score:2)
What's not being said? (Score:3)
Maybe they are closing for the same reason Walmart is pulling the last of its stores from Portland. Theft.
Re:What's not being said? (Score:5, Interesting)
Maybe they are closing for the same reason Walmart is pulling the last of its stores from Portland. Theft.
No, it's just that these stores are extremely expensive to operate. All the cameras, GPUs, power, network, etc... the economics just don't work. And on top of that, in order to make the customer believe they never fail, they do have manual checks (which is why sometimes you get the receipt immediately and some times it takes 15 minutes).
Also, they (same with competitors BTW) never got them to work at scale, and I by scale I mean number of people that can be at the store at the same time, square meters or even number of SKUs.
I worked at one of their competitors for a while, BTW, so I saw some of the problems first hand.
Re: (Score:2)
competitors... others are doing this no checkout thing?
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's just that these stores are extremely expensive to operate. All the cameras, GPUs, power, network, etc... the economics just don't work.
Cameras, GPU power and networks are all far cheaper than paying even a single minimum wage employee, even in places like Europe where power is expensive. Equipment is a sunk cost for infrastructure. They are expensive stores to build, but not operate. In fact being cheap to operate is one of their primary drivers. You run a skeleton crew and only employ people to restock shelves at the end of a shift.
I worked at one of their competitors for a while, BTW, so I saw some of the problems first hand.
Problems exist for every new development, none of them are insurmountable. Nothing works at scale, until it
Re: (Score:2)
No! I simply don't believe that [youtube.com] would ever happen.
Re: (Score:3)
No! I simply don't believe that [youtube.com] would ever happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Probably, also cashless stores don't make too much sense when local cities are creating laws to force them to accept cash.
https://abc7news.com/consumer-... [abc7news.com]
https://www.geekwire.com/2019/... [geekwire.com]
Don't get me wrong, this was just before the pandemic. During the pandemic, many stores and restaurants were allowed to go cashless even in those cities.
Re: What's not being said? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You missed a word. "They're not profitable enough". Very few large businesses continue to operate based purely on whether they are black on the balance sheet. There's usually a minimum criteria for profitability applied.
That said in some cases there's strategic reasons to keep a profit losing business, such as to prevent a competitor from moving into an area.
Re: (Score:2)
"Theft would be obvious answer."
Why is theft the obvious answer in a store whose unique feature is tracking everything that everyone inside touches?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, in San Francisco anyway, the more dipshitted in the city government managed to push through a city ban on cashless payments. The ban has barely been enforced thus far... particularly during COVID. But if they were going to drop the ban hammer on anyone first, it's hardly surprising that it was Amazon first. So, in SF anyway, it was pretty much inevitable that Go would be going away.
I don't know when they plan to start cracking down more broadly. But in my neighborhood it's often more convenient to
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I guess all those daily videos being published on the news or YouTube are just AI Deepfakes being constructed to push a narrative.
D'oh....how did I not see through this immediately?
Thank you for bringing this to
Apparently they're contracting AND expanding (Score:2)
They seem to be repositioning. Puyallup, Washington - which is surprising to me, because Puyallup is a small-ish town smack dab in the middle of Boeing-driven suburban sprawl. Not a lot of density, in other words.
Doubly-weird (to me, anyway) is that they're advertising stuff like made-to-order breakfast...
Re: (Score:2)
s/Puyallup/I've been seeing a lot of ads for a new store opening in Puyallup/ .
Re: (Score:2)
"Not a lot of density"
Maybe low "people per square mile density", but high "households with an Amazon account per competitor store" density.
San Francisco stores were not cashierless (Score:5, Informative)
These were less stores (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
*eye roll*
The cost of healthcare was the entire reason for Obamacare.
The cost of education is why the Feds took over the student loan programs decades ago.
True, no one cares about your rent. Rent control is a dismal failure and what else can the government do about private rental housing agreements? I'm sure there is some class warfare+socialist answer you have in mind. Move to a cheaper place or get a better job.
What caused the Federal Reserve to start raising rates is a few things:
1) rates were ridicul
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot to add what may be the primary driver of inflation at the moment:
4) The US government dumped vast amounts of money into the economy to make sure it didn't completely collapse during the pandemic. There was every expectation that the eventual outcome would be inflation.
And then the two contributing factors made things worse:
5) The global supply chain failure.
6) The Ever Given crash.
Re: (Score:2)
I did strongly imply (4) when I talked about printing cash but yes I didn't mention (5) but that's entirely because of the global response to Covid which is a whole other story.
I'm not sure what you mean by (6)?
Re: (Score:2)
The Ever Given accident put a serious monkey-wrench into the global supply chain over and above the COVID-related issues. If it alone didn't sow the seeds for inflation, it added plenty of nice, rich fertilizer. We saw an immediate rise in prices related to the incident, but the knock-on effects reverberated for many months.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
I would speculate that overall the costs of shipping have risen since the incident as the insurance companies need to recoup their losses, and the ship
Re: (Score:2)
>What is socialism's answer to high inflation?
Perfect Socialism has 0% inflation. Inflation is the rate you are paying investors for their investment: inflation is just the way we measure the interest you make on the investment. Perfect socialism would have no investors (no one who expect a return beyond 1:1), thus no inflation.
Concentration of wealth in investor's hands is one problem, and the *growth* of that horde of wealth is another: inflation. Even if most of that money were to make it's way back i
Re: (Score:2)
Why would socialism have zero inflation? Because you wouldn't have a functioning economy because humans don't act like that. Humans are greedy and selfish and want more. We are born that way. Babies don't give their candy to other babies. In a society where everyone shares the results of labor equally there will always be those who produce more than they get and will be pissed off at the people who don't produce as much (because they're lazy, not disabled and helpless) and the things quickly grind do
Re: (Score:3)
Why does requiring the store to accept cash payments require additional cashiers? Why couldn't they have a machine accept the occasional cash payment?
While the bill collectors on many snack vending machines are notoriously slow and unreliable, the ATMs at my primary credit union have been able to quickly accept and process stacks of bills (and paper checks) for well over a decade (without requiring envelopes or deposit slips). Obviously, there is a cost to purchasing and maintaining these machines, but I
Re: (Score:2)
Why does requiring the store to accept cash payments require additional cashiers? Why couldn't they have a machine accept the occasional cash payment?
Theft. The whole problem with this is not the method of payment but keeping people honest by ensuring they can be billed in a CNP transaction to their credit card.
In the Netherlands this is a problem for these stores. They *require* people have credit cards, ... in a country where less than 20% of the population does. Debit cards or other forms of cashless transactions are not accepted since the system depends on the ability for the vendor to unilaterally bill you a specific amount which can't be done easil
Re: (Score:3)
I imagine you've hit the nail on the head. The problem is that they basically exclude a massive potential customer base - those who don't have/want to use an Amazon account. It does sound like a neat system, but I don't find normal convenience stores that difficult to use. I don't have an Amazon account, and I wouldn't sign up for one just to get access to these stores. So they're trying to operate a much more capital intensive operation that appeals to less customers.
Maybe in another decade when the tech
Re: (Score:2)
And Costco excludes the potential customer base of anyone who doesn't care to pay $50 or whatever per year and carry around the membership card. BFD. Not every store is targeted at every single person in the world. And that is OKAY!
I thought Amazon Go was a neat idea from the outset. And when they opened a location between my old office and MUNI station, I was sold. It was a super convenient way to pop in and grab a quick drink or sandwich... the latter were of significantly higher quality than at mos
Shocker (Score:3, Insightful)
that's fine (Score:2)
They tried to replace bodegas, but what we really needed was better vending machines.
Downturn Seattle (Score:2)
Your Freudian slip is showing.
Re: (Score:2)
Forced Technology (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's because they used to be smart and just haven't relaized they're now in their senile stage. Ie, the Macs were good computers. Overpriced, but very good compared to the wacky ad-hoc design of PCs. But lately they're just relying too much on micro monetization from app and music stores and lost the "tech".