Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Google already does this (Score 1) 149

Google owns Waze, which does these sponsored pop-up ads. I tried using Waze as an in-vehicle navigator, but it constantly pops-up nearly-full-screen ads for every imaginable thing along the route. They totally obscure the map and are very difficult to dismiss (must pick up the phone and carefully click just-so to get rid of the ad; basically impossible to do safely while driving). This is why I don't use Waze, and have stuck with Google Maps.

1. Looks like it's time to buy (a) Garmin device that might not be as smart, but doesn't spam me. (b) NTS - buy GRMN
2. No longer need anything like my Note 5 (primary app was Google Maps and GasBuddy), maybe a tiny iPhone is better?

Since my flirtation with Waze, I have been wondering, "When will Google push this horrible lossage into Maps?"
Wait no more, the future is here.
And it is crap-tastic!

Submission + - DOJ to Apple: We can do this the hard way, if you want (fortune.com)

cstacy writes: The Justice Department filed court papers last Thursday saying that Apple's rhetoric is "false" and "corrosive", and in a footnote, threatens to make them hand over both the iOS source code and Apple's signing key. "For the reasons discussed above, the FBI cannot itself modify the software on [the San Bernardino shooter’s] iPhone without access to the source code and Apple’s private electronic signature. The government did not seek to compel Apple to turn those over because it believed such a request would be less palatable to Apple. If Apple would prefer that course, however, that may provide an alternative that requires less labor by Apple programmers.”

Comment It's simple really (Score 1) 81

The FAA regulates flying (aircraft, pilots, airspace, etc.) but state government's regulate their land. The state is the authority on property zoning laws. They can't prevent you from flying over their land, but they can certainly prevent you from landing on it. They can regulate whether you can have an airport, grass landing strip, place to land a helicopter, etc. For another example, some states will fine you if you make an emergency landing on a road (and they will confiscate your aircraft). The FAA only gets involved in the land issues as it regards the construction and operation of airports/helipads. The state can most certainly tell you that you can't land a helicopter on your private land. (Which tells you something about how private your "private property" really is, if you weren't clear on the concept.)

Submission + - Marvin Minsky, R.I.P.

cstacy writes: Marvin Minsky, a founding father of Artificial Intelligence, died on Sunday, January 24, 2016 at the age of 88. He cofounded the MIT AI Lab in 1959, and was an inventor, mathematician, computer scientist, cognitive scientist, visionary, and musician who pioneered the field of AI. His latest books were “The Society of Mind” (1986) and “The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind,” (2006).

There are so many things to say about his life's work, the field of AI, and stories of how he inspired, taught, and mentored so many people.

Here are obits from The New York Times, and from MIT.

Comment What Is Really Going On (Score 1) 37

From the article, sounds like an air taxi company called Air Resources will be supplying helicopter service as usual. The helicopters happen to be made by Airbus. Air Resources will not only do the helicopter pickup/dropoff, but will also push buttons on the normal Uber app to hail the cars. (Normally they would call a limo car service on the phone, but instead they will call an unlicensed limo service on the app.) Uber has nothing to do with the helicopter part of it, really.

How this is different from the passenger pushing the buttons on the Uber app on their own phone is unclear, and at most, a very minor detail.

The whole thing is just random trivial hype.

Comment Re:NYC (Score 1) 37

The cost of helicopters is related to things like fuel, landing pads, helicopters being very high-precision things, and the fact that being a helicopter pilot is *hard*.

I don't believe that. I rode on a helicopter over the Mauna Loa caldera. Each group flew with minimal admin overhead. There was another helicopter tour company across the street, and yet another next door, so there was plenty of competition. I paid $150 for a one hour tour. That is a tiny fraction of a typical per-person booking fee for a helicopter in the SF Bay Area (where I live). The difference was low overhead and competition.

Tour rates will be different than "air taxi" rates in any event; they are regulated quite differently.

WIth a few minutes of searching, I could not find any advertised rates for helicopter air taxi rates in the Bay area.

Comment Re: And who pays? (Score 1) 145

Radar picks up clowns car 0.654m away, 0.612m away 40ms later, calculates whether a collision may occur, engages brake 5ms later, preventing collision.

What do you think will happen?

I think that about 6.12 secs later, 11.0 clowns will be pouring out of the clown car, and absolute hilarity will ensue!

Comment By "biggest", you mean "only" (Score 1) 555

Nobody is going to buy smart guns, except for Obama-mandated experimentation and "evaluation". No policeman or soldier will accept carrying a weapon that is so inherently unreliable. And for the same reasosn, the public won't want them, either.

Maybe in 50 or 100 years the technology will be good enough for a dependable smart gun. Of course, criminals in 100 years will still have regular dumb guns that can't be deactivated accidentally or by third parties...

Slashdot Top Deals

Maternity pay? Now every Tom, Dick and Harry will get pregnant. -- Malcolm Smith

Working...