Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Threshold (Score 4, Interesting) 409

Or, maybe we could all just work fewer hours per week. Which would leave more time for, you know, living.

I heard a story from a friend who works with refugees. One family, he found a good job for the father, got them settled, etc. After a few weeks the father had stopped going to work. My friend asked the father what had happened, was there a problem with the work? Was it too difficult to get to work? Did they not like you?
No, he said, it was none of these things. He stopped going to work because he realized his children were growing up without him and it was his responsibility to be home to take care of the family. Once that was accomplished, then he would go to work. This then, of course, led to conversations about having to pay for things you need for life and so on, but I think there is a grain of truth here.

Life != work and there would be plenty of great living to do outside of work.

Comment Re: coal plants still cause health damage (Score 1) 113

Using estimates from published research, the little coal-fired plant at the local university here in town, even though they use "clean" coal methods, still produces about $12 million in negative health impacts on people that live in the community. This primarily comes from fine particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrious oxide, and doesn't even include the cost of disposal of the coal ash. Major coal plants have a much larger impact on human health, particularly if they are located near population centers.

Comment Re:But why? (Score 2) 336

The goal is not to 'raise money to give money to the poor until they are no longer poor.' Rather, the goal is to create a society where people don't have suffer poverty - which is about high-quality, affordable education for all, accessible and affordable health care that doesn't bankrupt you when you get sick, an equitable society where all persons have opportunities regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or other minority status, and so on. R's and D's disagree substantially on many of the best strategies for these issues (take, affordable care act, for example).

Comment Re:Enough politics, back to the subject (Score 1) 284

I agree, having tried this a bit there is not much usefulness to what Twitter offers for research or data mining. But, then again, it's not intended to be a research tool. What it is intended to be, I suppose, as with all for-profit businesses, is a money-making machine. It seems to not do very well in that regard either.

Maybe if there is value to it as a service, it needs to go the non-profit route like Wikipedia?

Comment Re:What else would Google alter? (Score 1) 332

Exactly - when the government decides we have "always been at war with Eurasia," instead at war with "Eastasia," this version of the truth would then be listed at the top of the page rank.

What we need is education about how to use Google as a tool to support critical thinking and the analysis of evidence. Not to just click on the top link and assume whatever is in there is "the answer." Maybe Google should focus more on educating its users about how their system works and how to evaluate the quality of information you find by using their services than on arbitrarily re-ordering page ranks.

Comment Re:Good then bad then good (Score 1) 172

The consensus in the nutrition research boils down to two things:

1. Don't eat too much.

2. Eat mostly plants.

If you want to add a #3, it would be "exercise."

Other than those points, nutrition research says more about the scientists, the design of the studies, and the complexity of the human body than it does about what you should eat (and should generally be ignored).

Comment Re:You're being manipulated (Score 1) 1368

Not from TV, although PBS does offer some international news programs which focus on U.S. events from a very different perspective. If anything, Trump should be thanking the main news networks (both over the air and cable). They gave him thousands of hours of free coverage of his rallies, events, speeches, and even hours spent "waiting" for Trump to "do something." No other candidate even came close in free coverage.

Comment Re:yes they should (Score 1) 1081

The electoral college means the candidates don't campaign at all in the states where the outcome is a forgone conclusion. My state, for example, had hardly any visits or interest at all from either candidate because it was going to vote Republican. The only time we got any attention at all was brief stops to collect donation checks, but no real campaigning or advertising. If the popular vote mattered, what happened in full-on red and blue states would matter because your vote could still count toward your candidate's chance of winning (whereas my vote had no real impact whatsoever in a red state).

Comment Re:One party rule (Score 1) 2837

Who is going to pay the $2 million for your heart transplant (because, apparently, you don't have one)?
Or if you get hit by a bus and can't work any more?
Or if you get cancer and need chemo and need the same kind of immuno therapy?
That's how it works in society. I pay for you. You pay for me.

Slashdot Top Deals

Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir