Comment Re:trump supporters speak up. now is your chance (Score 1) 111
It's more candor than we've ever gotten from any FBI director, ever.
"candor"? I think you mean: arrogant, incompetent, macho, and unqualified.
It's more candor than we've ever gotten from any FBI director, ever.
"candor"? I think you mean: arrogant, incompetent, macho, and unqualified.
stop just accepting EULA that tell you they will sell your location data, and occasionally review which apps on your phone track your location?
Then many apps don't work or won't install. For example, there's an app to troubleshoot problems with my refrigerator (LG), but it requires access to precise location in order to operate. I just want the app to interpret the error code, not tell LG my location within a few meters. But precise location is *required* or the app won't work. Deleting it is not a solution because then I have to call the repair guy for a minimum $90 visit charge.
What I would like is the ability for my phone to spoof its location, for example to tell LG I'm at Apple Park in CA, so it thinks the location is working but it is just completely wrong.
Big tobacco did not shoved a cigarette into your mouth and make you smoke it. It really was a personal choice.
HAHAHAHA
Too funny
No seriously, that's funny.
Tobacco companies obviously can't literally shove a cigarette in your mouth. (But if they could have, they would have.)
They manipulated their products - intentionally - to make them more addictive.
They buried science and as much evidence as they could that even suggested a link between smoking and bad health. They produced their own "research" - often misleading or faked - that intentionally muddied the waters so they could say "the science is inconclusive!"
They fought all restrictions to where smoking was allowed - it was even allowed on airplanes! - so even if you "chose" not to smoke, you still inhaled it every time you went out into public.
Children in the homes of smokers never had a choice about whether to breathe smoke all day long, either!
Smoking was promoted relentlessly on movies, TV, magazines, and intentionally targeted those who were most easy to manipulate and addict - often children.
Tobacco companies DID make people smoke. My grandma died a long, horrible death from emphysema. She thought it was safe. She saw movie stars, doctors, "science" reports, smoking away...and after those first few packs, she was addicted with no real way out. How's that a "choice?"
Now they want a jury to clutch their pearls over “lies and deceit” while the same jury drove to the courthouse in petroleum-powered cars and will fly home on kerosene?
This is the exact same argument made by the tobacco industry. Everyone smoked! It was their choice! They could have quit any time!
Except the tobacco companies knew their product caused cancer and was addictive, and actively worked to make it even more addictive.
The oil and gas companies are no different. They sold a product that causes considerable damage to the place we call home, all while seeking to maximize their profit. And they knew the damage their product causes, and worked hard to bury and hide that damage, all while pushing for more and more and more use of their products, even when better alternatives are available.
Sorry, no sympathy at all from me for the oil and gas companies. Where are they going to spend all that profit when most of the world is a desert or under water?
you could bet on the outcome of U.S. or Canadian sports events somewhere else, in the U.K., Singapore or Austria
Yeah, but now it's your neighbor, your roommate, the random guy at the coffee shop who want to break your leg because you missed an inconsequential free-throw in last night's game...
Sports are supposed to be a fun, entertaining way to escape the nonsense and violence of the real world. With open sports gambling, they've invited the violence of the real world into the games and it just isn't as much fun any more.
Do we need police? This country didn't always have them, and they began life as an institution as slavecatchers.
Yes, we need people who enforce the law. There is good evidence that laws, and appropriate law enforcement makes a difference in reducing unwanted behaviors (such as auto theft).
Laws and law enforcement are not the ONLY things, obviously, that reduce crime. Having a good job, affordable housing, good nutrition, clean water, good schools, etc. all matter too. But laws and law enforcement are part of that puzzle.
What we DON'T need are a bunch of macho, cosplaying, psychopath, racist, bigoted, power-hungry zealots who are immune from the consequences of their actions.
And honestly, most people don't have a decent way to charge them
That is a solvable problem; China more than doubled its charging network in 18 months. It's a bit chicken-and-the-egg problem, but when chargers start showing up more in the U.S. people will demand cheap EVs, which will all be made by China. Honda is doomed.
The lady that tried to run a law enforcement officer over in her SUV? Justified....this happens when a civilian in a car/truck refuses to get out and hits the accelerator and puts officers in jeopardy. Sad, but 100% avoidable....if she hadn't been breaking the law and blocking traffic in the street in the first place, she never would have put herself in jeopardy....
The kill shot came when the officer was standing on the side of the SUV - he shot her in the head through the driver's side window. How is he going to get run over when he's standing BESIDE the vehicle? Your claim is total bullshit.
"Breaking the law" and "blocking traffic" are not capitol offenses, and no police force in the country would justify deadly force for someone "blocking traffic."
"I prefer rogues to imbeciles, because they sometimes take a rest." -- Alexandre Dumas (fils)