Why will they care about selling them at all if it means someone may not pay $120 brand new? Their main customers are video game addicts. They will still buy if the only alternative costs more.

I always found it curious how people can call down a government that does better things than their government. China is actually succeeding at making EVs reasonably affordable and functional for people. Here in North America we keep them mere toys for the wealthy. So who cares about the entire world more? Oh yes I suppose Trump did folly and make oil more expensive... Which helps China more than anyone because they have affordable EVs.

Seems really smart not to do the hard part.

You bought all those games cheaper because there is a used market that they are completing with. Once that used market goes away they have no reason to lower prices for older games.

But it's only sold cheap by Sony because you can get it cheap online. Why would they sell it cheap if there was no used market to compete with?

Will anyone even be able to get games that are 10 years old or so in 10 years? That's how you save money on games.

It's a chaotic algorithm. Chaos is going to happen.

So in other words, both AIs did exactly what they were designed to do?

Honestly, I think it comes down to the ruling class having power over, and making a lot more than, the plebs at the bottom. They truly hate us.

The 4 day work week is a logical fallacy. At what point do companies decide to give regular employees more pay for less work? At a time when they don't really need as many employees. That's never going to happen. They have never felt any obligation to share the rewards of productivity.

Sorry I realized my phone dropped the 'P' in President.

Ok Trump rapes someone and gets off Scott free and you still think laws matter.

The same goes for groceries. They should just let everyone buy milk and meat from every store because the sooner someone dies of food poisoning the better. Yet the system works because people can choose to stay at the well known store and usually do. If you buy food from a guy with a grocery store in his truck and you get food poisoning that's on you.

The fault with statistics in the basketball example is that you are only looking at the population. To correctly analyze from a statistical perspective for any hiring you must take into account the qualification for a job. If a basketball player must be at least 6-6, do a jump shot better than anyone else and hit a 3 pointer better than anyone else then it probably doesn't look as racist. To put it another way, racism is an assumption based on race. But if the statistics prove they are actually better in general and that's just how it is then that's not racist.

Absolute wealth corrupts absolutely.