Comment RHEL versus Debian philosophy? (Score 5, Interesting) 51
With RHEL 10 adding more complex stuff like Lightspeed and immutable kernels, it is starting to have a lot more moving parts. RHEL used to be the production choice, but as time went on, there is a lot of oddball stuff, and oddball decisions made. For example, even though Fedora has btrfs, RHEL doesn't have btrfs, even as a -supported- option. (Yes, you can slap ZFS on it, but supported is the big thing).
Debian, on the other hand, doesn't have snaps, flatpaks, or other subsystems present by default. It "just works" out of the box. Plus, other systems like Proxmox can be installed on vanilla Debian with ease.
I would assert that because that fewer moving parts are needed, it makes things easier. You can take filesystem snapshots without Stratis, for example.