It's actually nothing new.

I can recall back to Nixon where the same suspects used the same type of language for him and every R afterwards. There is absolutely nothing special or different how they see or talk about Trump.

It is -exactly- the same as how they have talked about -every- Republican and conservative for 50+ years. The only thing that changes is the name.

After Trump is dead they'll use the same language for JDV or whoever had an R next to their name. The person is just a place holder for their mindless hate.

It took years for dumb western execs and politicians to send manufacturing to China.

It'll take years to bring it back.

China didn't magically just know how to build stuff. They were rice farmers. We taught them. We're not incapable of training the next generation.

Start by ending the free money for healthy job capable adults in the West. They'll find something useful to do instead of smoking out and having more government funded children.

Generally men don't like tattoos. In a spouse or serious girlfriend. I'm in that bucket with 99% of men.

However, when I was at university, tattoos were a mating call. The more tattoos, piercings, weird hair and make up, drug use, alcoholism, etc, all the vices, a girl displayed the easier it was to get NSA sex. Pretty much just say hi, flirt heavily, tell them how great their tattoos look and the panties dropped most of the time.

But no never date that girl. Just straight to bed and leave when done. Most of them considered it a flex they could fuck the way guys do and made themselves available for on demand repeats.

So yes most men hate tattoos but context is critical.

What if you got professional help and got over your paranoid delusions that Trump is going to do anything besides enforce existing laws and clean up the Biden autopen mess?

Then your lefty friends would cancel you but millions of normal healthy people would stop ignoring you. You'd have a normal happy healthy life where some random old guy isn't your boogeyman.

Yes, I read just yesterday in DU that Trump is experimenting on children. Personally. But not white Christian children. You're next in line when he runs out of Black kids.

The lady doth protest too much. You're splitting hairs to avoid the embarrassment of being outed as a Democrat.

You're a straw manning, ad hominem spewing Democrat.

Back to where this started: I'd be embarrassed to be a Democrat, too. You're clearly embarrassed to be associated with the Democrat party clown show. You've always voted Democrat. You're a Democrat.

Like you claim, I've also been registered Independent most of my life but if you called me a Republican I wouldn't rail against it for multiple lengthy posts because I am a moderate conservative which is often synonymous with being Republican to most people. I wouldn't be embarrassed if someone thought I was Republican in the same way you are embarrassed being a Democrat,

You're a Democrat. Revel in your party's clown show.

Since you're obviously deeply concerned with labels, as Democrats generally are, I am opposed to parties entirely. I've always believed the party system is one of the worst aspects of our system. They're not in the USC yet they have somehow made themselves effectively enshrined in the system. If you were intellectually honest (lolol, I've been reading your silly posts for years) you wouldn't cry so hard about what party you're in (Democrat) but that parties shouldn't exist at all.

As far as the proper use of rhetorical terms, you're just wrong. You need a better education than some random web pages you copied some Latin words from before you try to "educate" your superiors when using those big words you think you understand. But don't. I'm not here to teach the unteachable. Few Democrats are teachable. Including you.

Why do you use sucking cock as a slam? You hate gay men? Homophobic much? Typical. Conservatives judge people based on their merit. Democrats judge people based on immutable traits like sexual preference, skin color, where they were born, who their parents are, etc.

It's also weird how you think being wealthy means you can't be a Democrat. The Democrats are the party of the rich and have been for a long time. Union bosses support your Democrat party. Union workers do not. Not anymore. My parents were Democrat voters. My dad was even a card carrying communist during the McCarthy era Abe got grabbed for a trial. But they grew out of it.

Stop fighting so hard against the obvious. When you vote 99% Democrat... you're a Democrat. And an ill educated, Dunning-Kruger, homophobic one at that. Yermom would be proud!

It's not 100% effective. So we shouldn't use it at all.

Which military system do you know of that's 100% effective?

I didn't say you're a communist.

I didn't say you're a coastal elite or any of that other straw man bullshit you put in my mouth.

You're a Democrat.

Have you ever voted for a Republican?

How many not-Democrats have you EVER voted for at ANY level?

Your inability to understand basic English and resort to ad hominem and strawman is because you're a Democrat and a moron. But now I'm being redundant.

You are a Democrat.

Nothing was Biden's fault. He was suffering from dementia before 2020.

It was the fault of those around him, however. People should be wearing orange for the huge fraud committed on the American people.

I'd be embarrassed to admit to being a Democrat, too.

Google reviews are just like Amazon reviews and anywhere else. They're crap and mostly astroturfed by the company themselves.

Adding anonymous reviews won't improve review quality. It'll just leave small businesses unable to defend themselves or respond to random Karens who didn't feel they were treated special enough.

I love seeing bad reviews where the small businesses owner responds and we find out the reviewer was some Karen making shit up or not telling the whole story. This new review system will just encourage more Karens to destroy small local businesses but leave owners unable to respond if they don't know who the Karen is.

No one can explain what AGI would really be. That's the point. I've posted exactly that several times but you're not paying attention just looking to play gotcha games so you can feel smart.

There is no such thing as AGI that isn't biological. No one has done it, no one has made any real progress on it, it's just sci-fi that can't even be explained in proper technical terms that aren't philosophical and fuzzy feel good.

LLM is well understood and explainable but not AGI.

Did you feel you 'caught' me on something and feel smart now? You didn't. But I do look forward to your explanation for what AGI is. If you can figure it out maybe someone will give you a Nobel prize or something. Good luck.

I was a Unix admin before Linus wrote the first line of Linux. It still isn't ready for the desktop for 99% of people.

This unfortunate fact is the only reason Windows still exists.

Pre-loading is a shitty hack to partially make up for windows bloat.

Almost everyone has an SSD but file exploring needs to be pre-loaded?

We have way more than 640k so Microsoft is going to steal it to speed up their crap?

None of my third party apps n games waste -my- resources pre-loading to make up for their shit coding but Microsoft thinks this is a good idea rather than just fixing their shit. I see this as a form of theft.

My computer hardware was way slower when I had 3.1 and 95 yet performed fine without pre-loading anything. Now they stuffed so much useless crap in there and made it nearly impossible to identify and disable that they need even more hardware just to not seem like the shit OS they're shoveling.

We don't need pre-loading. We need a slimmer OS that defaults to "no extra crap loading or running behind our backs tracking us and sending our info to Microsoft".

There is no path from LLM to AGI. No relationship between them.

It's like saying, "as soon as we master cheese making tech we can go to the moon".

They uses one of the same technical words but it stops there.

Uh, yes, I think we're agreeing here.

If I buy a healthy stock my cost is the stock. If it goes up, yay. If it goes down, I have a paper loss but don't have to do anything. I can ride it out long term as generally a healthy company will go up. No decision necessary for short term volatility price shifts.

If I short sell, I have to cover if it goes up or I can spend additional money on options to limit my loss but I can also be whipsawed into a real loss in a volatile market. Stock can go up for stupid or no reason. Then I have to decide to execute my options, take the loss due to volatility, then watch it drop over the long term where I believed it would go originally except I'm out and lost money due to short term price shifts. If I don't execute my options then I need to cover. Either way, I need to make a decision if it goes up after I short.

Short selling is for inside traders and people who have a high risk acceptance investing profile (and can afford those losses from being wrong or whipsawed). There are many more short traders than short traders who can afford to short trade.

I am not opposed to shorting, just not for me.