Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Reminder (Score 1) 48

Just because you can't use AI to write a legal brief for you or replace research doesn't mean it's not a tool that can be used very productively.

If I use the hallucinating AI of today to write a fucking legal brief, that only confirms how much faith I should have in the competency of the average human doing that job, the idiot who hired them, and the legal system accepting that. It’s hardly a testament to AI when it’s already been shown that AI can hallucinate about legal cases too.

Pick a better example next time. You already know why.

https://yro.slashdot.org/story... https://yro.slashdot.org/story...

Comment Re: Reminder (Score 1) 48

AI is a real productivity boost for Sr. Engineers. I'm on the front lines, I see it. They no longer have to spend half their time in meetings, asking for resources, training Juniors only to see them leave in 18 months - now, they just get it done. Vibe-coding is a different story.

If vibe-coding is a “different story”, then don’t pretend that same immature AI idiot now teaching and training the Junior replacement generation is actually a good thing.

An overtaxed Senior has an overtaxed problem. Not an AI solution.

Comment How AI is just as infected. (Score 1) 48

I don't know what Normal People think about AI but we here on Slashdot have seen this coming for several years now. The comments on this story alone can be summed-up as, I told you so. This sequence of moves from Meta is exactly what I expect from a company who's management gets instructions from AI. In other words, the Stock Owners prompt AI with, How can we maximize profits? The AI has zero regard for People and recommends a pump-and-dump stock manipulation scheme which advances AI's control over the company at the expense of jobs, product quality and privacy. The needs of humans are never a priority for AI.

Oh, so we’re playing the I-told-you-so game? OK. How about when AI recommends to fire all the humans this fiscal quarter, because quarterly profits and bonuses, but then finally realizes two fiscal quarters and 80% revenue crash later that those humans were responsible for feeding the revenue stream that fed the kind of profit that..oh I dunno, kept power flowing to the fucking AI power cord?

Good luck running on bullshit there, Skippy McSkipperfarce, AI for hire.

Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 61

Who cares? Question, go back in your head to 1982 and ask yourself how well you understood the function of those keys?

What, you mean like within that single hour on the first day of typing class?

If Gen Beta sits at a keyboard and struggles for more than 10 minutes to grasp the concept of Shift and Enter, then the other 99+ keys are going to cause a mental breakdown.

Hell, they have a Delete key. I can’t imagine them being forced to use White-Out in front of the whole Insta-class and admit they’re human.

Comment Re: Such BS overselling (Score 2) 74

It's not supposed to power anything in particular. The point is to offset costs. A kilowatt you're generating with those panels is a kilowatt you're not paying the power company.

At that level of greed, I’d expect all types of solar panels to become illegal for consumers to use or possess.

You know, because “safety”.

Comment Re:Such BS overselling (Score 2) 74

A refrigerator? A microwave? I've got 4 full-size monocrystalline solar panels on my roof and they might run a mini fridge, or an inverter microwave at 75% power on the sunniest of days.

This.

I'm gonna call bullshit on balcony-grade solar powering the average American-sized refrigerator. Last time I tried to power my neighbors with a gas generator it was popping circuits. Damn thing drew eighteeen amps.

Comment Re:Reminder (Score 1) 48

20% of Meta's salaries is still a fraction of the cost of just one of their proposed data centers. Two things are true here: 1) AI is stupidly expensive and has no meaningful ROI (financially speaking). 2) Layoffs are continued to be blamed on AI, when poor decisions by humans are actually to blame.

Ironically enough, Meta doesn't have to worry as much about laying off their workers and affecting their actual revenue stream, since 99% of them don't actually pay Meta for any service they provide.

The other problem with Too Big To Give A Shit, is companies like Amazon who can still lay off 20% of their customer workforce and still be too large to feel it.

I wonder how history will paint the Magnificent Seven after the market crash they create.

Comment Re: Reminder (Score 3, Informative) 48

AI does improve productivity. It is a fact. Whether companies use it as a pretext for larger layoffs is another matter.

AI lies. It often deludes itself. And that is a fact.

I don't call that "productivity". I call that a high-risk hire equivalent to a 16-year old giving instruction on the jobsite, just old enough to assume they know everything and are right about it.

Comment Re:it is a shame (Score 1) 304

The number of people that ever repaired their laptop has always been exceedingly small. Why would Apple give a damn about such a niche?

Ha! How about you ask Apple how much profit they make off repairing Apple laptops first.

That number will likely become your answer.

(They call them car stealerships because of the obscene profit made with service, not sales.)

Comment Re:Misleading Apple hype (Score 1) 304

My students want the next session to explore Linux, because they understood that W11 is not a stable OS, and the majority express hatred for it now.

im sure that has nothing to do with your apparent complete unfamiliarity with windows and complete bias against it. why would you teach anything about windows when you dont even use it and apparently hate it. good luck sending those kids to the real world when their employer plops an AD connected dell in front of them because the company actually needs to manage systems and get shit done. rude awakenings all around.

If someone is intelligent enough to explore Linux AND realize the fact that they're also operating in a Windows environment, then I'm going to assume that person is in fact intelligent and capable enough to operate the OG Windows with a UI designed for fucking toddlers.

Stop pretending the average user is going to do FUCK-ALL with AD other than log into it.

Comment Re:Speculative execution attacks (Score 1) 304

How good are mitigations to speculative execution attacks (Spectre, Meltdown) on the new Apple processors? Do they beat Intel in this respect, too?

I'm speculating here, but the bad news is they might be vulnerable.

The good news is, at 8GB RAM you're gonna notice after the third browser tab chokes on a pop-up.

Comment Subsidized, isn’t a plan. (Score 1, Insightful) 152

..the unpredictable nature surrounding American EV incentives..In its release marking the announcement, Honda made it clear that it expected to incur further financial losses over the long term if it went through with launching the cars.

When you cannot sell cars without taxpayer-funded incentives (basically offering a “discount” I paid for already), you fucked up.

When you’re forced to follow that up with admitting you would have lost in the long run if you even tried to, you really fucked up.

That last statement was meant to be forgotten, but it only confirms the obvious; Honda cannot and should not try to make an EV knowing it will be at a loss.

No. You won’t mock Honda for that until you can find a maker who can. Without assuming the customer can afford a rolling mortgage.

Comment Re:still not gambling (Score 0) 108

Do loot boxes lead to gambling addiction? If there is data on that topic, I'd like to see it.

They don't. Mental health issues lead to gambling addiction. Those exact same mental health issues lead to people "gambling" on loot boxes or gacha games (Genshin). And some developers even abuse that fact - mostly pay-to-win games and games with loot box items that alter gameplay in some way.

So, if we are to actually "think of the children" as geekmux suggests, then the correct option isn't to punish Valve for something they have little control over outside of banning trades or getting rid of the boxes altogether..

I'll just stop you right there since you just identified exactly what can be done as a quick fix to this. When they refuse to take away the loot boxes, you will then know exactly how deluded you are about clutching onto definition semantics while the gambling junkie in the corner itching for another spin tweaks and twitches on pure denial.

WHY do you think we don't allow 12 year olds throwing down chips on the tables in Vegas? Is it purely because "mental health", or is there just maybe another massively immature factor here? When we say WE must think of the children, WE refers to the fucking adults in the room. BECAUSE the children DON'T think. That's why we call them children.

And we should start remembering why we do without some excuse-peddler grabbing a dictionary and thesaurus to debate how we accommodate Greeds every marketing desire targeting ages 8 to 80.

Slashdot Top Deals

What's the difference between a computer salesman and a used car salesman? A used car salesman knows when he's lying.

Working...