Same way banks do today: I wouldn't. I'd eliminate the risk systemically by either making them not dischargeable, or by being too big to fail.

Maybe they are reading your comments on this site.

All evidence so far points to nobody knowing.

The vacancy rate in China is only twice the vacancy rate in the US, and the US supposedly has a housing shortage.

Well, given that Alexander Nix was never personally fined, I'd say are still reluctant to say Facebook and Cambridge Analytica did anything wrong at all.

Maybe they should do this for cars as well. For safety.

If I ever see a car fully change lanes like they are supposed to when overtaking a cyclist legally riding in a traffic lane, I'll eat my hat. Police do nothing. What we should do is confiscate the automobiles who fail to obey the law, right?

You have no idea what you are talking about. The Chinese mode of production for supply chains is actually more decentralized than in the US. Industry heavyweights in the US that have pricing power exert more control over their suppliers than their Chinese counterparts do over theirs.

All of these devices should be legally required to include their schematics. Incorrect schematics should incur a hefty fine.

Because you live in a society that is still on it.

Feel free to elaborate if you think you can.

This is not true. Qualified dividends are taxed as capital gains.

Sure, lets give smart people even more reason to go into finance instead of science. Its been working out so well for the past 50 years. /s

Even if you could make it stop using OneDrive, it would change it back every tuesday.

Today that's the case, but I'm talking about initial adoption. People with ipods who purchased music on itunes would risk needing to re-buy all of their music if their first smartphone was LG's instead of Apple's.