Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Amazon is Opening a Supermarket With No Cashiers. Is Whole Foods Next? (vox.com) 138

Two years ago, Amazon introduced the idea of high-tech, cashierless shopping with a store that was a cross between a 7-Eleven and a Pret A Manger sandwich shop. Now, Amazon is bringing the same concept to its full-size supermarket. On Tuesday, Amazon will open the doors to a 10,000-square-foot Amazon Go Grocery store in Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood, less than a mile from the tech giant's downtown Seattle headquarters. From a report: It'll be stocked with 5,000 different products -- from organic fruit to grass-fed beef -- and outfitted with cameras, sensors, and computer vision that eliminate the need for shoppers to fork over cash or plastic before walking out the door with their groceries. The new store, which is the first of its kind in the US, highlights Amazon's unsated appetite for gobbling up market share in the $900 billion US grocery industry, even after spending nearly $14 billion in 2017 to acquire Whole Foods and making same-day grocery delivery a free perk for Prime members last year. At the same time, the expansion of the cashierless store concept raises the question of when -- not if -- the technology will be ready for installation in Whole Foods stores, and what might happen to the chain's thousands of cashiers when it is.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon is Opening a Supermarket With No Cashiers. Is Whole Foods Next?

Comments Filter:
  • If I'm going to have to do all my own bagging and ringing-up, I'd damned well better be compensated for it.

    Yes, that sounds entitled, but in all honesty, if I can get that courtesy elsewhere for the same price, I'll go get that courtesy elsewhere.

    • Robots don't pay taxes, either.

      • by uncqual ( 836337 )

        The people who make and maintain the robots receive wages and pay taxes.

        In the same sense that robots "don't pay taxes", excavators and jackhammers "don't pay taxes". Are you suggesting that we should stop using excavators and jackhammers and instead rely on ditchdiggers with shovels and sledgehammers? Come to think of it, shovels and sledgehammers "don't pay taxes" so perhaps we should make the ditchdiggers dig trenches and break rock with their bare hands.

        The notion of having a manned checkstand at a stor

        • The people that constructed you and I paid wages.

          The cashiers and others that these "robots" replaced payed wages, as did those that managed them.

          You don't like "quaint"? Read Vonnegut's Welcome To The Monkeyhouse". It's one of many tomes that can tell you the long-tail of automation.

          I'm not a Luddite, but I'm fully aware at the plutocracy we now enjoy, and at the top of that ladder, the richest man in the world.

          Get real.

          • by uncqual ( 836337 )

            Perhaps at some point groups of people will choose to eschew technology and establish and live on self supporting communes with no outside resources. Or, they may decide to boycott businesses like Amazon or others that use technology to replace human workers.

            This has little to do with plutocracy, it has to do with consumers (as they pretty much always have) seeking the least expensive and most convenient source of goods and services. Yes, a few large efficient organizations tend to dominate markets and less

            • Communities make a least-common-denominator, and communes are more insular.

              There is dignity in work, and dignity is a human basic (despite those that would spend it). That's not a Wesleyan attitude, rather, people like to be useful and contribute, generally. We know the exceptions.

              To pay for services provided by heavily automation-produced goods and services, they in turn, must have a source of income. A basic universal income idea is now in experiments. This UBI doesn't also have common-good-taxes. Like it

        • In the same sense that robots "don't pay taxes", excavators and jackhammers "don't pay taxes". Are you suggesting that we should stop using excavators and jackhammers and instead rely on ditchdiggers with shovels and sledgehammers?

          They key difference here being that those tools were made to make men more productive in their work. The jackhammer didn't replace the man wielding the shovel. It was just a newer, better tool. That's why this isn't just new tools, it's a revolution, because the point of automation is not to make people better workers, but to replace them outright. The end goal is no more humans doing these jobs. And no one has found a way to replace those jobs. Unlike past eras, where new tech created as many jobs as it at

          • by uncqual ( 836337 )

            The excavator (originally a "steam shovel") certainly has replaced most ditch diggers. Ditch diggers needed no education, minimal intellectual capabilities, and very little training. An excavator operator in a $300K+ machine is a much more skilled job with much higher responsibility and education, training, and intellectual requirements. Jackhammers are often now an attachment on a general purpose excavator for any serious work rather than something wrestled into position by a person's muscles.

            In the case o

    • by guruevi ( 827432 )

      Supposedly it will lower the pricing. You spend approx. 10 minutes in front of a cashier, that is ~$5 in wages, benefits etc every time you go shopping. The cashier station costs a few thousands as well. You'll also have more throughput so your stores can be smaller.

      • by bjwest ( 14070 )

        Supposedly it will lower the pricing..

        Hahahahaha... You don't know corporate America, do you? Prices will go up to "recover the cost of the scanners" and the profits will go to buy a new yacht for the CEO.

      • by uncqual ( 836337 )

        And think of the ecological benefits of having smaller stores with fewer employees. Less energy to heat/cool, less energy to build, way less energy consumed by employee treking to/from the store to serve their shifts. Even slightly less energy for customers to access as smaller retail outlets allows them to be more tightly packed.

        The Green New Deal should include banning all human work that can be done, full-lifecycle, with a smaller carbon footprint using automation.

        Wont' someone think of the planet?

    • by paazin ( 719486 )

      If I'm going to have to do all my own bagging and ringing-up, I'd damned well better be compensated for it.

      You're already doing that if you're shopping at the grocery store a block away from this new Amazon construction.

      Welcome to 21st-century Seattle.

    • by fermion ( 181285 )
      If I am going to have to pick my own fruit and vegetables I better be compensated for it. I want a dedicated server behind the counter to hand me my product.

      As wages rise, at least for some, and pressure to lower prices is always major, the eficiencias increase. The problem we have now is that we still need to scan and pay, which I always have trouble as this is not my job and the payment machine never seems to work.

      The nice thing about the amazon store is that you picked and are charged on e it, so the

      • If I am going to have to pick my own fruit and vegetables I better be compensated for it. I want a dedicated server behind the counter to hand me my product.

        Prior to the 1880s, this is how shopping actually worked. You went to the counter at the front of the shop, handed your list to a clerk, who then went into the storeroom to pick your items off the shelf.

        Woolworths was the first shop to allow customers into the "store" to pick their own items.

        So the Luddites objecting to scanning and bagging their items should also object to having to pick them from the shelves.

        • by Kjella ( 173770 )

          Prior to the 1880s, this is how shopping actually worked. You went to the counter at the front of the shop, handed your list to a clerk, who then went into the storeroom to pick your items off the shelf. Woolworths was the first shop to allow customers into the "store" to pick their own items.

          That's what I had to do at liquor stores here in Norway in the late 90s, letting us browse the merchandise could entice us to buy more. Two year trial started in 1999, ten years after that every liquor store in the country had switched to self picking. Good riddance. You still can't buy anything through self service though not even beer at a regular store, because the law says you can't sell beer to a visibly intoxicated person and no id scanner/fingerprint reader can verify that you're sober enough. So the

      • by uncqual ( 836337 )

        The problem we have now is that we still need to scan and pay, which I always have trouble as this is not my job and the payment machine never seems to work.

        You must be going to different markets than I do. When available, I always use self-checkout and have very few problems. Although, at one chain store, I can't possibly figure out how it can take so long for the system to actually decide that "Yes, you did scan the bananas that are on the scale, I've displayed the weight -- now if only the poor computer

      • by jtara ( 133429 )

        If I am going to have to pick my own fruit and vegetables I better be compensated for it. I want a dedicated server behind the counter to hand me my product.

        Where the hell do you shop where a clerk hands you fruits and vegetables?

        “Tops on or off?” (Carrots)

        FWIW I shop at a fruit and vegetable warehouse that is also open to the public. Everything is at least 3 days fresher, and kept in ideal conditions (take a warm jacket!) You sign a waiver and they give you surgical gloves. There are no prices. You review the prices at checkout, and they will cheerfully return anything that gives you nosebleed (that exotic Japanese melon. That pound of vanilla bean

  • This /. post should use the Guy Fawkes mask icon.
    The shoppers in that store should all wear that while shopping.
    Then shuffle some carts around between them.
    Let's see how the good their computer vision system is.

    • The shoppers in that store should all wear that while shopping. Then shuffle some carts around between them.

      So two people go into that store.

      The first person puts some expensive stuff their cart. The second one puts in some cheap stuff.

      Then they switch carts.

      The second person walks out and pays the price for the cheap stuff . . . although the cart has expensive stuff.

      The second one walks out but makes a fuss about the expensive bill for the cheap stuff, and also just pays for the cheap stuff.

      But the folks at Amazon have probably already thought of that trick.

      Although, you should never underestimate the ing

    • Re:Guy Fawkes mask (Score:4, Interesting)

      by cusco ( 717999 ) <brian@bixby.gmail@com> on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @11:46AM (#59765086)

      I work in Amazon's physical security, when the first Go store opened a block from our office three of my co-irkers decided to game the system. They tried almost every day for two weeks, working individually or as a group, and never got any free stuff and never got overcharged. I was honestly impressed.

      • There's a current article on one of the on-line tech mags.
          The writer was able to defeat the system and steal produce by putting on sunglasses and a sweater change in the bathroom. After that, nothing he picked up got charged.
        He included a photo of the receipt showing a two and a half hour shop time (actual was half an hour).

    • It's all fun and games until Hallowe'en happens...

  • Brother, our operation to ensure that all citizens must carry, at all times, an approved Telescreen (whose euphemism, so-called "smart" so-called "telephones" we have successfully integrated into Newspeak), is proceeding apace. Soon, no citizen will dare venture from their bed with anything like a mere "flip-phone" or -- MinTruth forbid! -- without a Telescreen at all.
    • Brother, our operation to ensure that all citizens must carry, at all times, an approved Telescreen (whose euphemism, so-called "smart" so-called "telephones" we have successfully integrated into Newspeak), is proceeding apace. Soon, no citizen will dare venture from their bed with anything like a mere "flip-phone" or -- MinTruth forbid! -- without a Telescreen at all.

      Based on your subject line ... I thought you were going to give us some respite from the two-minutes hates of Amazon, but apparently no.

  • I'd never heard of the "same day groceries" for Prime members mentioned in the summary, so did some checking. No idea where that comes from, it certainly isn't available to me as a prime member. Maybe only in select markets?
    The best they do is "next day" delivery on a few items.
    For the things I normally buy, they only offer 2-day delivery at about twice what my local grocery store charges. So groceries from Amazon aren't a realistic option for me. Not sure what other Prime customers experience is.

    • It is called "Prime Now". primenow.amazon.com. I've never used it, but they say free 2-hour delivery.

    • It is only in select markets, typically near their distribution facilities. For example, I can get Amazon Prime Now 2 hour delivery at work but not at home.
      • by jtara ( 133429 )

        It is only in select markets, typically near their distribution facilities.

        Hahahahahaha!

        “Distribution facilities” = nearest Whole Foods. In “select markets”. (Which, unfortunately, I am in).

        They turned the in-house fast food restaurant of mine (no big loss) into a “distribution center” (blocking the streets of a neighborhood retail district).

        I loved how one day the parking cops ticketed a whole row of illegally-parked delivery drivers and I lauuuuuuuughed!! Easy pickings!

  • by rldp ( 6381096 ) on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @10:52AM (#59764870)

    Wow holy moley!

    How much for asparagus water?

  • Thank you, Amazon! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @10:53AM (#59764878)
    I don't understand Amazon sycophants. Does nobody see a problem with have ONE retailer? Does nobody see a problem not having stores any more? Is everybody OK with giving one company so much control over their lives?

    I think that the sudden flood of entertainment & convenience has completely overwhelmed most people's ability to thing rationally. I have no other way to explain what's going with Americans today.
    • I don't get it. It is still a store. The grocery chains are all owned by mega-corporations (in the US many are foreign owned). What is the difference if that mega-corporation is Amazon (750,000), or Ahold Delhaize (who probably owns your local grocery and has 372,000 employees).

      • by DogDude ( 805747 )
        People don't buy their clothes and electronics and appliances and furniture and books and entertainment through grocery stores.
        • Sure they do. Walmart. Target. Costco. Sams Club. They all have grocery stores in their stores, along with all the other junk. Welcome to America.

    • Thinking rationally about the present situation is fscking depressing. The value of labor is heading to zero and wealth is getting concentrated in fewer and fewer hands whether we're "OK with it" or not.
      • by DogDude ( 805747 )
        wealth is getting concentrated in fewer and fewer hands whether we're "OK with it" or not.

        You're 100% correct, but I want to point out that it doesn't have to be the case if individuals made good choices (shop local, use cash), but people don't.
    • No one will care about the 'one store' problem until it bites us in the ass. Until then, as long as people get what they want on a whim they will happily continue on.

      It's the same type of problem with depending on another country to make all your base products, which we may soon see that problem first hand if CoronaVirus continues to cause problems for China.
    • Does nobody see a problem with have ONE retailer?

      Wall Street doesn't. And what's good for Wall Street is good for America! What are you, a socialist?

    • There isn't ONE retailer, though. Amazon's the dominant online retailer sure, but even there they're hardly the only one. I rely on Newegg and Monoprice pretty heavily for technology and while I don't use them, TigerDirect is also out there. I'm sure other kinds of goods have their own specialty sites like those. For more general purposes, the big box stores also have their own online ordering system, even if it's not as popular. And speaking of big box stores, they still completely dominate offline retail
  • What could go wrong?
  • I'm often depressed at these news stories that bemoan the loss of jobs in the face of technological improvement. Yes, some grocery store cashiers will no longer be needed - although some will still have to be around to manage the automated checkouts. You're still going to need people stocking shelves, cleaning, doing administrative tasks, etc. And right now with the proliferation of automated checkouts, we're already seeing fewer of those jobs needed. Which is fine, because for the most part these are prett
    • I'm often depressed at these news stories that bemoan the loss of jobs in the face of technological improvement.

      America is suffering from a labor shortage. We need to move people out of low wage dead-end jobs in retail, and into more productive jobs so businesses can expand and the economy can grow.

      What should depress you is seeing a cashier repetitively scanning and bagging products. It is pathetic that a human mind is wasted on such drudgery.

  • Maybe in the big city this a supermarket, but out here in the boonies, the 7-11 is bigger. The nearest supermarket to me (a Shaws) is, I would guess, 40-50000 square feet, and the new Hannaford's could be half again as large, and that's just the retail floor space - add in storage and the butcher and the bakery, it might cover two acres.
    • And the average supermarket has 40,000 to 50,000 SKUs (stock keeping units), not 5,000

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      10,000 square feet will probably make it the largest retail space on Capital Hill, some of the most overpriced real estate in the Puget Sound area. They must be expecting a massive amount of traffic through that store to support the rent.

  • Hello Mr Jones, on Saturday at 2:34pm you shopped at Amazon Grocer and you looked at Widget Flakes for 1.26 seconds. For completing this short survey we on behalf of Widget Flakes would send you a 50% off coupon...

  • Yes, I know ALDI is owned by a completely different company (which also owns Trader Joe's). Yes, I know they target completely different ends of the socioeconomic spectrum. However we're not going to see Whole Foods go cashier-less as it is counter to their brand. We will see ALDI do it though, as it is well in line with theirs.

    ALDI already has the minimum staffing required for a functioning store. Having a customer-employee interaction at one is rare, aside from the standard pleasantries at the che
    • Yes, I know ALDI is owned by a completely different company (which also owns Trader Joe's)

      Aldi is owned by two different companies. One of them owns Aldi stores in the US. The other one owns Trader Joe's. They originally split over the decision on whether to sell cigarettes.

  • ...walking in, filling my bag with stuff, walking out?

    Presumably there's security but how will they know you've paid or not if its all done by RFID tag and bluetooth? Does an alarm go off if goods the system thinks haven't been paid for are taken past a barrier?

    This is a genuine question having never seen one of these places.

    • by gtall ( 79522 )

      Actually, what happens is a little blue robot in questionably appropriate lingerie come dashing madly towards you waving its little appendages and in your mother's voice says: put that back before anyone notices. You didn't think your personal data on your mother was going to waste, did you?

    • ...walking in, filling my bag with stuff, walking out?

      That's pretty much how it is supposed to work. Haven't tried it, but from inspection of the other store they have on First Hill, it is all done by your phone app which presumably has a credit card registered with your account. Entrance is gated, so you can't even get in, let alone out if you don't have the app installed on your phone and it finds no issue with what you ware doing. The gates are those RFID type things they have at other stores but instead of just an alarm, they actually control a gate that a

  • The promise of automation is to reduce the tedium and drudgery of everyday life. To free up time for other pursuits.
    Instead it is used to free up capitalists from paying workers.

    Those workers are indeed left with more free time, but no way to effectively use it in a society that has left the value of their labor behind and discarded the laborers with it.

    This is a major societal issue. You can blather about new jobs and unimagined industries being created, but even if they are at the same rate (they are

  • by Applehu Akbar ( 2968043 ) on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @12:23PM (#59765254)

    The architects have set up twenty checkout lanes, but at most two are actually personed. They want people to get used to using the self-checkout, so let's focus on making self-checkout easier to use. Put the two remaining employees to work weighing and coding purchases in the produce and bakery departments. Setting it up so that you can push coupons through a slot would eliminate an employee callout to scan coupons. Having custome loyalty cards include your birthdate would eliminate another employee callout to verify that yes, the person buying a bottle wine has a gray beard.

  • The cost of having a completely automated store is about to dip below paying someone $15.00 per hour and those jobs are going to be automated out of existence. Those unskilled and low skilled workers are about to go from $9.00 to unemployed.

  • Amazon respects the law, Betteridge's law to be precise.

  • In the Boston, US area Stop & Shop has a little handheld scanner that you can carry with you. I just scan every item before I bag it at the cart, then walk up to a self checkout. I scan a little barcode on the scanner itself and then all my items get rung up in a few seconds. Total checkout time is maybe 60 seconds. Very convenient. I'm sure it's widespread, I just don't usually go grocery shopping outside of the area.

  • Back in the atomic age, it was suggested that supermarkets simply irradiate all the food, so you can add up all your purchases with a geiger counter. To mark up the price, just irradiate the item a little harder. The irradiation kills bacteria and makes the shelf-life of the products better, plus, as the food approaches the sell-by-date, radioactive decay makes the item get cheaper over time.

    Using cameras, sensors, and computer vision sounds so much more complicated and intrusive.

"Facts are stupid things." -- President Ronald Reagan (a blooper from his speeach at the '88 GOP convention)

Working...