Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Good (Score 1) 75

The more competition in that space the better.

(And no, those wascally wepubwicans aren't at fault for my latest USPS package taking a leisurely loop-de-loop path through the country - if it ever even gets here, and doesn't join a back of the truck sale in Chicago. As with public schools, the problem isn't with any lack of dollars being thrown at it ... )

Comment Huh (Score 0) 197

So when government took its thumb off the scales, the scales shifted? Okay.

EV Policy Timeline & Tracker

Federal tax credits for clean vehicles expired, including 25E (Used Clean Vehicles), 30D (New Clean Vehicles), and 45W (Commercial Clean Vehicles, which was also used for leases). While these tax credits were initially authorized by Congress to run through 2032, the July 4, 2025, spending bill eliminated them as of September 30th. Vehicles with a signed contract and payment in place by September 30, 2025, are still eligible for these tax credits upon delivery.

Comment Re:who is protecting us? (Score 1) 72

I believe that the USA is facing its "Hitler" moment, where about 33% of White Nationalists are taking over everybody. They don't seem to care about what is in the United States Constitution, nor about the concept about forming a More Perfect Union. It is pure selfishness.

You definitely need to step away from the things that use data centers (social media, chatbots ...).

Comment Re:A lot of Americans... (Score 1) 52

Are regressing back to superstition and pseudo-science. Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Well, why not? It's mainstream now to dabble in sympathetic magic. "If I dress like and pretend to be that sort of person, then I am that sort of person! And everyone else HAS to agree!"

Honestly, cryptids seem rather mild by comparison.

Comment Re:2TB SSD (Score 1) 70

What in the actual fuck are those tabs doing eating gigabytes of RAM? And why in the fuck are most Chromium based browser installs now almost a gig of storage?

Never going to say that we can't optimize something better.

But let's get real - the engines have got insanely more capable. We can do things with just CSS now that it took reams of JS to do before, if you could even do them.

But -- we can do that because the browser engine is now capable of it.

Comment Re:Rethinking our approach (Score 2) 106

No, if you base it on IP address, then it's pointless to lock out attackers because they have more IP addresses than you can ever hope to lock out. And consider your authentication system design, potentially having to keep track of tens of millions of locked IP addresses per user account...

I have never encountered a system that took IP addresses or even networks into account when deciding whether or not to lock an account. If an organization is aware that someone is trying to crack your account and they do use lockouts, but don't lock it out globally, then IMO they are at risk of a lawsuit.

lol okay. I work with a bunch of website clients and multiple hosting companies. We use systems that lock out by individual IP address all the time. E.g. 5 failed login attempts from the same IP address; that address gets blocked (for X hours).

It's not pointless at all; it works well. It's not a panacea - nothing is - but it's a nice layer.

Comment Re:What I don't like about Dawkins (Score 1, Troll) 386

I find it interesting that so much transphobia seems to focus on a particular type of transgendered individual.

I find it interesting that a silly, middle-school level taunt word had to be invented to support a position that can't be supported otherwise.

There is no "phobia". People aren't "afraid" of something that's ridiculous and insane*. There's a reason that so much British comedy used to revolve around cross dressing, lol. Because it's absurd and laughable.

* With logical exceptions. One can be "afraid" of a rabid dog, or of the consequences of a boy in the girl's locker room. But that's a logical form of "fear", not a phobia.

Comment Re: What I don't like about Dawkins (Score 1) 386

Our current best understanding of consciousness is that it's an after-the-fact rationalisation of the multiple low-level brain processes that converge into a subconscious decision.

Rationalization?

Why would "multiple low-level brain processes" need to "rationalize" (whatever that would mean, if this theory were true)?

Who is rationalizing? Why? And for the benefit of who/what?

Comment lol (Score 0) 103

Nobody was against the feds spending the money.

It's already spent, so any "refunds" are going to come from the taxpayers. (Or from everybody, via "printing" money and the resultant inflation.)

But okay, Dems will cheerlead transferring money from taxpayers to CEO's. Sounds good ...

Comment Re:Rethinking our approach (Score 2) 106

And if you lock an account after a certain number of incorrect guesses... we're back to the DoS situation, where anyone who knows or can guess your login name (often your email address) can lock you out of your account.

No, because (in good setups) you lock out per IP address. The botnet machines locked themselves out, but they didn't lock me out.

Slashdot Top Deals

The reward of a thing well done is to have done it. -- Emerson

Working...