I think Temple OS would better suit you. Linux development is full of DEI and all that stuff you hate.

right comment this time

Sorry responded to the wrong comment

I think Temple OS would better suit you. Linux development is full of DEI and all that stuff you hate.

If they are going to threaten all of us with violence, how is it wrong for us to respond in kind?

A low power locked down laptop with amazing battery life and few attack vectors that includes cellular connectivity akin to an iPhone?

The perfect CEO laptop.

Wow, If you have no understanding of copyright you should refrain from commenting on it.

1. You cannot copyright "looking like Daryl Hannah" as there is no creative work on that. You could copyright a picture of her as the photographer but that does not bar other people from taking her picture.

2. Fictional characters do get copyrighted, do some research on "sufficient delineation" As this is one of the metrics to determining copyright protection.

The Sufficient Delineation Test
The second test, and the one most often used by courts when grappling with extending copyright protection to a character, is the sufficient delineation test. The sufficient delineation test asks whether a specific character is “especially distinctive,” that is, whether the character displays “consistent, widely identifiable traits.” Some courts have broken this test into three prongs: (1) whether the character has physical as well as conceptual properties; (2) whether the character is recognizable through those identifiable traits whenever it appears; and (3) whether the character contains elements of original expression. The heart of this test is an attempt to determine the exact point at which the scale tips and a character no longer is a stock character but becomes a sufficiently delineated character protected by copyright.

You paid an artist to make you a Superman image, guess what, the artist violated copyright in a way that is not supported by fair use, as did the AI.

And with Superman being a sufficiently delineated character, even an original drawing of him would be considered infringement, no actual copying necessary.

Not sure what point you are getting at here.

If you thought your argument was anything more than trolling you would have left your name attached,
Being able to name the judge in a case is not "name dropping", but it does show the person has taken the time to research the issue.

If someone else's creation is making your image for you, YOU are not creating anything, prompt or no prompt.

If I ask a blacksmith to make me a sword, did I make the sword?

And the tool is making derivative works commercially so you'd be hard pressed to make a fair use argument.

Are you saying I did not buy games on Game Pass? Weird I have several MS games on Games Pass that I payed for and are not part of the sub.

To answer your last question, it will be (however well it is optimized), it has been well reported that this will be a feature of Windows 11 not just the Xbox Ally devices.

$899

https://www.theshortcut.com/p/...

Cannot be worn or sold in California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington as they violate 2 party consent laws.

Heâ(TM)s not discovering anything, heâ(TM)s actively engineering it.

There is no dark side of the Moon, There's a far side, but it gets sun, especially during eclipses.