These companies that were hit should be bringing criminal charges against Anthropic. At the very least, they should be able to pressure Anthropic into providing an IP blacklist to ensure it never happens again.

The original iPhone was a glorified Blackberry. The original Android had an app store.

I was being a bit glib. The iPhone obviously stole from Sidekick before Android came around. Then they started stealing from Android.

Sure, but no one in the scientific community is crediting OpenAI with this discovery.

The History of the iPhone in a nutshell.

Find a competitive foldable automobile and see how much it costs compared to non-foldable automobiles, and I think you'll find foldable shit is expensive.

Yes, but record profit margins.

That's perfect for Apple. If their rabid fans buy this, they can say they revolutionized the phone by introducing foldable devices and their fans will believe Apple actually invented something.

In our criminal justice system, the actions of one individual aren't justification to retaliate against every other individual in the class. This concept applies to cops, just as well as women, minorites, or the disabled.

Juries are the final arbiters of whether a cop is trusted or not. Not the judges.

Knowledge can't be stolen. Only shared.

That dynamic would only impact those who want to patent or otherwise monetize their work. That is not a description of science. That's a description of R&D.

There has always been a dialog between science and industry. This doesn't change that in the least.

The word "accuse" is being used as if it's some sort of crime or unethical to engage in this behavior. It is not. This is the inevitable result of a retarded business model pushed by well-connected tech morons like Sam Altman.

The whole point of parallel construction is that you find alternative legal bases for bringing in evidence. The fact that the officers can't be trusted has little impact on the evidence being admissable and damning.

Well, if only women could be more trustworthy, we might get rape convictions, and then more crimes would be reported and investigated. But unfortunately, as we all know, women don't know when they've been raped. That's a man's job to decide.

"Is it just to narrow the number of people who can replace them?"

The complete opposite. The thinking is that if you use a popular framework you can easily find talent who knows how your system works.

The fact that this breaks down when you have a website backed by 372 micro-services written in 7 different languages and that simple tasks like checking a log now require specific knowledge of additional tools is orthogonal to the original idea of having a platform with a large labor pool of people who require minimal onboarding.

If a search for "playdate" comes up with objectionable shit, that says a lot about how your behavior has driven your search algorithm.