Here's a link to a site where birthing people are perhaps not pleased that many of them are now displaced by "assigned at birth" men have become women, therefore are woman because they say so, therefore must be allowed to play on women's teams. https://womenssportspolicy.org...
Interestingly that site has almost no evidence to support your claim of
little girls being run over by men on their sports teams.
Of the cases they listed, I counted 3 that were in contact sports. Two were in boxing, one was in hockey. The overwhelming majority were in sports that forbid contact - mostly cycling and track and field.
That doesn't mean that trans athletes won't have an advantage - especially if they are early in their transition - but your argument of "little girls being run over by men on their sports teams" simply isn't supported by any information that you have provided.
What biology is not, however, is binary. If you think otherwise then I suggest you go and study it. Gene expression is almost never an all-or-nothing matter. Gender is frequently on a continuum for many species. Transgender is not a new concept at all, it has existed in many cultures for hundreds if not thousands of years.
And here my friend, is the full text document. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-... Is it your premise that MAGA came and slipped the "birthing person" into the official document?
Did you read the document? The phrase "birthing person" was used exactly once in 74 pages. By comparison "women" was used 20 times. And if we look at where "birthing people" comes in, we find:
Reduces Maternal Mortality Rate and
Ends Race-Based Disparities in Maternal
Mortality. The united States has the highest
maternal mortality rate among developed na-
tions, with an unacceptably high mortality rate
for Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and
other women of color. To help end this high rate
of maternal mortality and race-based dispari-
ties in outcomes among birthing peopleâ"and in
addition to the investment in maternal health
included in the American Families Planâ"the
BuDgeT OF The u. S. gOVeRNMeNT FOR FISCAL YeAR 2022 19
Budget includes more than $200 million to: re-
duce maternal mortality and morbidity rates
nationwide; bolster Maternal Mortality Review
Committees; expand the Rural Maternity and
Obstetrics Management Strategies program;
help cities place early childhood development ex-
perts in pediatrician offices with a high percent-
age of Medicaid and Childrenâ(TM)s health Insurance
Program patients; implement implicit bias train-
ing for healthcare providers; and create State
pregnancy medical home programs
This is not being used as some sort of gender-substituting new-age term. It is literally referring to people who are having children. It is recognizing that we have an unacceptably high rate of death for both infants and mothers who are delivering children. It also uses the term "maternal mortality", which very much is a feminine term.
As well as the young male voters deciding they didn't want to vote for the party that takes their orders from people who demonstrably hate them because penis
That statement does more to support my argument of the narrative being controlled by the MAGA party than it does to support your argument. You reached that conclusion in spite of the actual facts, not because of them.
Until people with penises are disenfranchised, it is just possible you shouldn't continually demean them
It's interesting how the rules also differ across the aisle here. If someone is offended by the MAGA party they are told to suck it up. If someone is offended by the democrats they are welcomed to the MAGA party with open arms, regardless of whether or not their offense is grounded in reality. In other words, one party gets infinite second chances, while the other is out on the first strike even though no pitch was actually thrown.
Declare me wrong if you like, but I do pretty good research, and my conclusions are generally sound
I wish your links supported that claim.
