That's why most C devs migrated to C++. Remind us about Rusts object model... oh that's right , it doesnt have one. Like VB it has kinda sorta OO type stuff but theres actual OO there. And yes, it does matter. Procedural programming large code based becomes a chore real fast.

"The game is up" is a common turn of phrase you aspie idiot. Normal people know exactly what he means.

Thanks for the heads up, I never thought of searching for the info. Been there, done that, I still don't understand whats going on on a large scale inside these models.

... I know how my parents felt when I tried to explain programming too them. It all makes grammatical sense but the actual meaning eludes me.

Is it just me? Am I just getting old and heading for the get-off-my-lawn stage or are there any other people who like to think they're tech savvy but are totally confused by AI models and how they really work?

From what I can gather, superionic means the O2 is frozen in a lattice while the H2 moves around within in. Doesn't this just mean the water/ice has dissociated into solid oxygen with hydrogen diffused inside?

Doesn't seem that much to me at all given how much iron can expand and contract per degrees C as it heats and cools. 14 miles out of 3000 is 0.5% which is nothing.

CO2 being an infra red absorber and scatterer really isn't hard to understand for anyone with even a passing understanding of physics. ie not you.

"but weather changes are so significant that our prediction models dont work anymore"

AI weather models may use the past to predict the future but AFAIK conventional models simply use physics so climate change will be factored in by default by dint of registering higher temps at monitoring stations.

You couldn't model it accurately even in principle as quantum theory states you can't know the absolute position and speeds at the same time.

A good demonstration of how mathematics is the best humans have come up with to define the physical laws but reality ultimately may not be fully describable by it.

... has the full orchestra on it it seems. Reminds me of when every webdev was extolling the virtues of Ruby to whoever would listen. How often do you see any mention of it now?

Wtf is the point of Rust at the to-the-metal level when by definition most of what you do will be unsafe memory wise? Seems to me like some Rust shills have been evangelising to devs still at the age where they can't differentiate marketing BS from fact.

They wouldnt even need to go to the trouble of roadblocks, they could just ration fuel as has happened in many countries in times of strife.

Thats like saying nothing has changed with the chemical reaction of fossil fuels since the 1880s. Yes, but its completely missing the point. A lot has changed about reactor design and safety since the 80s never mind the 50s. Maybe get a clue before you post again. Oh wait, why would you break the habit of a lifetime?

This is a taxi service - the kidult would already be sitting in the back in a normal cab. The ONLY thing this achieves is
A) Putting taxi drivers out of work (seems to be a Musk fetish)
B) Making it harder to move the car if the systems fail because no steering wheel.

On a more practical front - if there's an emergency how TF are emergency teams supposed to move the car out of the way or get it on the back of a tow truck easily if they can't fecking well steer it and the computer is dead?

This is just yet more tech for its own sake. Musk needs to realise sci-fi is not a how-to manual, its entertainment.