Amazon Warns Sellers Not To Gouge Users on Face Masks as Prices Skyrocket on Coronavirus Fears (gizmodo.com) 86
Amazon is warning third-party sellers on its Marketplace platform not to gouge customers on protective face masks as the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak that originated in mainland China continues to spread internationally and becomes increasingly likely to hit the U.S. From a report: The effectiveness of the masks as a preventative measure against infection by the coronavirus, a novel virus called SARS-CoV-2 which causes a disease called COVID-19, is unclear. Proper handwashing and avoiding contact with infected individuals is probably more important, and the Centers for Disease Control isn't currently advising the general public wear masks. But prices for masks have tripled and in some cases quadrupled on Amazon, with Amazon telling some sellers that their listings are "not in compliance" with policies that ban price-gouging. Typically this policy is enforced during the holiday season when there are shortages of popular gifts, though price-gouging on Amazon during previous crises has been an issue (such as elevated prices for water before the impact of Hurricane Irma). Many states also have laws against raising prices of basic goods during emergencies, which the outbreak is after the feds declared a public health emergency last month.
I was in the hospital last week for an appointment (Score:2)
They had dispensers for face masks (free) all over the place.
I asked if they had any Coronavirus cases, they said "not even one".
Re: (Score:2)
For the censorious trolls:
That's a silly non-profit fake solution! Giving away face masks just to prevent people from getting sick. LOSERS!
The REAL problem with COVID-19 is that it will interfere with the Trumpenberg Rallies. Trump NEEDS his rallies so he can spread his special Trump Derangement Syndrome to his deranged mob! Also crucial for his mental state and keeping his spirits up, Up, UP! You think he can cancel his rallies just because there's an epidemic running around? Hell, no!
But the optics of red hats and face masks? That could look terrible.
Crisis meet opportunity: PROFIT!
Special color-coordinated face masks for Trumpists to wear at the rallies! Five bucks a pop! Twenty buck for a five-pack! CHEAP! Buy masks for your entire family. Sisters, cousins, spouses. Or is that just one mask? (Yeah, I couldn't resist the cheap shot.)
Wait! There's a real danger here! What if the evangelicals decide COVID-19 is gawd's wrath sent to halt the Trumpenberg Rallies? Gotta blame Xi first! It's all Xi's fault and a REAL Chinese plot with a bunch of dead Chinese as camouflage!
Re: (Score:2)
Originally this started as a joke, but now I can't tell if it's a censorship issue or an abuse of moderation thing. If Slashdot's newest "owners" have any delusions about "healing" the system, better moderation would be a good place to start.
Anyway, once again, here's the joke the trolls would hate for you to see:
That's a silly non-profit fake solution! Giving away face masks just to prevent people from getting sick. LOSERS!
The REAL problem with COVID-19 is that it will interfere with the Trumpenberg Rallies. Trump NEEDS his rallies so he can spread his special Trump Derangement Syndrome to his deranged mob! Also crucial for his mental state and keeping his spirits up, Up, UP! You think he can cancel his rallies just because there's an epidemic running around? Hell, no!
But the optics of red hats and face masks? That could look terrible.
Crisis meet opportunity: PROFIT!
Special color-coordinated face masks for Trumpists to wear at the rallies! Five bucks a pop! Twenty buck for a five-pack! CHEAP! Buy masks for your entire family. Sisters, cousins, spouses. Or is that just one mask? (Yeah, I couldn't resist the cheap shot.)
Wait! There's a real danger here! What if the evangelicals decide COVID-19 is gawd's wrath sent to halt the Trumpenberg Rallies? Gotta blame Xi first! It's all Xi's fault and a REAL Chinese plot with a bunch of dead Chinese as camouflage!
3M N-95 now at $90 per 20-pack (Score:2)
They're usually about $19.99 for a 20-pack at the big box stores:
https://www.lowes.com/pd/3M-Particulate-Respirator-8210Plus-N95-20-Box/1002442120 [lowes.com]
But then last night, they surged to $60 per 20-pack, and this morning, they're at $90 per 20-pack.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=8210+plus+3m+pack+20&_sacat=0&_sop=15 [ebay.com]
PRO-TIP: If you're in the trades, and you have to wear a particulate mask to earn a living, then start hoarding
READ THE DETAILS OF THE RESULTS (Score:2)
SECOND LINK: eBay returned a hit for a 2-pack, of which more than 20 2-packs are available, so a 20-pack would come in at a combined price of 10 x $19.99 = $199.90.
Fellows in the Trades - YIKES!!!!! (Score:1)
A bandana is a sorry substitute for a proper 3M 8210+ N95.
Re: (Score:2)
What about the facial recognition people, they got to looking on the corona virus fears and everyone wearing a facemask with true horror. So protect your health and protect your privacy, you now have an excuse, make wearing a facemask popular and everyone gets their public privacy back.
Masks should be to protect others, not the wearer (Score:3, Informative)
It's been pretty much proven that the majority of masks don't act as a preventative measure for those who DON'T have a virus, but rather, are a preventative measure for those who do, to stop the spread.
In other words, masks should be worn to protect other people from what YOU may have.
There are exceptions - but the more advanced masks are exceptionally uncomfortable, hard to put on correctly and also, need to be handled extremely carefully.
As always, trying to keep a distance from those showing visible signs of any sickness, washing your hands often and getting out of the habit of touching your face is pretty much the best prevention anyone can do.
The face touching habit is a hard one to break - just observe a room full of people and watch how often people touch their faces - eyes, nose, mouth - with their hands.
It is this which is the most prevalent method of disease spreading - touch a contaminated surface, touch your face.
Arguably a mask is pointless is you touch an infected surface and then rub your eye with your fingers after.
Re: (Score:2)
Quite true. Those paper masks would do little to protect yourself. But if you have an air born illness it would catch a good number of the viruses.
I work in healthcare we are required to get the flu shot unless of a medical reason where they are required to wear a mask. Not to stop the employee from catching the flu. But not to spread it to the patient if they do.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is why Asia has no coronavirus outbreaks! The perfect system.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They stopped the spread in Wuhan by complete lockdown. Now the Chinese govt is panicking about the economy and are talking about ending the movement restrictions for 760 million people and the quarantine of 150 million people, If/when they do this then of course the numbers of infected will explode again.
Currently it's taking 20,000 medical staff to look after what we're told is ~ 50,000 still infected, of which around 10% will be in intensive care. The staff are saying they are having difficulty coping wi
Re: (Score:2)
In other words, masks should be worn to protect other people from what YOU may have.
Sort of like how vaccines protect others, especially vulnerable populations. But, just as with vaccines, voluntary compliance of sick people wearing face masks--in the US at least--just doesn't happen.
Re: (Score:2)
You think you're giving sound advice but you're not. If only the sick wear masks, the sick identify themselves for harassment. Now you've created a situation where no one wants to wear a mask, sick or not.
Supply and Demand (Score:5, Insightful)
About the worst thing anyone can do, and I have no doubt someone will propose, is setting price caps, perhaps even below market prices in order to ensure that "everyone can have enough" which really just ensures no one will want to supply the item at all. Increased prices meanwhile even allow manufacturers who would not otherwise produce some item (because they could not do so profitably at market rates before the increase) to begin manufacturing it because it has now become profitable for them to do so.
Re: (Score:3)
I've lived in Nashville for 20 years now, and during that time we've had two gasoline shortages. Our gasoline comes from a dedicated pipeline from New Orleans. In each case, people have went nuts about "price gouging" and forcing gas stations to not overcharge for gasoline.
The easily predicted effect is that everybody fills their cars up whether they need it or not, meaning that people who really *do* need it can't get it. I'd rather an ambulance have to pay $20/gallon and have gasoline available than to
Re: (Score:2)
There ought to be two lines, one where they charge the normal price but you can only buy maybe 2 gallons and then you have to get back in line if you want more, and one line where they charge a higher price but you can buy as much as you want. This prevents hoarding and the gas station can't be accused of price gouging because they also sold it at the normal price.
Those Amazon sellers who wish to engage in what Econ 101 dropouts call "price gouging" should simply go to eBay and sell everything at auction (n
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
High prices don't prevent people from buying things they don't need. They prevent *people of limited means* from buying things they don't need.
The one thing that you can say is that they incentivize vendors to increase the quantity supplied to the market. When the price per mask hits $4.50 you get on to the phone to your Chinese supplier...
Oh, wait.
Re: (Score:2)
They prevent *people of limited means* from buying things they don't need.
No they don't, because if you really NEED something even people of limited means can get it, if it's just more expensive.
Artificially low prices means that people of limited means cannot buy the thing at ANY PRICE, because people with greater means scooped up all available stock early because it was nothing to them to buy 100 of something they might need two of.
Re: (Score:2)
One would begin doubt you ever knew anyone who struggled to meet the rent bill or put food on the table.
In time, over a sustained crisis industry would inevitably churn out more masks. But even modern capitalism would be hard pressed to come up with, and distribute, tens of millions of N95 masks in a matter of months. In the meantime, people with lots of money and not much sense can be counted on to *naturally* drive up the price of the masks, even if "natural" here refers to human's natural state of ign
Re: (Score:2)
At some point, the only way a person of limited means can get the thing they need is at gunpoint. The only thing gouging changes is who they have to point the gun at.
THE WALKING DEAD (Score:2)
We no longer have a TalmudVision in our humble abode, but back when we had a TalmudVision & a Cable-TalumdVision contract on our lives, that seemed to be the fundamental working hypothesis of the entire Walking Dead franchise: Nice guys always finish last, and survivors take what they need [even if that means murdering the nice guys in the process].
PS: This is also of course why our elites don't want "pe
Re: (Score:1)
Amazon could easily limit orders to one per account.
That would be better since it would stop people with capital buying large numbers and selling them on eBay for even more.
Re: (Score:1)
If the gov of some nation wants to bulk buy and send out "one per" citizens then can.
Until then people can buy what they want with their own money.
Re: (Score:2)
Not Supply and Demand (Score:2)
"Meanwhile rising prices are a signal to manufacturers that there's money to be made by ramping up their own production"
However, there are cases where an increase in price in response to an economic shock won't lead to a meaningful increase in supply. The name for these cases is... price gouging. It is an actual economic concept.
Pretending that all markets are in equilibrium doesn't make you insightful.
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, in many places, jacking up the price like that is a crime.
If the price doesn't get jacked up, manufacturers will still happily crank out more because they like sales and the orders are rolling in. If they're smart, they're not going to build new facilities no matter how high the price goes since by the time they might go into service, prices and demand will be back to what they were before and ROI will go out the window..
Note that there is a difference between a reasonable rise in price
Re: (Score:2)
You can't have new manufacturers entering market that fast, as new products need to be certified and tested.
Oh seriously stop with the face masks (Score:3, Informative)
Face masks won't work as protection for you.
They only work as protection for others IF YOU ARE ALREADY INFECTED, but you shouldn't be in public anyway.
Stop it with the face masks. Just wash your hands with bar soap and water - not anti-biotic as it's a virus so anti-biotic soaps just breed superbugs and don't help.
If you get a temperature or symptoms, stop going into public areas. Contact your local health authorities.
Re: Oh seriously stop with the face masks (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
You're not the first person to make this mistake. We had a whole argument about it in the last Covid discussion. For a virus, airborne means that the virus is attached to a dust particle or is in an evaporated fluid droplet. The size of the virus is irrelevant. What matters is whether it can live in a fluid droplet or on a dust particle that the mask can't filter.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Oh seriously stop with the face masks (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Two week infection period says hi.
Re: (Score:2)
Except then 95 in N95 is the percentage that it stops. I wouldn't want to get on the tube with one of these masks if there was a big outbreak in the city. Masks haven't stopped 3200+ Chinese medical workers out of 20,000 from catching the virus.
They work to a degree altering the probability of you catching the virus but I wouldn't want to stake my life on it working.
PAPRs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
An increase in demand makes things cheaper on your planet?
Re: (Score:3)
Standard masks designed for the sick, not healthy. (Score:3, Insightful)
The standard mask is designed to catch the spittle and exhaled viruses from a sick person. They are NOT air tight and exposure to air breathed by a sick person not wearing a mask will infect you if all you are wearing is a standard mask.
If you want to protect yourself from sick people, rather than protect healthy people from you, you need a:
fit-tested respirator
The fit testing ensures it is air tight and you won't breathe in viruses:
https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/sa... [3m.com]
Re: (Score:2)
And you also need to not have facial hair under the edge of the mask. If you do have such hair, then you need a constant flow (positive pressure) air supply hood.
Re: (Score:3)
More importantly, they aren't designed to protect against gouging. So the sellers might as well just go for the eyes.
Re: (Score:1)
A simple mask will prevent the majority of airborne virus from getting to your face and the main orifices on it. That decreases the chance you will be infected.
Ha ha. Too late. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is insane (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Sort of blame the victim and I apologize for this already - but why doesn't your friend just have a ton of those masks already ?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
She should be wearing a silicone respirator with P100 cartridges anyway. The paper masks are of questionable effectiveness. Yes even the N95 and N99 ones. Paper does not form a very good seal with the skin on your face.
Amazon should do the same! (Score:2)
Good price.
Then I log into my Amazon account and the price is now $19.97.
Not so good a prince (IMHO).
Amazon price-gouges as a Business Practice!
Why is Bezos getting his panties in a wad?
Re: (Score:3)
Huh? (Score:2)
ER price is like X1000 amazon price any ways! (Score:2)
ER price is like X1000 amazon price any ways!
Published research on face masks (Score:2)
Here is a published paper comparing surgical masks vs. respirators for virus protection [sciencedaily.com].
Short version: no difference between surgical masks and N95 type respirators.
Another article on the CDC not recommending people wear masks in public areas [mayoclinic.org].
Washing your hand and avoiding contact with other infected people are still the best ways to prevent you being infected.
Re: (Score:2)
Respirators is not really the correct term. The study compaired surgical masks with N95 masks and found them both ineffective at preventing respiratory infections in a hospital environment. No one knows why.
For now the best bet at not breathing in Wuhan is to wear a silicone respirator with P100 filters or if you can afford it a PAPR positive pressure hood with a belt mounted fan driven HEPA/P100 filter.
As far as washing your hands and not touching your face isn't that obvious? I mean duh.
a very secondary product (Score:2)
someone please warn amazon about undersupplying (Score:2)
Amazon is just virtue signaling and doesn't care about anyone.