It's laughable that you think this administration's DOJ is interesting in doing anything about Flock, and absolutely absurd you think it would take "just a few complaints" for them to take any action at all.

This ship has sailed mate. DOJ is at the fucking helm.

It matters either way. The names divorced from the faces certainly is a smaller attack vector, but the absurd lack of data security is the story here, not the threat analysis.

The fact that this type of event is more or less normalized is the real problem.

The yacht's owner cannot relieve the master's responsibility to assist a vessel in distress. If the yacht owner is ashore and a hired captain/master is commanding the yacht, the statutory obligation belongs to the master/person actually in charge. An owner calling the captain and saying, for example, "Don't divert; I'm not paying for the fuel/time" would not erase the master's statutory duty. The master has to make the decision based on the circumstances at sea, including whether rendering assistance would seriously endanger his own vessel or those aboard. (46 U.S.C. 2304)

Of course the entire point is that it is being stored. All of it., "flagged" or not. Imagine being an apologist for this shit.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/thanks-flock-cameras-drove-across-145634632.html

Frost Piss!!!

Good lord, you're insufferable.

Gonna be the only way very soon, aside from legacy versions of course. macOS 27 ends support for Intel (and Hackintosh along with it).

Nice cleaned up and polished "bOtH sIDeS!!!" argument you've got there. Absurd.

Is the CDC an authoritative source at this point given the administration under which it operates?

As does slashdot editors', apparently.

Just shut the fuck up already.

You misspelled "collect".

Anyone reading this site along with 70% of the mobile device using population knows what "dynamic island" is. Stop feigning ignorance.

TikTok = 17
Facebook = 2
Instagram = 2
X = 1
Twitter = 0

The modern "640k" quip...