Comment Re:But why? (Score 1) 197
Is anyone else puzzled about the logic behind hitting him now? Sure, there's some amount of supremacy nerd 'noone is beyond our reach' wank value to targeting someone through the CCTV system; but why hand a fairly unpopular theocrat who is already old enough that succession planning is an urgent problem basically the most PR-friendly death imaginable at the same time as you provide his government with a plausible argument along the usual 'need to take necessary measures during the current crisis' lines?
That's a more or less instant upgrade from 'increasingly pathetic reactionary with questionable public support' to 'martyred by jews and international zionism' for a guy who was otherwise not long on options for shoring up his popularity.
Because Israel said so. That's all you need to know. Now Israel can play victim when someone does something to them, completely ignoring they're the one who's been attacking its neighbors for decades.
In addition to that, there is probably the Venezuela scenario.
When you have incompetent people heading critical departments, such as Hegseth and Gabbard, they see "decapitating the regime" causing it to fall in-line with the USA. You capture/kill the head of the regime, and the rest of the country will magically bend to the will of the USA.
You even see Hegseth saying this is not Iraq, this is not eternal war.
Wishful thinking all the way, caused by hubris and incompetence.