Of Ellen Pao's dropped appeal, I am:
Displaying poll results.16033 total votes.
Most Votes
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 8478 votes
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 7252 votes
Most Comments
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 68 comments
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 20 comments
She lost her appeal, after all. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
>See, there is a lot of reverse racism regarding Asians.
What the fuck is reverse racism and how does it differ from regular racism?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
"Being favourable to someone because of their race (instead of merit)."
No! SJWs call that 'fetishization', as in "I think Asian women are hot".
Reverse racism is discriminating against some minority you believe to have 'privilege' (another one of their sacred terms) because their culture emphasizes learning, science and the arts noticeably more than yours does,
Re: (Score:2)
I just don't think that Asian women are cute, they are cute! Kawaii! ^_^
Re: (Score:1)
Literally no one hires employees like this. What exactly did you base this comment on? It certainly wasn't documented experience.
"Oh geez, you're a chinaman, welcome aboard!"
Re: (Score:3)
of course not. outsourcing to india is all about the $$$. You think if outsourcing to india were the same cost as doing it in house, the CEO would say "fuck it lets do it anyway cuz those indians are smart peeps."
Re: (Score:1)
Out of curiosity, how many Chinamen live in India?
Re: (Score:1)
What the fuck are you talking about? The chinaman is not the issue here, Dude. I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you DO NOT... Also, Dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.
Re: (Score:1)
But nowhere near equally.
Our standards of attractiveness are largely shaped by the media. Or at least, they're popularized by the media, and the media is typically much more constrained than the population they reach. American media is largely shaped by affluent men in Hollywood and New York. And these men have deemed that women are attractive from about twelve to their late twenties, while men are attractive from about twenty to the start of baldness.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Meh. Women who are considered "super duper hot" need to be born with physiology that allows it or surgery.
Men who are considered "super duper hot" have to work out 4 hours a day and take enough protein supplements to destroy their internal organs.
Either way its fucked up.
Re: (Score:2)
Proteins don't kill your inner organs. ...
To stay sexy and fit 90Mins 4 times a week is enough. Likely less
But perhaps you have a retarded idea when a man (or girl) is 'looking hot'?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Too much proteines is pretty rough on your kidneys. That's why people going on protein diets (probably one of the easiest way to lose weight) have to be closely followed by doctors, and why body builders often learn the hard way they actually need kidneys.
And the whole point of my post was talking about the "ridiculous standard that are blasted to us by the medias and societies". For both men and women, getting there is absurd. Getting to a "reasonable and healthy" level isn't that bad for either men or wo
Re: (Score:2)
Too much proteines is pretty rough on your kidneys.
That is nonsense.
Re: (Score:1)
Sure, there are some fitness buffs and trainers out there that don't use steroids, but they don't stand a chance in the world of competitive bodybuilding (and they know it). Nowadays, you need an insane mix of good genes, steroid co
Re: (Score:2)
you know what straightener is?
the african american community would have a lot to say about how our perceptions are shaped by the media.
"black is beautiful" is a thing
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing I think women are like fine wines.
That's something that Hannibal Lecter copycats would say, comrade.
Re: (Score:2)
[losing one's appeal] is something that happens to everybody while aging...
That's something a pedophile might say.
Aha! So that's how we detect them!
Good thing I think women are like fine wines.
some age like milk.
Unsure: I don't know enough to opine (Score:5, Insightful)
Can a brother get a "I'm happy to admit that I don't know enough to feel that an opinion -- even of mixed mind -- is warranted because I don't know the details of the case, the relevant law, or have any other legitimate related expertise." ?
Re: (Score:3)
Opinions, by definition, need not be backed up by extensive knowledge or expertise.
Re: (Score:2)
Opinions, by definition, need not be backed up by extensive knowledge or expertise.
Indeed.
The sad thing is that they are often backed up by no knowledge, and even less expertise.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that's the other extreme.
Re: (Score:2)
"Professional opinion"?
Re: (Score:2)
Like, who's Ellen Pao and why was this on Slashdot?
Trial by public mob (Score:2)
Can a brother get a "I'm happy to admit that I don't know enough to feel that an opinion -- even of mixed mind -- is warranted because I don't know the details of the case, the relevant law, or have any other legitimate related expertise." ?
Not in the media. Media trials are always inaccurate, in that they cause large masses of people to form uninformed opinions with little regard for what evidence the jury reviews.
Re: (Score:2)
But you are constantly told it is your duty to vote. I believe it is your duty to make an informed vote, if you can't be bothered being informed you shouldn't vote.
Re:Once again, (Score:4, Informative)
>> Why is this /. worthy news?
Friday is SJW day here now.
Re: (Score:2)
wait... this shit is supposed to be limited to fridays?!?
Re: (Score:3)
It's supposed to be limited to Fridays. Friday 13th. That happen on a full moon. In leap years.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Fuck you. I'm an oppressed, upper middle-class, white male.
Re: (Score:2)
I think most of the people using the term SJW have no clue what it should mean, but feel that it sounds like an insult against liberals.
Personally, I'd never mind being called an SJW. I mean, they're calling me a Warrior, no matter what the rest of the letters mean. And then Justice Warrior? Are you calling me a super hero member of the Justice League? Was that supposed to be a *bad* thing? And then they add "Social". Yeah, that's really bad *snickers*. Does that mean my opponents are anti-social criminal w
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Found the legbeard.
Re: (Score:2)
Did you try clearing the cookies? That works for me.
For the 48% of us who voted like I did... (Score:2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
These days all you really know is that she was the "interim CEO" of reddit and helped lead the charge to censor the site in the name of "social justice."
What she's up to now that she basically got fired for ruining reddit is anyone's guess, but basically she's another one of those "women leaders" who's known more for being a woman than for being successful at anything she's tried. There's a reason she was fired from both her original firm (what this poll is ultimately about) and reddit, and it's not because
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
She did close down a couple for harassment (fatpeoplehate, rapingwomen, etc). Her successor closed a couple down for disagreeing with the hivemind.
Pao's vision for reddit censorship was to ban subs that promote behaviors negative to the community (doxing, "brigading"). Steve's vision for reddit censorship is to ban subs that spread ideas which would elicit awkward discomfort at your average San Francisco dinner party.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
FTFY. My personal belief is that I sincerely believe that Ellen sincerely believed in making reddit "better" (mostly by chopping off the ugliest bits and letting it bleed). Steve only believes in getting money out of Reddit.
Re: (Score:2)
Pao's vision for reddit censorship was to ban subs that promote behaviors negative to the community (doxing, "brigading").
I guess that's why SRS, SRD and Circlebroke are still around then. Pao's vision for reddit censorship was to ban subs that made a lot of noise and didn't do much, otherwise the subs I mentioned which actually dox, harass, and brigade other subs would be gone and their uses banned. Of course there's a reason why none of those 3 subs are banned, admins and Pao are either subs, or mods in one or all three once they retire.
Re: (Score:1)
So she's like Carly Fiorina, but only messed up some web BBS as opposed to a once-proud tech company?
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't say she got fired for ruining reddit -- odds are she was hired and ordered to ruin reddit, then fired to show that the leadership sympathizes with the redditors. If there had been real concern over her decisions, those decisions would have been reversed.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah. I wish I could change my vote to "What the fuck is this poll doing on /.?"
I don't see my answer (Score:2)
Apathetic - I really don't give a shit.
Re: (Score:2)
No, but my regularity is much higher up on my priority list than this shit here.
Missing option that probably would win (Score:5, Insightful)
Indifferent: I couldn't care less.
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently not true, your cared enough to enter the thread and comment, so indifferent, not at all. The thread did what it normally does for me, fired up some interest and curiosity enough to track down a bit of info and reinforced the idea that /.ers do not like venture or is that vulture capitalists or their employees. From my understanding of those types of firms, if you make them money you can do what ever they hell you want to do as long as you do not cause problems for the company when you do it, tot
Re: (Score:2)
To be honest, I came to this thread thinking that it was something relevant. You know, a lawsuit about copyright. Or one about our eroding liberties. Something that actually would matter to at least a majority of readers here.
Re: (Score:1)
I think you meant you "could care less", implying that the effort to care less would be too much so you wont bother.
Is there such a thing as absolute zero caring, yet still posting about it?
Re: (Score:2)
no, the phrase really is "couldn't care less". it means "i care so little that it's impossible for me to care any less".
"could care less" is a malapropism or a mondegreen, found almost exclusively in america. probably because of sloppy pronunciation of "couldn't".
http://dictionary.reference.co... [reference.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Well then my question stands all the stronger and the parent was obviously lying or at best exaggerating their claim.
Re: (Score:3)
Don't you mean "I could care less?" :D
http://xkcd.com/1576/ [xkcd.com]
Re: (Score:2)
This comment is the Frankenstein's monster of ill informed cliches.
Re: (Score:2)
Badly run, unprofitable businesses are bad for society, too, for customers, for employees, and for investors. Corporate cultures choosing people for management based on their genitals is an example. Businesses are not meant to be used to push political agendas.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that was some pretty bad judgment right there. Just being a member of an organization shouldn't absolve individuals of responsibility.
Re: (Score:2)
Overreaching "social justice" laws are bad for society. Know why I would no hire women right now? Only, and I mean ONLY, because of this bullshit going on. Should I ever have to fire her for whatever reason, I can as well prepare to set aside a budget for legal hassle with her trying to play the gender card of discrimination, and I get to prove why I kept that guy and not her.
Tell me why I shouldn't dodge that potential land mine by simple not hiring her in the first place?
Dumb poll (Score:2)
Since 99.999% of Slashdot readers probably don't know the details of the case, how can they have any sort of informed opinion? I think the only people who can have any sort of opinion are those who were present in the court for the original court case.
Re: (Score:2)
Way to go with false analogies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyone can voice an opinion. I was talking about informed opinion.
Re: (Score:2)
Why should people bother to make an informed decision on an online poll when they can't even be assed to make one in an election that actually has some effect on their lives?
Re: (Score:2)
right on man
Ellen Pao unfriend's club (Score:2, Interesting)
Annoyed (Score:5, Funny)
You forgot: "Who cares" (Score:3)
There are plenty ambivalent people that know what happened.
Re: (Score:2)
http://press.princeton.edu/tit... [princeton.edu]
Disappointed (Score:4, Insightful)
I admittedly haven't been on Slashdot much recently, but I'm really disappointed to see such a prevalence of people using the term "SJW". If you have an argument to make, please don't resort to epithets. Make your point and leave the name-calling to the playground.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, please remember. They're "people of social justice".
Re: (Score:3)
Time to burn some karma.
SJW is not a term that is adopted by people who tend to do actual social good through campaigning and proactive behaviour. SJW (particularly on social networks) is a self-applied term that armchair experts use to make themselves appear to be "good" people, i.e., those who sign an ill-devised online petition once in a while or fervently use a hashtag to "raise awareness". Thankfully, for the most part, their reach is limited to a relatively small group of people who already agree with
Re: Disappointed (Score:2)
I have literally never seen someone call themselves an sjw. I have almost exclusively seen it used by people annoyed with liberal / progressive ideas, particularly feminism, as a means of dismissing and belittling the speaker / writer. Its application has been regardless of the actual merits of whatever the person said, instead being usually a defensive tactic against a perceived attack (usually of someone's or a group's privilege).
Re: (Score:1)
Mod parent up.
It's amazing. The first time I heard the term Social Justice Warrior, it was on a thread issuing personal attacks on Anita Sarkeesian. Then I saw it applied to Zoe Quinn. Then I saw it applied to anyone who defended their viewpoints. It was always used derogatorily. That's the only way I've ever come across it.
It's just amazing to me that people who wish to insult others could choose so complimentary a term and turn it into an insult. How many people, who believe in equality for everybody, wou
How about "know who she is, but don't care."? (Score:2)
Really, I don't care. I know who she is, I know the gist of the lawsuit, I just don't care.
Other Coin (Score:2)
I have a long history here of shouting down the anti-feminists on this forum, especially those that summarily discount complaints of discrimination as being whiny. However in this case, that bitch is crazy. One of the few things I hate worse than a chauvinist is a narcissistic sociopath, of any gender.
Re: (Score:2)
shouting down the anti-feminists on this forum
One of the few things I hate worse than a chauvinist is a narcissistic sociopath, of any gender.
Defending feminism, or hating narcissistic sociopaths. Pick one. You can't have both in a world where Julie "put men in camps" Bindel, Amy "I raped a guy and it was hilarious" Schumer, Lena "I'm a pedophile" Dunham, Lindy "Hating men is totally cool" West, and so many more are prominent feminist writers and authors with no meaningful opposition.
What a freaking spoiled brat cry baby (Score:1)
Insane