No, they didn't. He literally just said that more people should be involved in editing wikipedia. His fellow cofounder also called out the pernicious lie that he was "canvassing".

And, frankly, the entire "canvassing" argument falls flat considering wikipedia itself is essentially owned by a handful of professional organized activists.

You know how I know you don't actually believe what you're saying?

You know how I know you don't actually believe what you're saying?

Has anyone even tried?

You bought a product. That product was damaged and functionality stolen from you. We have laws against this.

Oh look, a leftist lying like they breath once again.

Another solution to this is to fix IP law. Require all patents be for an actual tangible new invention, declare IP rights only for actual human beings, and limit copyright to 17 years. Enforce actual property laws for software like we did for cars.

Democracy and the EU don't belong in the same sentence. It's one of the least democratic entities in the developed world.

Look up the teaching materials leaked by whistleblowers. They treat basic literacy and things like believing in the existence of right and wrong answers to a math problem as "white supremacy". None of this is an accident. What is happening is exactly the intended result of the policies chosen by schools and teachers' unions.

Nail polish is even easier and more effective. And as a bonus you can do thinner layers for when you want some visibility still.

The CIA has been doing nothing but making everything it touches turn to shit since the cold war. Just wipe the slate clean and start over.

One of the most toxic aspects of the broader linux community is a refusal to ever actually provide proper documentation or even fixes for tons of things and instead simply demanding people search through decades of obscure forum threads and mailing lists. This could force ubuntu to actually get its shit together.

Meanwhile in reality per-pupil spending in the US is some of the highest in the entire world and it's far left policies like abolishing phonics and claiming expecting the right answer in math is "white supremacy" that lead to this, because a neurotic and ignorant population is easier to radicalize.

You're ignoring evidence of outright wrongdoing and egregious ethical violations and pretending it's mere "political leanings". You think you're a centrist but you're not, if the BBC's own internal ethics review isn't enough for you that's ipso facto proof of just how far left you are, all without realizing it. Your ideas of what "left" and "right" are have been skewed that badly.

Your post is a perfect example of circular reasoning. No matter what evidence you're given, no matter what argument is made, you can always circle back to where you started. You've got a way to dismiss and handwave everything away, usually by personally attacking the messenger rather than engaging with the evidence.

And your post is clear projection.You're treating logical fallacies like this is harry potter and all you have to do is recite a magical incantation to vanish away all the evidence that you're wrong about the quality of the BBC.