Comment Re:Two things both true (Score 1) 207
Ok, you doubled down... but you didn't actually say anything.
Lie. I've made an explicit point ever since my first post which you've refused to even engage with in bad faith.
Why are you saying it is a "lie" that Sanger was violating the canvassing rule? Everybody agrees he was, and he doesn't deny it. He simply makes procedural arguments for why he shouldn't be called out for it.
Double down. Saying "More people should become wikipedia editors" is not canvassing. It doesn't matter if a bigoted lynch mob lies and says it is, it isn't. Truth is not a popularity contest. "Canvassing" in wikipedia terms would be Sanger explicitly soliciting people to join the website and vote in a specific way. This is why even his fellow co-founder jimbo wales explicitly called out this vote as utter horseshit.
I've made this point consistently from the start, you keep lying about what happened, lying about what I said, and doubling down on your lies every reply.
You're a typical right-winger. The only time you shout "lie" is when you're telling them.
Projection.