Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Two things both true (Score 1) 207

Ok, you doubled down... but you didn't actually say anything.

Lie. I've made an explicit point ever since my first post which you've refused to even engage with in bad faith.

Why are you saying it is a "lie" that Sanger was violating the canvassing rule? Everybody agrees he was, and he doesn't deny it. He simply makes procedural arguments for why he shouldn't be called out for it.

Double down. Saying "More people should become wikipedia editors" is not canvassing. It doesn't matter if a bigoted lynch mob lies and says it is, it isn't. Truth is not a popularity contest. "Canvassing" in wikipedia terms would be Sanger explicitly soliciting people to join the website and vote in a specific way. This is why even his fellow co-founder jimbo wales explicitly called out this vote as utter horseshit.

I've made this point consistently from the start, you keep lying about what happened, lying about what I said, and doubling down on your lies every reply.

You're a typical right-winger. The only time you shout "lie" is when you're telling them.

Projection.

Comment Re:Two things both true (Score 1) 207

He doesn't even deny it, he just makes procedural arguments why he shouldn't be punished for it.

Lie

And you're either not smart enough to understand the words, or you're too much of a dingus to stick to actual arguments instead of yelling, "Squirrel!"

Double down

(The canvassing rule doesn't say that people involved in activism can't be editors. It says that people who are editors can't use activism to gain support for their edits.)

Project. In the exact way you claimed Sanger was doing in your initial lie.Literally all Sanger did was encourage more people to become wikipedia editors in general. Even Wales called out the pernicious lie that Sanger was "canvassing".

Comment Re:Two things both true (Score 0) 207

No, they didn't. He literally just said that more people should be involved in editing wikipedia. His fellow cofounder also called out the pernicious lie that he was "canvassing".

And, frankly, the entire "canvassing" argument falls flat considering wikipedia itself is essentially owned by a handful of professional organized activists.

Comment Re:"Sold a Story" (Score 0) 264

Look up the teaching materials leaked by whistleblowers. They treat basic literacy and things like believing in the existence of right and wrong answers to a math problem as "white supremacy". None of this is an accident. What is happening is exactly the intended result of the policies chosen by schools and teachers' unions.

Comment This might actually be a good thing (Score 1) 27

One of the most toxic aspects of the broader linux community is a refusal to ever actually provide proper documentation or even fixes for tons of things and instead simply demanding people search through decades of obscure forum threads and mailing lists. This could force ubuntu to actually get its shit together.

Slashdot Top Deals

The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the other 90% of the time.

Working...