Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:Responsible? (Score 5, Insightful) 528

we're also not the ones who mixed her personal and professional lives. she is.

she's the public face of the state department, which has policies in place to make sure that their correspondence are both secure and archived... so people can go back and look into them to make sure everything is aboveboard.

she sacrificed her right to privacy on her private correspondence when she conducted professional business on the same server.

i don't want to see her fucking wedding photos, but i want someone to make sure that she wasn't selling access to the office of the secretary of state of the united states. and if someone with clearance in the justice department needs to comb through 4 years of "private" emails to make sure, then she has only herself to blame.

Comment Re:It's A Bargain (Score 1) 460

we've established what you are, now we're just haggling over how much.

that story about that gent that asked a lady if she'd sleep with him for a million dollars, after she agreed she would he asked if she'd do it for 5. she was outraged at the low price and refused asking, 'what kind of woman do you take me for?'

the response was they'd already established what kind of woman she was with the first question, now they were just negotiating the price.

cheating a friend, and killing a man, once you know they're willing to do it, it's just matter of what circumstances would make them cross that line with you.

Comment Re:Sign the petittion... (Score 1) 801

well, people are fallible.

and yams are nutritious.

i'm not that worried about it, the president is not a king. the wild excesses of ron paul, bernie sanders or even donald trump would be pretty tamped down by congress.

unless we vote in a supermajority in senate... in which case there might be a problem.

Comment Re:Sign the petittion... (Score 1) 801

just read through the press-release by the fbi director.

he's saying he's not recommending charges be brought, and my reading of that is because they are not sure what charges might apply, because it was deemed unintentional and not willfully malicious.

and that people had hacked people she was talking to, but they hadn't seen evidence of them hacking her, but that she did access her email from countries that would be capable of it etc... unless the russia or the chinese weren't doing their jobs, they have more of her emails than we do essentially.

on the other point. yes, i've heard about the boy that cried wolf. and yes i question their motives, but the benghazi thing was more partisan and more about obama i think. initially at least.

also, the broken clock is right twice a day... disregarding an argument because of the source is the height of laziness.

and that story ends with the boy getting eaten... by a wolf.

Comment Re:Sign the petittion... (Score 1) 801

from what i gather, people are saying she redirected all state department correspondence through her private email server. effectively. she instructed her subordinates to redact parts of classified documents and send them to her unsecured server... the parts of the classified documents that said they were classified.

I also question the motives of the people saying she should not be indicted. the DOJ of a friendly administration and an FBI director that doesn't necessarily want to rock the boat before a presidential election.

that's also a concern, but part of me feels that if she'd be indicted if she weren't the presumptive democratic nominee for the presidential election, she should be indicted if she is.

caesars wife must be above suspicion.

Slashdot Top Deals

You are in the hall of the mountain king.

Working...