I clarified one ridiculous strawman, I didn't ask for you to spam us with even more of them.
No, actually you didn't. You refuted nothing, countered nothing, and believe that my response was a quick and easy attack. If anything, your original comment was a strawman, since you took things that were contextually inaccurate, factually inaccurate, wrapped it into a nice bundle and made it into a statement as a means of attack without refuting the actual substance of the original.
You really seem like the type of person who just needs to calm down, take a deep breath, and look at how crazy you're acting.
Pointing out that there's a group of people that are directly impacting basic freedoms is crazy. Gotcha, that makes plenty of sense. You wanna go hit up the University of Toronto and soap-box that there are two genders for example? Remember we have free medical care here in Canada, with luck you won't be violently assaulted.
Obviously, some left-wing person has annoyed you at some point, or maybe several such persons. But you're conflating the actions of a very small group of people, to include everyone you disagree with.
Well I can agree largely with your last sentence, it's a very small group of people. So how is it that this very small group of people are having such a negative effect on society and culture at large? Or are you saying that said effects aren't negative or are you saying that their actions aren't having an effect on society. Such as their attacks on expression, speech, public and private opinion. That universities for example now aren't shying away from subjects that could "upset students" or outright ban people who have opinions to the contrary because of "security concerns." Or do those count as just minor inconveniences because they haven't effected you yet?