I didn't call you unethical. I called the Generative AI industry unethical. And I never called you greedy. It's the AI oligarchs who are greedy.

There are (as you point out) many unethical industries and sometimes it's impractical not to use some of them, or perhaps we don't think they're all that unethical. I appreciate that your line is different from mine.

My links are admittedly a little old, but just today there was another story published on Slashdot saying that AI doesn't really make organizations any more productive. So I think the jury's still out on the productivity question.

I do like the craftsmanship of hand-written software. And being retired, I'm in no hurry, so a faster build/review/test cycle doesn't matter to me.

I would use the power tools except that I think the entire GenAI industry is unethical, so for that reason, I don't use the power tools.

I'm retired from software development, so I only work on hobby projects. I don't use AI by choice because it's a hobby and I enjoy all facets of software development. Getting an AI to do it would be completely contrary to my enjoyment of the hobby.

I have a friend still working in the field, though, and he says he hasn't hand-written code in over 6 months. He tells me the current models are really good and produce code, test-cases and documentation that's good enough for his company.

My friend has decades of software development experience. I agree with the concerns of others who wonder how new developers will ever learn the ropes if AI does everything.

OK. Then I think Trump should be charged with conspiracy to commit hostile acts against the USA.

It's a little different when only one side has the nukes.

All of the diesel Trump purportedly wants to buy from Russia over the next 3 months amounts to less than one day's worth of world consumption. It won't make a rat's ass of difference to "expenses to US people."

You are either conned by the grifter, or conning on behalf of the grifter.

Cramer vs. The United States (1945) resulted in a ruling from SCOTUS that an "enemy" must be an actual recognized foreign power actively engaged in war with the USA.

I read the text of the ruling and could find nothing saying anything like that. Can you provide a quote from the actual ruling to support your contention?

That is not true. Treason includes assisting enemies of the USA who are in "open conflict" with the USA. There's nothing in the Constitution saying that there needs to be an officially-declared war.

This is the text of 18 U.S. Code Sec 2381:

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

I'm aware that treason charges are rare and convictions even rarer, but still. Trump has given the enemies of the United States "aid and comfort".

That would be far easier if the Russian asset in the White House would stop sucking Putin's dick

What the Russian asset is doing amounts to treason. Russia helped Iran to target and kill American troops, and the White House Russian asset rewards Russia by lifting sanctions and purporting to buy diesel from Russia.

There are few options for low-damage area denial. Which ARE acceptable and why?

I think water cannons can be pretty effective and don't typically cause injuries. And they can be made more effective by adding Skunk into the mix.

So basically, they want to microwave protestors.

And chain mail with fine loops of chain suddenly becomes very popular...

Many employment agreements have an NDA that survives for a certain period after employment has ended. But that typically covers trade secrets, customer lists, financial data, etc. I doubt anyone can stop you from talking about your subjective experience at a place of employment.

Given that the US military's very strength kept the world relatively peaceful

That was true from 1945 through 2024. But in case you missed it, that old world order has been destroyed by the current US administration and it may never return. It's not simply a matter of the current administration being "warmongering". It's actively attacking the rules-based order that had kept the world relatively stable and peaceful for about 80 years. The future looks very uncertain and quite scary to me.

I never said that having web files not owned by the web user makes your site secure. I just said that it's not a good idea to have files in the WEBROOT that are writable by the web user because that makes defacing a site or even running malware in clients' web browsers trivial.

My personal web site uses PHP, but I don't use a database because the site is simple enough not to require one. I use PHP more-or-less as a templating engine to include standard boilerplate headers and footers on all of the pages.

Having Web server files owned by the web user is a security risk; if someone executes code as the web user, they can change those files.

If the files are owned by root, then they can't be defaced by the web user.

If you need to have writable files, then those should be in a separate directory that's not part of the WEBROOT.