Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Cars are bad mmkay (Score 1) 54

If you live anywhere but the urban core, cars are a necessity.

Yes, in North America. Because of deliberate planning choices made in the past by politicians spurred on by the auto lobby.

Reversing those choices will be well-nigh impossible and hugely expensive. But living with those choices is also hugely expensive and damaging. Basically, in North America, we're screwed by decades of bad choices. I live in a suburb of a Canadian city (about 10km from the core) and I have a car. I wish I didn't have to have a car because car ownership is expensive and a pain in the ass, but because of bad planning on the part of my city, I'm stuck with one.

Delivery is a red herring. Amsterdam (as I mentioned in another comment) is a very compact, dense city with narrow streets where most trips are not done by car, and yet trucks and vans somehow manage deliveries just fine. It comes down to choices and proper city design.

Comment Re:Cars are bad mmkay (Score 2) 54

How many people on an average commute are carrying a significant amount of cargo, though?

Amsterdam is a dense city with many choices for modes of transport. The streets are pretty narrow, yet they somehow manage to get goods delivered just fine. And the trucks and vans that need to deliver the goods can actually get through pretty fast, despite the narrow streets, because there's much less car traffic to contend with.

Comment Re:Same 5h17t they said about TV in the 70s (Score 2) 21

Engagement-driven social media is not the same as TV. It is far more addictive and far more dangerous both to individuals' mental health and to society at large.

If I were Dictator of Earth, I'd ban Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and TikTok completely. But I'm not, so I'll take what I can get and if it starts with age restrictions, that's fine.

Comment Re:No kidding... (Score 1) 207

There's this. And the largest increase might not be Americans leaving the USA for Canada, but rather people who would have chosen to go to the USA choosing Canada instead.

If an academic has a 180-day visa, then why would they want to buy a house? That makes no sense; renting for three months makes far more sense.

And yes, I'm not denying our healthcare system has its problems. Simply (re)stating that it's far better than the US system for most people.

Comment Re:No kidding... (Score 1) 207

There is no Canadian ban on foreigners buying houses if the foreigners have a right to live in Canada and plan on living in the houses.

Taxes in Canada are higher than the US... though by the time you add in medical insurance premiums, the difference is much less. And corporate taxes in Canada are not much higher than in the US at all. (I ran a company in Canada for 19 years, and not having to pay expensive health insurance for employees gave us a big competitive advantage over US companies.)

Our health care system is overcrowded and has its problems, but I'll take it over the US one any day of the week. We have higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality rates despite spending less per capita on healthcare than the US.

And it's not a wish. It's something that's already happening.

Slashdot Top Deals

The reward of a thing well done is to have done it. -- Emerson

Working...