Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:NO!!! (Score 1) 175

Last time I tried Claude bandwagon was less than a month ago. The problem is not checking if the code generated is conforming to some standard, but rather that AI has problems understanding the algorithms, and I guess that, at least in my field, things will get worse, given the amount of AI-written papers that are being published.

Just an example...I am referee for three major scientific journals. I recently rejected a paper full of wrong reasoning, inconsistent data, and it was clearly AI generated by someone who was not an expert in the field. Well, the very same paper appeared near verbatim on an IEEE journal a few months later. So more garbage added to the pile of manure...but AI will eat it back again without problems. Can you guess how this will evolve ? GUI are trivial to generate, it is the correctness of the algorithms behind them that should make us worried about.

Comment NO!!! (Score 1) 175

I develop - among other tasks - multidimensional signal processing algorithms for a F500 company.

Since part of my work is about studying technical papers, and (if the algorithms makes sense to me) converting the equations into python/C++ code, I wanted to test Claude & c. on this.

Results were incredibly laughable, and most of them resulted into a code that was doing the wrong thing. Game over for me.

Comment In other words... (Score 1) 45

> That's what I like about open source. Someone shares a piece, someone else sees a possibility, and we get to keep building it together.
 

...so someone has a brilliant idea and puts time and efferts to make it available for everybody for free, and someone else makes money out of it...

Slashdot Top Deals

Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso

Working...