Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Books

Slashdot Asks: What Are Some Books You Liked Reading This Year? 112

What are some books that you read this year that you enjoyed reading? Doesn't have to be those that released this year -- though if possible, mention any recently published books.

Further reading: Ask Slashdot: What's a 2021 Movie or TV Show That You Enjoyed Watching?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Slashdot Asks: What Are Some Books You Liked Reading This Year?

Comments Filter:
  • The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name by Brian C. Muraresku https://www.amazon.com/Immorta... [amazon.com]
    • THE BIBLE (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      THE BIBLE
    • The federalist papers are jaw dropping. You just would not believe how smart these guys were and hiw they laid out the problem and how they threaded the needle solving it. The most amazing thing is how they foreclosed each edge case except for one . There was one edge case they fully admit they have no solution for. Unfortunately it seems we are in the grips of that right now. Here's a few tidbits, tinier that 3/5ths compromise on slavery everyone looks at as racist. Well it might be that too but at the

      • by geekd ( 14774 )

        Windup Girl is great!

      • Read the anti-federalist papers too. It's good to see both sides of the debates our founders had. There were wise men on both sides of many of the debated issues and both sides got things right [and wrong].

        • by clovis ( 4684 )

          Read the anti-federalist papers too. It's good to see both sides of the debates our founders had. There were wise men on both sides of many of the debated issues and both sides got things right [and wrong].

          Yep.
          As I recall, it was the anti-federalists demands that got Madison to write and add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution.

        • People forget that the Federalists mostly lost the argument.

          And the people who advocate for the Federalist Papers today are mostly extreme anti-Federalists by their policies. They don't actually read them, they just heard that's what makes the case for the right-wingers so they recommend it blindly. In the same way they advocate 1984.

          There are some good parts to the Federalist Papers, though.

          Among the most formidable of the obstacles which the new Constitution will have to encounter may readily be distinguished the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments; and the perverted ambition of another class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government.

          From Federalist #1

      • I'll add a few more really satisfying fiction series:

        If you enjoy Jeeves and Wooster as channeled by Hugh Laurie and steven fry then the book on tapes written by Ben Schott are exquisite . Jeeves and the king of clubs is the first and has the best narrator voicing it . There's lots of imitators and homages to that famous set of books but this author really nails the verbal wit , characters and door slamming farce of the originals. It might even be better than the originals .

        Two books by graham Moore, unr

        • by shanen ( 462549 )

          Small world syndrome? I've been reading Wodehouse and Holmes pastiche novels over the last year. Or are you talking about the continuation novels of Jeeves? Which reminds me of the continuation novels of Nero Wolfe. Some of the continuations aren't too bad, though most have been kind of disappointing.

          • In the Sherlock Holmes vein I enjoyed Andy weirs novelette called prof moriarty, consulting criminal. An amusing reversal of the usual point of view. What shelockiana or Wodehouse continuations did you enjoy?

            • by shanen ( 462549 )

              I only know of two Wodehouse continuations because I stumbled over them at a local library, but I haven't read them yet. Let me dig it up... Must be Ben Schott? You mentioned him, too. Deeper dig came up with nothing else in English, but a couple translations of some sort of miscellany?

              Digging further, I discovered that Jeeves and Wooster is a specific reference and there is one copy available at a different library (so I bookmarked the link for now). The CGI gateway is closed again, so it would take too

    • I plan to read this soon! Thanks.

  • Project Hail Mary (Score:5, Interesting)

    by wdr1 ( 31310 ) * <wdr1@p[ ]x.com ['obo' in gap]> on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:08PM (#62131725) Homepage Journal

    Ending up reading most of it in one weekend. I wouldn't say it's as good as The Martian, but it's up there.

    • A good dose of nerd crack.

      I read it too, also quickly. Very fun, also agree it's not as good as The Martian. Ending was a bit trite, I guess structurally, the near-end final "unexpected" disaster is fine, but made the structure near enough identical to The Martian.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      In some ways a bit disappointing, in others pretty good. Definitely hard science mixed with a nice story. I would say it is well worth the read.

    • I didn't enjoy it. I think there's a narrative style there that was good the first time I encountered it, which was the Bobiverse books. But other titles have appeared since, this being one, with a very similar tone.
    • by dargaud ( 518470 )
      I read it last week and enjoyed it a lot... except for one glaring plot hole. [SPOILER AHEAD] When the predators eat the astrophage, where does all the energy go ?!? They've got tanks of it with trillions of joules of energy, and it turns to poop in hours without so much as heating up.
  • by jddj ( 1085169 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:09PM (#62131727) Journal

    Michael Lewis' real life story of how a dozen or so bright people planned for and reacted to a pandemic, and how the US's governments and fragmented public health system let us all down.

    Interesting read. Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but these folks were planning for a pandemic long before 2019.

    Lewis is the author of Moneyball, The Big Short and others.

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      Everything he writes has been excellent. But I get them from the libraries and that one hasn't become available yet. (At least not in English.)

  • by MysteriousPreacher ( 702266 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:10PM (#62131729) Journal

    A biography of the marquis de Lafayette. Four chapters in and loving it.

  • The author of Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell.

  • by geekd ( 14774 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:12PM (#62131735) Homepage

    Fantasy:
    * The Cradle series by Will Wight is fantastic. It starts a little slow, but by halfway through the first book it picks up nicely. Currently at 10 books.

    History:
    * A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson is more a history of science, but is still excellent
    * The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire by Kyle Harper
    * Lost to the West: The Forgotten Byzantine Empire That Rescued Western Civilization by Lars Brownworth
    * Powers and Thrones: A New History of the Middle Ages by Dan Jones

    Biography:
    * The Storyteller by Dave Grohl is really good if you are a punk / grunge / Nirvana / Foo Fighters fan.

    • Ah, I'd forgotten - Collapse, How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed but Jarrod Diamond. A brilliant exposition of how a number of societies failed historically (Pitcairn, Greenland, Maya).
  • The Culture series (Score:5, Interesting)

    by garyisabusyguy ( 732330 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:19PM (#62131751)

    I read The Culture Series by Iain M Banks

    Found it enjoyable and worth the time

    Have a Neal Stephenson novel still in package from Amazon to read after start of the year

    • The Culture books are some of my all-time favorites. So easy to get lost in the idea of a post-scarcity, but still challenging universe
    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      The Culture series is exceptional. Too bad there will not be any more entries.

      • Yes, I have wondered how deeply I want to read into the rest of Banks' other works to get some more of the good stuff

        • by gweihir ( 88907 )

          Yes, I have wondered how deeply I want to read into the rest of Banks' other works to get some more of the good stuff

          Difficult to say. His other stuff was a mixed bag for me: Some good, some ok, some not my thing. Nothing really on "Culture" level though.

        • You might try "The Hydrogen Sonata", the last of the Culture series. I found it hilarious with all the dialog between the AI ships. Also recommend "The Algebraist" as a non-culture space sci-fi from Iain M. Banks. I'm not a fan of horror, and Mr. Banks included that in some of the Culture books to their detriment.

          I'm currently reading "The Apocalypse Factory" by Steve Olson. The semi-definitive atomic bomb history by Richard Rhodes is very East-coast / U235 centric. Steve Olsen's book gives a better

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      Another second on the late and much lamented Iain M Banks. Transitions was a partial exception as a non-Culture SF book he wrote, but I didn't think that one was as good as the Culture stuff.

  • Beware of Chicken, on Royal Road. By synopsis it's a standard Isekai (a person reborn in another world), Cultivation (eastern-themed fantasy novel based around Qi) novel. In reality it's a subversion of almost every trope in the genre. It's well-written and one of the best things I've read online in years.

    For a more traditional novel, I really enjoyed The House in the Cerulean Sea by T.J. Klune. Very reminiscent of a better written Harry Potter.

    • by geekd ( 14774 )

      Beware of Chicken is awesome! on Royal Road, I am also enjoying He Who Fights With Monsters

      • I liked He Who Fights when it first started, and I'm still reading it, but the further on it gets the more it seems to tell, rather than show. I'm thoroughly enjoying Dungeon Crawler Carl though.

  • by shoor ( 33382 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:23PM (#62131757)

    by Joshua Muravchik. Published about 20 years ago so definitely not new. I happened to see Mr Muravchik on an old PBS talk show called "Think Tank" years back and made a mental note to read the book someday. With the pandemic going on, I finally got around to it.

    On the talk show the author said he'd been a 'Red Diaper Baby', that is, raised by socialist/communist oriented parents. He was 'turned' you might say, in the way that Darth Vader told the Emperor that Luke Skywalker might be 'turned' (am I remembering that scene right?). Anyway, he's critical of socialism but sort of sympathetic at the same time, which is a refreshing perspective on the subject.

  • by quonset ( 4839537 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @04:33PM (#62131793)

    The Light of Other Days by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter. Not a great book, but it did provide some fodder for how being able to see anything at any time (figuratively and literally) might affect society. The idea that any crime could be discovered, that all the backroom secrets of corporations and governments would be known, is an interesting prospect. In addition, being able to go to any point in space and at any time and observe what took place would bolster science.

    Fair Game by Valerie Plame Wilson. It was interesting to read her own words about how she got involved in the CIA, some (very broad) outlines of things she did, and then how the Bush administration revealed her while being an undercover CIA agent for political purposes, and what she went through during that time.

    However, what I found hilarious were all the redactions. For obvious reasons she wasn't allowed to disclose certain names, locations or what she was doing, but when you come across two to three entire pages fully redacted, you have to wonder how the word 'the' or 'and' could possibly disclose a national secret or reveal sources. Fortunately, the publisher put in an appendix of some of the material which was redacted so you could get a more full picture what she was talking about.

    Neuromancer by William Gibson. While moderately intersting, I'm apparently missing something as it wasn't as great as many have made it out. Maybe I wasn't in the correct frame of mind or just didn't understand all the concepts.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The most interesting idea in The Light Of Other Days was being able to see into the past, to resolve all those otherwise unsolvable mysteries. What happened to Amelia Earhart, who shot JFK, who D.B. Cooper is and what happened to him.

      For months afterwards I was feeling the chilling effect of potential future viewers watching me in the past, but I did a bit of research and the tech is probably BS so no need to worry. Anyway, I'm not that interesting compared to all the other people they could be spying on.

      Th

    • by mamba-mamba ( 445365 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @05:13PM (#62131907)
      I think you are just too late for Neuromancer. It broke new ground at the time. I have not gone back to re-read it. But I can imagine that maybe it isn't as revelatory now as it would have been back then. But it inspired and informed a lot of sci/fi stuff that has come along since for sure. If you haven't already, maybe try The Peripheral and/or Agency (also by Gibson).
      • by bardrt ( 1831426 )

        I think you are just too late for Neuromancer. It broke new ground at the time. I have not gone back to re-read it.

        I just started it for the second time recently (lost my place in the e-book due to an unsynced device, derp).

        I'm only partway through it, but what's the neatest to me is seeing where so much of the genre basically "originated".

        I don't think it's possible to be "too late" for Neuromancer, you just have to go into it realizing that the reason it might feel derivative is because so much of what's out there in the genre actually came after it took their cues from it.

    • I got my first Kindle 3 months ago and so catching up after years of sparse reading. Neuromancer was on the shortlist and so I read it, and Snow Crash which I probably preferred. I smashed through Dune in about 4 days. The ('21) movie is closely aligned. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley - perhaps showing its age a little. Red Rising, Golden Son and Morning Star by Pierce Brown. A great trilogy that I'm about 5 hours from finishing .
  • One of the best books I read this year, is Forgotten in Death, the latest in the long-running series of police procedurals taking place in a near future that's somewhat different than ours. The series is known as in Death [wikipedia.org] because all but one of the over fifty novels has a three word title, with the last to being "in Death." The books are all written by J.D. Robb, a pseudonym for Nora Roberts simply to avoid having too many new books under her name being on the shelf at the same time. If you like well plo
  • Intended to be a zombie novel with plausible science, the first part is eerily similar to the beginning of the COVID pandemic.

    • Only John Ringo book I read was "The Last Centurion".

      John Ringo is clearly a skilled writer: his command of voice is very good. The action is clear and well paced.

      On the other hand...

      After our hero trundles across Iraq solving it in the process with the help of Fox News, a global pandemic hits and LIBERALS DIE because they're LIBERALS haha suck it VEGETARIAN LIBERALS! Subtle.

      Oh and the protagonist has a thing for, well, not yet legal age girls. And he gets some handed to him in the form of a collection of p

      • I should add:

        Did I enjoy it? well... not exactly, but I did finish, and it's quite memorable and it's not boring. He's a good writer as I mentioned and many of the scenes are very compelling. Though my reading was accompanied with many chuckles and exasperated head shakes. So there you go.

        Would I read another John Ringo? Probably not, but I wouldn't rule it out.

      • The "wifely edits" were great.

        There was some thoughtful commentary about high-trust societies as well.

        And the disaster that follows when the socialists send city people out to farm in the name of equality has historical basis in the Soviet Union. During the last election wasn't it Bloomberg who said farming is easy, you just put seeds in the ground and they come up? Proved he was an imbecile really quick.

        And I'll correct your sig,

        The American right despises California is because they refuse to admit when th

        • The American right despises California is because they refuse to admit when their policies have failed, and then try to export their failures to other locations that are doing just fine.

          The richest state is a failure because waahh

          • California attracts the people who can afford to live there because it has the nicest weather, with the possible exception of the even more expensive Hawaii. People live there in spite of the social and economic policies, not because of them.
            • California attracts the people who can afford to live there because it has the nicest weather, with the possible exception of the even more expensive Hawaii. People live there in spite of the social and economic policies, not because of them.

              Oh I see, the vast array of social and political issues don't exist, it's just "the weather". Cool.

  • Great book series. Disaster of a movie.
  • by shanen ( 462549 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @05:13PM (#62131905) Homepage Journal

    The Enigma of Reason by Mercier and Sperber was probably the best one I've seen this year. Let me see if I can dig up a capsule review...

    Worth a capsule summary here, along with a strange application to solving the mystery of Twitter's continued existence. Their basic thesis is that we mostly act (and speak) without thinking and without reason, but when questioned we immediately and effortlessly explain why--and most of the reasons are just rationalizations, but with a "my-side" bias because "my" habitual or thoughtless actions must have been "fitting and proper". One of the most interesting research results reported in the book was that we tend to be much more skeptical about the same reasons if someone else uses them. Intellectual honesty is a one-way street? But their heavy conclusion is that in dialog we can negotiate good reasons and even find the best solutions for complicated problems. So does that explain why Twitter still exists? If you look at the global view of Twitter, it's a cesspool, but maybe, among some small groups of mutual followers, it actually creates value? "Come now, let us reason together [on Twitter]." (Apologies to King James or gawd?) But just don't try to explain all the reasons for every step that applied to leaving your chair and opening that door...

    In lighter news, I just wrote a trivial comparative quasi-review of Penguin Highway with Version Zero and Of Ants and Dinosaurs (though not sure I'd go so far as to recommend any of them).
    https://wt.social/post/good-bo... [wt.social]

    • by xof ( 518138 )
      See also 'The Mind Is Flat: The Remarkable Shallowness of the Improvising Brain' by Nick Chater.
      • by shanen ( 462549 )

        Thanks for the reference, though I almost missed your low-visibility comment. No karma bonus and short? Unfortunately it doesn't appear to be available in any of the local public libraries, even in translation.

  • https://www.callingbullshit.or... [callingbullshit.org]

    It's a bit terse sometimes, but still a good read.

  • Three come to mind (Score:4, Interesting)

    by PuddleBoy ( 544111 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @05:22PM (#62131949)
    Quiet - fascinating look into the minds/habits of introverts

    Blink - how the human mind is able to make snap decisions based on very limited information, and still be right
    Inside of a Dog - OK, I have had dogs most of my life, so that drew me to the book. It takes a look at the very different "umwelt" of a dog (compared to us) and how their senses drive their actions in ways that we humans would not immediately recognize

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      Don't recognize the first one, but if you're recommending Malcolm Gladwell, all of his books that I've read have been worth the time. Don't always fully agree with him. Most recently I read The Bomber Mafia about the shift to carpet firebombing.

  • Evolution: A Developmental Approach [amazon.ca] by Wallace Arthur. It's the most clearly laid-out synthesis of evo-devo work that I've read.
  • While they are currently ongoing series - I've really enjoyed Marko Kloos' Frontlines and Palladium Wars books. I just wish it wasn't a year between releases...

    On the non-scifi side of things, I also found Anthony Doerr's All the Light We Cannot See quite compelling.

    Oh, and I found Doris Kearns Goodwin's No Ordinary Time a very interesting/informative look at Elanor and Franklin Roosevelt's life while he was president.

  • I enjoyed reading the Seth material from Jane Roberts.

    Seth material from Jane Roberts

    https://sethcenter.com/ [sethcenter.com]

    Happy holidays :-)

    • You might also enjoy:

      * The Law of One, Book One: By Ra an Humble Messenger
      * Bashar
      * Dolores Cannon's The Convoluted Universe series
      * Abraham Hicks' Law of Attraction books. e.g. The Vortex: Where the Law of Attraction Assembles All Cooperative Relationships ... Ask and It Is Given: Learning to Manifest Your Desires
      * Kryon
      * Ram Dass' classic Be Here Now
      * Robert Monroe's classic Journeys Out of the Body. The technical follow up by Thomas Campbell is My Big Toe: A Trilogy Unifying Philosophy, Physics, and Met

      • Thank you UnknownSoldier, I also read books from/about Law of One (I think it is good but perhaps a bit distorted), Bashar, Abraham Hicks (the most crisp/clear in my opinion), and Robert Monroe, but I will look into Dolores Cannon, Kryon and Ram Dass, I don't know those :-)

        The books from Michael Newton are also excellent. https://www.newtoninstitute.or... [newtoninstitute.org]

        And for those who like to do cleanses, I recommend this liver and gallbladder cleanse book from Andreas Moritz, I did it 48 times in the last 10 years, it

  • And its spinoff, Macbook Air.

  • written by John Steinbeck

    also a made into a move by the same name starring HenryFonda
  • by Barny ( 103770 ) on Friday December 31, 2021 @07:06PM (#62132255) Journal

    Thunder Below! by Eugene B. Fluckey.

    Fascinating to read how he revolutionized submarine combat and performed some of the most spectacular tours of WW2 by any submarine.

  • Solid writing and a great setting.
    • I liked The Way of Kings, and yes good writing but I found the stories get overblown - so much happening and everything so on the edge, overwhelming odds, invincible foes, near death, etc etc.
  • Best action story Iâ(TM)ve ever read and one the most flowing books.
  • Probably best of the year for me.

    Others are
    - "A Deadly Education" and "The Last Graduate": Pretty nice fantasy with a good main character and a new setting. (Well somewhat new...)
    - The last "murderbot" book (don't remember the title)

    Unfortunately, I also read or tried to read quite a few books that were not so good.

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      Who's the author on Hidden Library? Doesn't seem to be available locally. Skipping over the fantasy, I did manage to find two of the Martha Welles books in English in semi-local libraries.

  • In a small twist that still managed to surprise me, I found I actually rather enjoy them!
  • An engaging and beautifully written tour of the world of Neanderthal man, and of the amazing high-tech archaeology that is bringing it to light. The Neanderthals were as human as any of us, is basically the author's thesis, and she makes a convincing case that, at least, they were much more like us than we thought.
  • "When Narcissism Comes to Church" by Chuck DeGroat. While now I feel like I have a big hammer and see all my church problems as nails, it makes so much sense when you look especially at the pastors of large evangelical churches.
  • A detailed account of the development and deployment of nuclear weapons in the US during the cold war. There is a horrifying list of accidents, some of which only by luck avoided a nuclear explosion on US territory. The consideration of a pre-emptive strike on the Soviet Union. The military gaining control of the weapons from civilian control. All interspersed with a detailed account of the impact of a dropped wrench in a Titan silo, and the severe consequences.
  • I read the God Delusion 12 years ago and was let down by it, and skipped this book for a long time, but WOW. I loved this book, and it was the best book I read this year, and one of the best in the past 5 (although in fairness, 90% of books I read are tech skill books, so...)
    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      I read it long ago, but I mentioned recently reading a later book by the same author on the same topic. (But now I can't recall the title.)

  • by dhammabum ( 190105 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @12:40AM (#62132817)
    A series of novellas about a sentient SecUnit robot that hacks its governor and goes rogue who keeps a diary. Not great literature but clever - Wells has a great sense of humour.
  • You do not have to be particularly religious to find value in a better understanding of one of the documents that underpins the foundations of Western Civilization. Prager is not some evangelical Christian preacher shouting about hell or grinding an ideological axe; he's a Jewish guy with a deep understanding of his subject, and the book is a commentary (the text, broken into chunks with relevant, explanatory text) on one particularly important book of the Old Testament of the Bible (also one of the books o

    • Speaking of, the OG Exodus is well worth a read. It's far odder and more perverse than I remembered from many endless passovers.

  • I'm only about a third of the way through it, but enjoying it so far. I would say the style is closest to "REAMDE" or the first half of that book's sequel, "Fall", as in: it's near future speculative. It's got that same feel where all the characters have a wry sarcastic take on the world, which seems to fit. The topic is climate change, but instead of some big catastrophe it's a more realistic set of climate (and other) changes that people are very painfully adapting to. The pragmatism seems to give it
  • By Olan Thorensen. It's kind of a guilty pleasure. If you like books in the style of "A Connecticut yankee at King Arthur's court" about a lone guy cast in the past you'll love this one. It has 3 things going for it:
    • Likable characters
    • A good solution to the contradiction between the impossible/fantasy elements of time travel and the needed hard science and history aspect needed to make the story involving
    • Excellent military aspect, both tactical and strategic. Battle descriptions and politics are very good
  • By Kate Elliott. Really good sci-fi. Reminiscent of Iain M. Banks works. Best I read since he died.

    Other good sci-fi. in no particular order.
    The great symmetry - James R. Wells
    Machine - Elizabeth Bear

    And an oldie that recently became a tv-show: Foundation. And I'm sad that the creators had so little faith in the source material. To say that the show is based on the book is something in between a right out lie and a bad joke. The special effects are fine but why oh why did they think this story is better?

    • I haven't watched the show yet, but my understanding was that it was supposed to cover stuff that mostly wasn't in the books. Particularly how the Foundation got started. It's been a few decades since I read the books but I seem to remember that how the Foundation gets going is largely glossed over, with maybe a chapter or two explaining Harry Seldon.

  • And the Exiled Fleet, good old fashioned sci-fi and a stunning debut from the author.
    I tore through these on the road this year, really good!

  • by Stephen Chadfield ( 7971 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @09:27AM (#62133429) Homepage

    I am very late to the Clive Barker party but I read Weaveworld in 2021 and thought it was great. An unusual fantasy tale centred on Liverpool. I was surprised to find Barker a better writer than Stephen King.

  • Two series that I put a lot of hours into over the years wound up in 2021: Benedict Jacka's Alex Verus urban fantasy line and James Corey's Expanse books. I rate them both "acceptable". Winding up a series in a way that ties up all the loose ends but isn't a let down is a hard task.
  • I've really enjoyed Gideon the Ninth (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/42036538-gideon-the-ninth). I think it was Gizmodo that suggested it, characterizing it as "Lesbian Necromancers in Space." It's hyper-gothic, and the protagonist is delightful.

  • Dirk Pitt - a combination of James Bond and Jacques Cousteau. enjoyable reading.
  • The Day By Day Armageddon series and Tomorrow War (not the novel of the movie) by J. L. Bourne.
    Five Roads To Texas, multiple authors, Phalanx Press
    The Mountain Man series, Keith Blackmore
    The Terminal List, Jack Carr

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...