Comment The Life of Chuck (Score 1) 46
Movie pick: The Life of Chuck. Life-affirming in the face of all that life may throw at one (streaming on Hulu now).
Movie pick: The Life of Chuck. Life-affirming in the face of all that life may throw at one (streaming on Hulu now).
Chris Lattner: Future of Programming and AI | Lex Fridman Podcast. FRIDMAN: "What's been the response [to emojis] so far?" LATTNER: "Somewhere between, 'Oh, wow, that makes sense. Cool, I like new things,' to 'Oh my god, you're killing my baby.' Like, what are you talking about? This can never be. Like, I can never handle this. How am I gonna type this? (imitates bees buzzing) like, all these things. And so this is something where I think that the world will get there. We don't have to bet the whole farm on this. I think we can provide both paths, but I think it'll be great."
Runner-up: DOGE To Rewrite SSA Codebase In 'Months'.
From the AI@Purdue page: "Beginning in fall of 2026, we will implement an AI working competency graduation requirement through an expanded partnership with Google."
Prior to its approval by the Purdue Board of Trustees, Purdue President Mung Chiang and CEO of Google Public Sector Karen Dahut announced plans to introduce the new working AI competency graduation requirement in mid-November at the 2025 Google-Purdue AI Summit.
At a Sept. 2025 White House meeting, Google CEO Sundar Pichai committed $3 million to Code.org, the tech-backed nonprofit that is working towards a goal of requiring "all students to earn credit for an AI and CS course for high school graduation."
start your engines!
"Amazon Future Engineer is a comprehensive childhood-to-career program aimed at increasing access to computer science education for students from underserved and underrepresented communities."
First saw something like this 30+ years ago - someone grabbed a list of publicly available userIDs from the company's email system and apparently either manually or using a keyboard macro simply tried multiple times to logon with an incorrect password to lock out the entire company's thousands of user and team IDs. The company used mainframe systems/databases with centralized passwords, so didn't take long at all (not even 30 minutes, IIRC) to get everyone back in business. One imagines that such a simple 'attack' - essentially the same as what the guy did some 30 years later in 2021 - would wreak a lot more havoc in today's world with its overwhelmingly-complicated intertwined security layers, which are further compounded by the need to get consensus from a number of parties - e.g., security, risk, compliance, governance, operations, legal - that it's safe to reopen things for business even after a fix is identified. It seems part of this guy's hefty sentence is likely attributable to businesses relying on systems and infrastructure and bureaucracy that are vulnerable to and unable to recover quickly from even trivial 'attacks' like this that leave systems and data untouched, no?
The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.