You are just splitting hairs whenever I make a point.
No I'm splitting paragraphs whenever I have a point. Zing!
But no, you're dismissing arguments you don't like without addressing them. Your philosophy seems to be based on what biology wants. I claim, biology wants nothing so your entire line of reasoning is void.
You're also glomming on to my individual words (like "outside") while completely ignoring the point. Free will is very poorly defined. Every definition you use I can pick holes in. So, when you claim being gay is a matter of free will, I claim your argument is invalid because you can't even define what free will is.
In fact you have an incredibly black and white view of the world which doesn't account for the large amount of nuance present. You dismiss anything not fitting this as "pedantry", "splitting hairs" or other things.
You are also willfully ignoring half the points I'm making by playing dumb, viz:
what claim did I make that you require evidence of?
You claimed biology cares who people have sex with. There is no evidence biology cares about anything.
You're claiming gay people are mentally ill, again with no evidence. You cite a something thoroughly discredited as evidence even that itself had no evidence for it which is why its now discredited.
Oh yeah, you claimed a gay gang was the second largest (? or merely very large) in the country or some gang filled area or something. Again, not a single little morsel to back that up.
Would you like me to continue?
if there was any kind of evidence that being gay is an immutable trait one is born with, then you would have cited it long ago.
I've given the same example something like 4 times now. Instead of addressing it, you pretend I never gave it. I shall not give it again, but this another great example of you simple making shit up to fit your prejudices. If you don't like some evidence, just keep pretending your opponent never gave it until he gives up!
If we observed a cell that refused to divide, we would say it is dead or inert.
No, we don't. Heart, brain and neural cells don't generally divide in adults. That's why neurological injuries or heart attacks have such long term effects. I can assure you however that my heart cells are very much alive. Red and white blood cells don't divide either.
Oh there you go! There's another thing you claimed without evidence which is not in fact true.
If we observed a domesticated animal refusing to mate, we would take it to a doctor and ask what is wrong with it.
Doe that apply to any of the following domesticated animals: mules, hinnies, capons, bullocks, gelding, steers, barrows or wethers?. Does it apply to spayed or neutered dogs and cats too? The very fact we have those words proves that we place considerable value on animals for purposes other than mating.
You keep putting forth the "fact" that mating is the only goal in life. This is not a fact. It does not matter how much you mate. In 1e9 years, the earth will run out of free carbon. In 2 or 3e9, the earth will scorch because of the rising luminosity of the sun. In 6e9 years, the earth will fall into the sun and be consumed. Eventually the sun will cool to a black dwarf, red dwarfs will burn out and stellar formation will cease. Breeding won't delay that.
There is no moral reasoning or feel-good explanation needed here. We see how biological machines are generally supposed to operate.
No, we take a non-breeding animal to the vet only if we want it to breed for some specific purpose. We don't attempt to fix every example of non-breeding because we claim to be some enforcer of how biological machines are supposed (and supposed by whom?) to operate. In fact we purposely create animals that can't breed.
Penis is made for vagina,
No, it's not made for: it evolved for. Splitting hairs? You'd like to think so, but no. You lack precision in language when trying to debate precise things. This is why you're doing so badly, because you fuzz over things with imprecise language then use that fuzz for reasoning. I give you something more precise:
Penis is made for vagina, it is just a coincidence that it works for butts and mouths and titties and feet and microwaved cantaloupes.
Our penis evolved for that (and peeing on things), but so what? That means less than nothing, because evolution does not care. At some point our brains then further evolved to take advantage of all the other things a penis could be used with. Our brains (and those of bonobos too) have evolved to take pleasure in getting off by what ever means. We've even identified some of the mechanisms and neurotransmitters involved.
Deviate from this intended behavior, and assume the role of aberration.
Do you believe that evolution intended for us to live in cities, operate computers? If so then you're being aberrant 24/7 instead of (according to you) a gay person being aberrant at most a few hours per week.
Anyway your philosophy is flawed because not only does evolution not have "intent" but the very notion is actually against evolution. If evolution had a purpose and everything operated precisely as intended then further evolution could not occur.
but if you are drawn to behavior that is fundamentally opposed to life itself
You just equated not wanting to have children with wanting to wipe out all life. You're certifiable.