If even Jar-jar can understand mRNA vaccines, maybe there's somebody out there who can explain to Wormdome?

If you weren't a worm-brain you'd realize you're arguing for approval, because it's not the FDA's job to decide which drugs are preferable for obtuse reasons. It's their job to evaluate them for safety and effectiveness. If it's equally effective and equally safe, then it's up to doctors to choose which to prescribe.

There is, "Underrated"

Well Dingus, there's already a bunch of AI apps people run on their phones that do this, so you might as well just throw it in the ocean and start writing letters. Or your manifesto.

It wouldn't work for "securing the future of civilization," even if they were able to overcome the mountain of difficult and expensive engineering challenges.

Any sort of calamity that put human life on Earth in peril would mean the lunar colony would stop receiving support from Earth and would die off long before the last holdouts Earthside.

There's an incredibly long list of things they'd need shipped up to survive, none of which are needed on Earth. Because on Earth you can survive by primitive means if necessary.

That's not reading, though, it's skimming.

A really weird hobby, but I guess you're probably just daydreaming and holding a book.

If you really actually are actively skimming for that much time, and not just spacing out, it really is exceptionally odd.

So if you just lift the cheesy poof fast enough, it's a life-extending workout?

No, you cannot retrofit existing filtration systems to support the "low" temperature of 500C. I hope that helps.

Doga is dog yoga, so it must be an avocado were-cat attacking a European yogi dog?

You have no idea how moronic that is. You simply don't know! It's pathetic.

Yes, "AFAIK" is a fucking guess. It translates to "I don't know," the rest is superfluous window dressing used by idiots who like to pretend they know what they're talking about, but what to hedge a little in case somebody calls their bullshit.

You're as dumb as a flat earther. "You can't prove I know better. Maybe I do believe it."

The first half is wrong. Accepting ad money from you doesn't give you any rights over them. What matters is where the money is accepted, not who it is accepted from.

The legal issues are mostly about the offices.

Stop arguing from ignorance. If you don't know about the research they're talking about there is no utility in just waving your hands and spewing whatever comes to mind, including your guesses.

You don't even realize that "fundamentally different ways to see the world" might involve brain differences. That the brain is where you "see the world." Here you're accidentally agreeing, though you don't know it. Agreeing from ignorance. You just assign a "no" to it arbitrarily.

Hitler did not get "voted into office," that's a stupid lie that wouldn't repeat if you'd even skimmed over the history.

That's... horrifying.

So you're basically mad that MIT isn't the Thought Police for all their researchers, and they don't impose a dictatorial Single Opinion on them? And worse, you're mad they don't impose a Single Result!

I don't know if you've considered this, but perhaps the actual problem is that you're already an idiot, and trying to use AI like a brain prosthetic so you can pretend you're smarht?