This is slashdot; that's the most contact he'll have with a woman all year!

I think in China accusing the person who sold you something of false advertising might get you thrown in jail for choosing to quarrel, unless it's really blatant.

If you're quarreling with an AI it might just make you look irrationally anti-social.

In the US the liability rests 100% on the company, and 0% on the salesperson, so AI or not doesn't change liability at all. Just like the salesperson being clueless (or not) rarely matters.

You didn't understand the words you're replying to.

That's a tip, not an invitation to argue.

Source: Am active investor, did read filing

I wonder if it would skip over your ad for it?

Search engines no longer allow for literal keyword searches, so the answer still won't be indexed anywhere.

I think I watched that same video last week. (at 2x)

When a single thing is being reviewed, that's not much of a statement. It actually parses to, "it works." Oracle wouldn't have needed to spend anything.

It's a bit more complicated than that. Here's a bigger quote (from the filing):

In other words, there's no problem, but accounting rules require that they use these words. However, they do have a plan.

For context, S&P Global Market Intelligence rates their financial health at 57/100, on a scale where 50 means average. Their debt load isn't very high, and almost all of it is residual from covid-era losses.

It's just another horseshit story, probably written by somebody shorting the stock.

The article is paywalled, but you're not supposed to read media articles claiming to characterize research anyway.

The PNAS link does give the abstract.

The first problem with your analysis is right here: "this will be."

Not at all. This is a mouse model study. As with the vast majority of mouse model studies, it will either not work in humans or not be safe in humans.

My guess is that you eat the mouse.

The summary was going pretty good until they falsely dragged Vietnam into it.

What the hiring manager knew and considered that you may not have is that the position would be raise over an academic post-doc research position.

"Intern" can mean a wide variety of things, from unpaid volunteer to a six figure assistant in a department where they have to evaluate your work before they can place you in a position. The latter is most common in areas where they need advanced workers but nobody has a degree in the specific thing they're doing; for example, hard drive research. It's an engineering job, except the knowledge needed is mostly held by people with physics degrees. Who may or may not be able to do engineering at all, depending on their personality.

"Ghosting people" who applied to a job but aren't being selected for it has been the normal, most common state of affairs for at least the thousands of years that we have written records.

It's clearly not unethical, since it is the norm. (Look up what "ethics" actually means; I suspect you'd be surprised, and you thought it meant morally just.)

Gaming the hiring websites, posting fake listings, those are legit accusations of misconduct. But when you bundle them with normal behavior that you personally wish wasn't normal, it completely destroys your credibility as an accuser.

He's not hiring anybody, he's a neckbeard who roleplays on slashdot because they banned him from all the games.

In the 90s SE always meant Sales Engineer.

Maybe you just haven't worked much in places where the clients, and potential clients, have engineers involved in the purchasing decisions? (Because the customers are also tech companies)