Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Which brings up the question (Score 1) 212

Reading recreationally is a choice and reflects (in some small part) education and emotional/intellectual development. Did you grow up eager to learn new things?

I wonder what the level of recreational reading is (relative to the general population) with the slashdot community... We tend to be educated and intellectually 'busy'.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I always have a stack of books waiting for me to read. I even installed a wall-light to make reading in bed easier.

Comment Bernie Krause (Score 2) 49

Does anyone remember Bernie Krause - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... - who gave us (among other things) Gorillas in the Mix?

He sampled lots of animal sounds (late 1980's), then used those samples as the basis of various (electronic) musical instruments. An elephant was the bass and even the tiny sound of a crayfish snapping its claw was used as the sound of a drum stick lightly tapping a cymbal.

Seemed pretty cool at the time...

Comment Translation can be an art (Score 5, Insightful) 38

Looking up words in a dictionary, looking up syntax in a style guide, are fine for translating grocery lists and simple news stories.

But once you hit more nuanced work (novels, poetry, etc.), translation can be a real art. I watch a fair bit of German-language television, though I'm a native-English speaker. And it's always interesting to hear what is said, then look at the subtitles. You get a feel for how a language is evolving.

Translation involves making choices about both the literal and implied meanings of words, grammar, syntax. It can even require a knowledge of the social, economic and cultural environment that the work was written in.

I have trouble believing that AI can interpret nuanced meanings. Humans need years of experience to convey meaning accurately.

Comment Brings a smile to my face (Score 4, Insightful) 71

All of us here have seen good, bad and mediocre software and hardware development over the last 40+ years. We've even gotten used to seemingly-endless bugs as evidence of ever-progressing functions. Identify, correct, come out with the next rev.

But when I think of the mindset that developed spacecraft for NASA in the 60s & 70s, they never had that luxury. It (mostly) had to be right the first time. Very limited chance to correct it later. Roadside service calls not an option.

So when I hear about a device on Voyager that has been off for 40+ years and is suddenly needed, and it still works, I'm like OMFG. Engineers toiled over that to make sure it was rock solid. It was personal to them. It was dedication, intellectual rigor and pride.

It's rather uplifting.

Slashdot Top Deals

The moving cursor writes, and having written, blinks on.

Working...