No, the judge isn't lying to the jury, the judge is reading a set of jury instructions that were agreed on by all of the lawyers involved in the case during a conference with the judge. And, each of the instructions is in written form and must be read out to the jury exactly as written. If one or more of those instructions includes a statement that under certain specific circumstances that the jury MUST find the defendant guilty, that's what the judge tells the jury, no ifs ands or buts.

People don't even want to work in the office. Why expect someone to come in for an interview?

Just make an in-person interview part of the hiring process. If they want to know why, give them some mumbo jumbo about security requirements. And don't worry about chasing away legitimate applicants; if they're not willing to come in for an interview, they're unlikely to make good employees.

Those monkeyflowers better watch out for tiger lilies

Yes! If those monkey flowers make too much trouble, Tiger Lily will pluck them all.

Just to toss in a bit on film trivia, those recliners were invented by Alan Hale Sr., who played Little John in the Errol Flynn version of Robin Hood, and was The Skipper's father.

I too am retired, but at the end of my career, I was doing mostly tech support by phone. Not in the phone firewall, or reading cheat sheets to callers, but at senior level, where either the cheat sheets didn't help, or, more likely, where the juniors had picked the wrong one. That meant that I actually had to know how to fix things on my own rather than hoping that I could guess which canned response would work, and an AI probably wouldn't be any help, because if it could fix things, the junior wouldn't have needed my help.

Why don't these projects get into Xray lasers or radio wave lasers?

We've been using them for almost half a century. There's even a special name for them that you might be familiar with: Maser. They work quite well in communications and have probably a large number of applications that I'll let you find for yourself if you're interested.

I doubt that you've ever bothered to try to understand my posts, preferring to assume that I wrote what you wanted me to, but let me assure you that your apparent assumption is completely wrong in this case. I have never written or implied that I know the answer to that question, and your claim here that I have just goes to prove that you can't be bothered to understand what's written before making a "reply" that only goes to show your own ignorance.

Just because we don't understand or experience other higher or lower realities does not mean they do not exist. Besides, we have evidence that they do, it's just that fundamentalists refuse to consider examining the evidence and refuse to question thier own assumptions and beliefs.

The same could be said about atheists.

That is unless anyone has definitive and incontrovertible proof to the contray. I'm sure we'd all appreciate seeing it.

Remember, the lack of proof that something exists is not, in itself, proof that it doesn't exist.

I can remember when they did this with glass bottles, back in the '50s and '60s, but it was called a deposit. You paid a few cents more when you bought whatever it was, usually soda, beer or booze, and got it back when you brought in the empties, even if it wasn't the same store you bought it from. There were even homeless, or nearly homeless people salvaging them from dumpsters to buy food or whatever.

That said, if you have employees who are determined to hurt your company, you have an HR problem not a technical one.

You might want to take a moment and ask why your employees are that determined to harm your company. Have they learned that your company is breaking the law or otherwise acting in harmful ways and want to put a stop to it? If so, they're whistleblowers, and may actually have your company's best interests at heart. Leaving them alone, or even helping them may well be your best choice, unless you're personally involved in those actions. Are they acting for political/economic/ideological/religious motives and really do want to harm your company? If so, blowing the whistle yourself may be the best thing you can do. There's no one right answer, it all depends on the circumstances.

If the voters don't want it, I don't care how persuasive the people pushing this think they are, they're just not going to get them to change their minds and vote for it. After all, everybody knows, or at least should know just how stubborn people are in Iowa. Once they've made up their minds, there's just no changing it, no matter what you do.

I usually listen to kxo1070 in Los Angeles at night...

If so, you're picking up signals from an alternate Earth. KXO broadcasts from El Centro, but not on 1070; what you're listening to is KNX, a Clear Channel station and one of the oldest radio stations in the USA.

The main reason that Copernicus's theory was accepted was that it required less epicycles than the Ptolemaic one. Then, Kepler came along and did away with them altogether.

I watched The Force Awakens in a theater when it first came out. It was so bad that I've never even considered watching another Star Wars movie and have completely given up on the franchise. The story line was so simple and the plot "twists" so obvious that it was clear to me that the writers were aiming for a target audience of ten year old boys. I guess that they must be pleasing lots of people because their movies are still making money, but I'm not one of them.

A American regime change War means we roll in and kill everyone in the existing government and replace them with whoever the fuck we want. We do not install a democracy. We might pretend to like we did in Afghanistan and Iraq but the people don't really get to pick who their leaders are we pick two or three options and they pick from a list.

Well, I'd have to say "yes and no" to that. Yes, it's true that they couldn't have voted the old regime back into power but no, we didn't give them a pre-picked list that only gave them Hobson's Choice. My understanding is that we let them nominate almost whoever they wanted (with the exception of known criminals) and let them vote for whoever they wanted from that list.