Windows 11 Now Comes With Its Own Adware (engadget.com) 82
An anonymous reader shares a report: It used to be that you could pay for a retail version of Windows 11 and expect it to be ad-free, but those days are apparently finito. The latest update to Windows 11 (KB5036980) comes out this week and includes ads for apps in the "recommended" section of the Start Menu, one of the most oft-used parts of the OS. "The Recommended section of the Start menu will show some Microsoft Store apps," according to the release notes. "These apps come from a small set of curated developers." The app suggestions are enabled by default, but you can restore your previously pristine Windows experience if you've installed the update, fortunately. To do so, go into Settings and select Personalization > Start and switch the "Show recommendations for tips, app promotions and more" toggle to "off."
Install Enterprise/LTSC (Score:1)
Install Enterprise/LTSC and activate with a chinese KMS server or Microsoft Activation Scripts. You're welcome
Re: (Score:2)
They're telling you to pirate it (Score:3)
Yes, it's a site license model where you pay per seat with a rather large minimum number of seats. But the commenter you're replying to is telling you to install it and activate it using illegitimate servers. They're advising people to replace their (presumably OEM-licensed) copy of Windows Home with a pirated installation of Windows Enterprise.
Re: (Score:2)
I installed Linux (Score:2)
I toggled Windows off. I also bought a mac mini.
Re: (Score:2)
Once again (Score:5, Insightful)
This is why I don't use Windows at home.
After W7 I went to Linux and haven't looked back. It's bad enough I have to put up with Microsoft's excuses and incompetence at work, I definitely don't want to deal with that at home.
Re: (Score:3)
I tried for a number of years to convert - too many missing drivers, too many text files to be edited with VI.
That's no longer true, it's equivalent to a Windows install now. If you can handle one, you can handle the other.
Re: (Score:2)
For home use Linux is the way to go for non-developers. But most of those people moved even to a worse system, Cell Phones. The spyware on Cells make Windows look like a locked down NSA System.
With that said, I do not like the direction of Linux these days, I have been evaluating the BSDs for the last few years and I have to choose between 2 variants when I decide to move off Linux.
The enshittification continues (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
It's not new, Windows has pretty much always been like this. The default install of Windows 95 came with a load of crapware and offers for dial-up internet. Which was actually kind of funny, because Windows 95 didn't have a firewall so if you did dial-up, you were pretty much guaranteed to have your machine p0wned within seconds.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What exactly is the appeal to X11, in 2024?
I've not been a serious Linux desktop user for a number of years now, but when I was, Wayland was far more appealing than X11 on every basis: performance, remote desktop capability, overhead, security.
Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:5, Informative)
What exactly is the appeal to X11, in 2024?
My list goes something like this:
** XDMCP still works. Yes, I use it. Often. No, VNC isn't a valid replacement for it (it only ships canvas/bitmaps, not individual applications)
** I don't agree that Wayland is stable. It has not been stable when I try it.
** X11 still appears to be supported by all the chipsets and systems I care about
** Wayland breaks a lot of apps and forces code and library changes on others. This is unwelcome.
** There aren't enough Wayland-friendly apps that can replace what it breaks
** This guy's blog summarizes [tenstral.net] a lot of the problems with porting. He's not bitching about XDMCP (but I sure as hell am).
** I'm tired of the attitudes from the Wayland crowd. Wayland has been around forever and they've barely moved the needle. They and their fans have become obnoxious. Impress us with your performance and elegance, stop talking about it and do it.
Re: (Score:2)
If you need XDMCP then by all means use the software that suits you, but the rest of your points are utter crap. Let's address them:
** You don't agree Wayland is stable? I've never had it crash once. Actually switching to Wayland when X.org was the default in Ubuntu solved a monitor resolution issue I had.
** Wayland supports all chipsets and systems I care about too. What are you are specifically missing? Saying something works as intended isn't a counter claim to something else.
** Wayland breaking apps is
Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:5, Insightful)
*yawn* okay boomer. - Am I obnoxious? Yes, I treat people with the respect they treat others, and this is all the respect you deserve.
So someone has a use-case and experience different than your own, so they and that don't (more/any) deserve respect? He didn't disparage you or your use-case, merely stated his experiences. Your statement above says a lot about you, and it's not great. Not sure why you care so much about X11 vs Wayland, but you need to let it go and realize that everyone has different needs, and comfort levels, and they're not (necessarily) good/bad, better/worse, but mainly just different. In short, grow up.
Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
The overwhelming majority of apps don't care what system you run them on.
That is true. Xlib and other libraries are, in fact, well implemented on Wayland. That's one of the things that's frustrating, it's been "almost there" for a long time. MOTIF runs fine under Wayland for example. I've got a few MOTIF apps that I compiled just to test and I have no problems with those.
*yawn* okay boomer. - Am I obnoxious?
Well, that's part of your personality when defensive. You have your moments. BTW, I'm Gen-X, not a Boomer. I think you are mistaking me for some kind of anti-Wayland zealot (and there are such). Wayland isn't badly designed, a Trojan horse, or some kind of anti-Unix taint ala System==D written by a Microsoft guy with a lot of terrible ideas and methods. It's nowhere near that nasty or untenable and represents a legitimate effort at cleaning up the display server landscape that's been admittedly cluttered a long time. So, I'd definitely put it in a different class than System==D, which is already showing a lot of strain (too many security problems for my taste on top of a terrible terrible design). I am just a little put off by the complete fuck-you attitude toward XDMCP from Wayland fanbois rather than just saying "It's hard. It's old. We'll get to it eventually in a module and if someone can help, great" as some have done. Instead I get the "You actually don't need that" from clueless children who couldn't even tell me what XDMCP does way too much (not saying from you, but it's happened).
Re: (Score:2)
So don't use VNC, use RDP. It works better than XDMCP ever did.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:4, Interesting)
I use Linux servers all the time, but not the desktop. I'm not terribly familiar with Wayland. But I'm curious about what you say about "remote desktop capability". IMHO, that was the one *huge* benefit of X11. Remote capability was granular down to the window. Every X11 program was capable of putting its display on a remote machine. You didn't have to export the whole desktop, and you didn't end up with an add-on program (a la VNC) that just bit-copied the whole screen elsewhere. Remote displays were a first-class feature of X. Some lab equipment, like logic analyzers and oscilloscopes even supported X giving a simple way to interact with the device directly from your computer. It was OS-agnostic, too, and you could get X servers for Linux, Windows, Mac, Solaris, and pretty much anything else that had aspirations of being a desktop OS.
As I said, I'm not too familiar with Wayland. The Wayland FAQ [freedesktop.org] suggests that you need add-on programs for remote support, and I think then you only get full desktop replication. Am I reading that correctly?
X had its share of shortcomings and was showing its age even 20 years ago when I last used it in earnest. But I *loved* this particular feature and I sorely miss it today.
Re: (Score:2)
Remote XDMCP has always been very latency sensitive (IIRC) and requires a lot of other bits in place before you can use it: firewalling, secure tunnels. That includes a remote X server (client). The interactivity and interoperability is poor on anything but local networks, and was unusable on broadband connectivity the last time I tried using it 15 odd years ago.
The benchmark here is RDP, and has been for at least 20 years. At least with RDP on Windows, it's quite straightforward (or at least used to be). A
Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:5, Insightful)
It's good that the open source community offers so many options that everyone can find their favorite. But still, the level of zealotry in the community is so strong it is comical.
I am using Ubuntu. System D has never harmed me. The corporate backing of Ubuntu has never harmed me. It has "just worked" better than the other distros I have tried (Suse long ago, and Fedora slightly less long ago), does everything I want it to do, runs Steam and plays steam games just fine, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
SystemD indirectly harmed me. Had a bunch of 'buntu desktops that the users weren't very careful with. Unclean shutdowns were the norm. Upgraded to whatever the systemd enforced version was. Figured there was no harm since it was as vanilla as could be, who cares what the init system is? Well within a couple of days I was trying to lead remote users through running fsck from the emergency shell because someone at canonical thought a generic recovery shell on any pre-boot error was a good idea. For all syste
Re: (Score:2)
Wayland may be technically superior but the maintainers seem less inclined to solve problems people have and chase ideals they have.
A common complaint which completely misses the point. The ideals exist to prevent Wayland turning into X11. A lot of the things given the WONTFIX treatment are precisely the things that architecturally were intended to be omitted from the compositor.
Re: (Score:1)
The stuff that goes on in Linux land is the reason why I now use FreeBSD. I had used Linux daily, on the desktop from 1997 till 2020.
Re: (Score:2)
I did a preliminary dive into whatever bsd Digital Ocean had... my takeaway was that it would probably make a good file server but I didn't want to take the time to learn the firewall
Then on the desktop, I didnt' want to take time to learn the package manager.. so tha
Re: (Score:2)
I'm rather invested in iptables
I get it. In Linux I have had to learn ipfwadm, ipchains, iptables, and now nft. One of the reasons why I like BSD is that all the network filters share the 99% of syntax with Darren Reed's old 'ipfilter' which includes PF and NPF. I personally think the expressions in PF and it's clones are the most readable and easiest to write. However, again, I get it, it's all about what you're most used to.
I didnt' want to take time to learn the package manager.
The CLI package management tool 'pkg' has very easy syntax (basically like Apt in Debian/Devuan). I wouldn't let
Re: (Score:2)
I'm downloading the xfce version of Ghost, right now. I'll install it in a vbox and have a look around.. and have a look at the Handbook.
Much appreciated... you may be hearing from me again
Re: (Score:2)
Learning PF is key, obviously, for servers.
One thing I noticed when I started learning PF/ipfilter/NPF syntax is that it's a completely different paradigm. In Linux, you run command line tools like iptables and the CLI tool has arguments for all the various network features. So, this is nice because you can make a script with all those flags etc... However, it's also got a bit of a downside because the readability of those rules suffers due to the mechanics of using getopt() style f
Re: (Score:2)
There's no way to use the gui without understanding at least some of the protocols.. so forget it.
Loooong time ago when starting on the security road, I tried Wireshark.. thinking "this will be easy".
I'll let you catch your breath from laughing.
apt install tcpdump, man tcpdump... gets you more, faster.
Coming from application programming, where you can just build anything you don't really understand,
I found the networking world super confu
Re: (Score:2)
So I installed ghost with xfce in a vbox. That bit of user friendliness helps quite a bit to be able to see a few familiar programs and try it a bit.
Found most of my usual linux programs
I gather if you want to compile from source, you can have nearly anything on that runs on linux (?)
(pkg management is not one of my specia
Re: (Score:2)
the display driver only goes to 1024... but I have link to some promising instructions to get higher resolution inside the vbox
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/virtualbox-resolutions-missing-ii.77117/
this feels very familiar so far most of the commands I typed in were same as in linux... pretty good. I gather I could install bash...
so.... I think I'm sitting with the cool kids now...
In terms of a desktop for office work.. see
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty surprised in two areas though. I thought it would b
Re: (Score:2)
Ugh. I Hope I can install no-csd
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't use Gnome for reasons... and resent that stuff showing up where it's not wanted.
Re: (Score:2)
The best solution I've seen to the dilemma is with Fluxbox who has a "ToggleDecor" feature yo
Re:Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
No consumer should ever have to give one second's thought to Wayland or SystemD. Nor to KDE, Gnome, X11... all this technical blather is straight up in the way and stupid. If I want to run a DAW, I shouldn't be concerned with ALSA/JACK. Having to know anything about any of this is a barrier to entry.
Until that shit fades into the background, desktop linux is doomed to single digits. And rightly so.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh for sure. There are people that want particular things, and care about those tools. I'm one of them. Yeah, my complaint is that one of the barriers to adoption is a mental perception of complexity.
Well... not just "mental". Mostly mental, though. When it comes to day to day use, most people simply wouldn't need to know anything about SystemD. The idea that they might have to is destructive to the cause.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why are you assuming this about me? I've run Linux servers for two decades. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, there's no distro that will do that for you. There's too many standards [xkcd.com], and there will always be the person that boldly types: "Yes, do as I say!" and blow up everything despite the warnings [reddit.com].
Fixing that problem would require a distro to either consolidate around ONE desktop manager and design everything around it. Or build their own. The closest we've ever gotten on that front is something like the old Mandriva Control Center, which tried
Re: (Score:2)
You know, I'm used to people pushing their own internal conflicts into their assumptions about me on the internet. It's what we do. But that was breathtaking. :)
I've been using DAWs since 1997, and I have a very nice one today. I fought the Alsa/jack battle back in the day on Linux. That's why I mentioned it.
Don't assume so much. My post was about consumers in general. I am as technical as they come.
Re: Too bad Wayland ruined Linux (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Since its a leap forward and away from long used X11, it does have problems, but it'll surely get better and hopefully better than X11 ever could.
Just like the switch to WebExtensions for Firefox: while it reduced the choice of extensions (and many can't still be ported), gone are the days of extensions breaking with each Firefox version, installing or updating an extension requiring restarting Firefox or even one tab crashing or freezing both all Firefox tabs and its interface.
Windows start menu (Score:1)
Windows 11 start menu was ad/spam ridden from day one.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't use it enough, but they had to overflow the ads into cortana didn't they?
Whenever someone says "curated" watch out! (Score:1)
"These apps come from a small set of curated developers." In other words, developers who are willing to pay for the ad space.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it really that oft used? (Score:2)
It's pretty rare I open the start menu for anything.
"Users' colons must now stay internet-connected." (Score:3)
I'm convinced that for the past couple decades Microsoft has been secretly run by someone who made a bad deal with a genie, ended up cursed, and is purposely trying to tank the company to get out of it. But nothing they're trying is working as it should, and they sweat as they look at the marketing research.
"Come on! Come ON! They're buying Vista? VISTA?! My God, what else can I even DO?"
Just an other reason to use Linux (Score:4, Interesting)
Come on, how hard can they insist you never it? (Score:3)
Go and grab a professional Operating System like Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Solaris, FreeBSD, or several others and install them, what do you notice? What you'll notice is that bloat, and the crap, are gone. When I open the application's selector in Gnome 46 on Fedora 40, what don't I see? I don't see Ads, I don't see links to download applications with privacy abuse records that make North Korea smile, I just don't see garbage. I might see LibreOffice installed, I'll see some default applications that range from good to “why, I guess.”, but I don't see useless, pointless, nonsense crap.
To paraphrase another quote I say often: “Windows is for people who pretend to do work, Linux / Unix are for people who have to get work done.” Microsoft keeps position Windows as the OS for laughs and to be discredited, and it's discredited, it's one step away from door knocking to explain it's a child predator (and it is a predator of children).
The Price to Turn off Ads (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Any bets on how much MS will charge to turn ads off? $50 a year? $200 a year? Will it be a tiered system in which you pay more and more money to have MS analyze less and less of your data?
You didn't read the whole summary. It was one fucking paragraph and you couldn't even manage that.
Re: The Price to Turn off Ads (Score:2)
Re:The Price to Turn off Ads (Score:4, Insightful)
Whatever. TFS, the summary, tells you how to turn it off. Nobody with an ounce of intelligence lives with ads in Windows 11.
Excepting maybe the start page on the Settings app. That has ads for OneDrive, Office365, and Copilot. Know what I do with those? I ignore them and get my shit done. Hell, I have to scroll the page to see Office365 and Copilot. And the OneDrive ad just tells you your cloud storage isn't working.
Does everyone have ADHD or something? Do you have tardive dyskinesia and suddenly jerk the mousewheel? Just ignore ads.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
i do appreciate linux users who are perfectly fine with hours of text configs and bash prompts to get their system "just right" could not be assed to find and toggle one setting
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Whatever. TFS, the summary, tells you how to turn it off. Nobody with an ounce of intelligence lives with ads in Windows 11.
Umm... how long do you think the ability to turn it off will be available? This is Microsoft putting their toes in the water. They learned from Palladium that you can't just wholeheartedly force such evilness upon people. You have to do it slowly.
Now, every computer has Palladium but Microsoft lost a key part of it: They are not the sole entity allowed to specify the certificates. They will not make the same mistake with the ads. The money is too important.
Re: (Score:2)
Whatever. TFS, the summary, tells you how to turn it off. Nobody with an ounce of intelligence lives with ads in Windows 11.
That is until MS changes that in the next update. The setting might be moved to an obscure area or a Registry key setting. Given the history of how MS has pushed Windows 11, I think this is likely.
I have Windows 10 Pro and when Windows 11 came out, I had to opt out of an automatic upgrade once. Somewhere along the way, MS changed the behavior of Windows Update. Automatic updates used to be for security and critical updates. MS started adding "Feature Updates" that did things like install Edge as your prima
Re: (Score:2)
HOWEVER, we're seeing this in the EU right now with Facebook. Fwict, Facebook, because of new EU regs, is offering people this deal: pay 250EUR or you get advertisments. Again, my assumption is that 250EUR is approx break even point for FB advertising...
I don't use FB and don't even like them, but to be fair there are expenses to providing services.
Well, at least (Score:3)
"switch the "Show recommendations for tips, app promotions and more" toggle to "off."" - well, at last until M$ turns it back on whenever they feel the need to do so, or worse yet, removes the option. Switch to a different OS people, it's the only option that can't be manipulated by M$.
IT guy from years back (Score:1)
What is this ignorant bullshit (Score:5, Informative)
No Windows 11 does not "now" come with adware. That feature is old. It predates Windows 11 itself. Even Windows 10 was putting recommended apps (ads) in the start menu. And the toggle to turn it off and on dates from Windows 10 and was brought over in Windows 11.
I can't wait for the writer to go outside when it's raining and declare "after 40 years in journalism I just discovered water makes things wet!"
New theory (Score:2)
They want people to leave windows, and they're desperate for people leaving windows. This is why they're doing everything in their power to make windows as terrible as possible.
Re: (Score:3)
I Wonder How Much These Ads Cost (Score:2)
Adventure (Score:2)
And I thought "oh, a Windows-native version of Adventure [wikipedia.org] would be neat to try out." Then my brain caught up with my eyes and was disappointed. I'd much rather have Adventure than Adware.
We blighters in the trenches at home ... (Score:2)
... look for the "disable" solution and move on. The article tells us how to shitcan this feature. That's what we did with copilot and all the other bullshit since Windows became viable back when Moby Dick was a minnow.
How disgusting (Score:2)
But in line with their overall product quality and respect for their users.
Not again! Security hole just waiting... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Only a decade ago? I switched long before that. I will gladly pay the Apple tax to avoid Windows.
The same ads as Windows 10 (Score:2)