Brilliant! That's exactly what they should do, without argument!

They clearly added Rust as an agenda, rather than a feature add. When do you ever see them list the languages used for release? "We decreased the C++ X from 0.001ms to 0.0009ms", you never see that. Why point out Rust? Regardless what I think about the claims of Rust, since it's not relevant, why point out you used it at all? If they always included the languages used and notes about why the languages were used, and what they're doing, that's fine. Do they do that normally, and I'm just clueless? I don't remember seeing that ever.

The “Pay Gap” doesn't exist as systemic, universal discrimination metric, we have decades of research that show that. It's a feminist fever dream, that they have to hold because so many of their arguments have failed, are irrelevant, or don't work.

Yep, good on Cloudflare, DNS is not the right or appropriate protocol to use for blocking access to sites. They're in my opinion, handling this correctly, using a CDN. Hopefully, if this is appealed they don't screw it up.

That's the best line in the post, a powerful notebook could easily run $2500 CAD+ with prices easily climbing through $5k for a workstation geared computer. Assuming they aren't just talking about the standard e-waste notebook companies hand out, that is a good-added deal.

There's more than one, and you don't have to argue anything, I'm willing to walk away, there's nothing really useful to say anymore.

I'll even grant all photos are AI generated, it doesn't change the overall point. It's the association with the bills, together they form a picture that he really doesn't want. Even if I just ignore Epstein, and all his buddies, so that entire mess never happened, the bills alone are bad enough to label him. Let's not hold up on the point if they're AI generated, or AI altered, I can grant that, and it doesn't change anything, really. I'll quote the original point I made, in two parts:

Part A:

Part B:

The entire point of that was to mention he's doing the opposite of keeping kids safe, and collecting data he should be trying to distance from. In a very rough overview, and I'm not a lawyer or legal professional, but I do watch legal review, Carney is trying to legislate CSAM collection, why? C-8, C-22, C34, and C-36, they don't require Epstein for Carney to be guilty of what I'm calling him out on. I don't believe all the photos are AI generated or AI altered, I think I've clear on that, but either way, he's still in a world of trouble from what his party is doing. That's not false information, I've listed the four extremely problematic bills, so if the RCMP is going to make posts on Social Media about keeping kids safe, why are they not calling out the Liberals?

You can look these up on DuckDuckGo, Google or any search engine, do you think every photo was AI generated or AI altered? If we're going to start baselessly dismissing photos as AI X, then everyone, in every photo they don't like, is just an AI fever dream. My point to why we can believe the pictures, look at the bills, he's not trying to protect children, he's trying to violently digitally molest them, and collect CSAM, why? I listed the bills C-34, C-36, C-8, and C-22, all a means to collect and abuse, and importantly, not just abuse adults, abuse children, his favourite pass time. I also mentioned C-9, but that doesn't apply for this, it's just an idiotic far-left bill.

I'm in Ontario, Canada.

I think Flock is accountable here, they built an AI that gives unwarranted trust. If Flock is really innocent, lets open Flock to everyone, and let anyone use it's massive cache, since it's recording the people, and the people control the government; therefore, people should have access to what Flock captures. I think Flock should be flipped, let it record the government, and government employees, and let the people monitor it, to make sure our tax dollars aren't being wasted.

What did I lie about? Carney is in photos with Epstein, that's a fact. Carney, and his government are trying to pass bills to force the collection of sensitive data, again, fact. His party is trying to collect / monitor child exploitive material under the hand waving lip service of keeping children safe. Those are covered under Bill C-34 and Bill C-36. Among other terrible bills they've tabled we have:

C8 — Lets spy and digitally molest our citizens
C9 — Lets incorrectly define hate speech, and making mental illness a core protected right
C22 — Lets create a federally sponsored police monitoring regime with secret gag orders

These are not bill that innocent people get involved with, in fact, an innocent person would write strong protections and security standards to prevent any collection, not green-light it. You can find lawyers covering these bills, look up the Canadian Constitution Foundation on YouTube, and other takes, but these are covered.

Unlikely, every problematic photo can't become AI generated just because it exposes a CSAM enthusiast. Carney and his parties action speak for themselves, no one whose not into CSAM would try to legislate its collection.

Trump can't blackmail Carney, without Trump admitting his known (which is stupid) guilt, and Carney knows that. Either Trump outs everyone, or, everyone is effectively protected. Carney could easily clear an assumption of guilt, which I stated in the previous post, by strengthening cybersecurity and privacy to 11, including a revamping how children's data is handled. Why would an innocent person give themselves more access to children and children's data? Why would anyone want that? I would make it illegal to collect children's data, even accidentally, with substantial fines for the company, and jail time for the executives.

I don't think his hands are as tied as he thinks they are, and let's assume I'm talking out my ass, and have no grasp on economics. I honestly think we'll just disagree on that point too much.

The first point is still accurate, he's in very incriminating photos, and I think we need a full investigation on that. Association does not equate to guilt, but, some associations are extremely problematic. He weakened, or is trying to weaken cybersecurity standards, and privacy standards, which is precisely the wrong move if he wants to clear his name. He should be cranking the security and privacy dial to 11, well, fighting for greater transparency, and auditing of the government, and government staff. Even if we assume he's innocent, which I don't, he hasn't done anything to back up a claim of innocence. Canada should fight for and have the best, as in the absolute best, protections for data, and security on the planet. We should have the strongest possible laws protecting the collection of any data from a child, for any reason. He is trying to, or has, weakened that protection. The government talking about keeping kids safe, and knowing what your kids are up to, really falls flat, when Carney is or is going to make the problem significantly worse.

He claims to, and let's assume that's true. The best way to fight the idiot bully, make him bleed and back off. If Canada cuts all exports, how long could the US really survive? I don't know, but weeks, maybe a month? At some point Trump would have to back down, or there would be serious fallout. You can try to talk to a bully for a while, but at some point you need to hit back, and Carney refuses to do that.

If he played the game better, he would be the bully in the room, not the sissy clothed pride coward. What he should have done was shut off exports to the US, kill them all unless the tariffs drop, and then watching the US burn and Trump backtrack. Canada is smaller than the US, sure, but, the US needs Canada, we have a remarkable bargaining chip, and he won't use it effectively.