Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Death of security (Score 1) 71

How in hell are we going to hold this thing together?

By turning programming into an actual engineering discipline? I dunno. Might be more effective than seat of the pants programming that we encourage now. But wait, yet another language will make it easy to program again.

Lazy and undisciplined. What do you think will happen? Exactly what we are seeing?

Comment Re:robotaxi crashes 4 times rate of human drivers, (Score 1) 124

Tesla's supervised robotaxi fleet currently crashes at roughly four times the rate of human drivers.

I would be interested in knowing where you get that data as every discussion I have seen ends up with someone claiming that autonomous vehicles are MUCH safer than humans (which I find difficult to believe without massaged statistics).

Comment Re: No. (Score 1) 141

You have never lived very far north then. *shrug*

I dislike changing the clocks; however, I understand why someone further north than myself would want to. I have been fortunate in that I have lived half of my life without changing the clocks twice a year. I would like to keep it that way.

Comment Re: It's a scary future (Score 1) 181

The major businesses might disappear over time; however, the families that owned them merely moved their capital into other companies. In other words, it is not about the companies, it is about the families where the wealth is stored. Think of the Kennedy family or the Bush family (mentioned because one destroyed the other)

Comment Re:Life? (Score 1) 197

So, no meat, no liquor, no cooking... just bread, water, and hard work. And we are going to die anyways, despite all of that. Fuck you and your world view. If my lifetime is limited no matter what I do, then I choose Freedom and Liberty over living 5 minutes or 5 years or 5 decades or 5 centuries longer.

Comment Re:Artificial stupidity (Score 1) 133

And yet, statistically, it's a better drive then your average human driver by far. Go figure.

Are they really better drivers than "average" humans? Or are statistics twisted to lie to you? The only advantage that mechanical drivers have is that they do not get sleepy or confused by chemicals, which is truthfully a large advantage, but the lack of situational awareness by the mechanical driver more than compensates for that weakness of humans.

Comment Re:Humans drive into floods, too (Score 1) 133

A decade from now, I have no doubt that the authorities will still have to rescue drivers in flooded roadways. I am also certain that Waymo vehicles will have stopped making that mistake years earlier. We can fix autonomous vehicles. We can't fix humans. I'll take the Waymo, thank you.

Let me get this straight, when less than a single percentage point of people are dumb, all people should trust a provably limited device?

To put it another way, human taxi drivers drive into flooded roads less often than mechanical taxi drivers and it makes sense to trust the mechanical driver?

Or, are you saying that because a tiny percentage of humans are so dumb that they end up driving into floods, that humans as a whole shouldn't drive?

I do not understand your logic here.

Slashdot Top Deals

A memorandum is written not to inform the reader, but to protect the writer. -- Dean Acheson

Working...