Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Sounds pretty crappy. (Score 1) 230

I thought the same thing, though I wonder whether there is evidence linking reduced mania to reduced depression? I know that for some people with (type 1?) bipolar, mitigating manic episodes is a desirable goal. Less mania means less risk-taking and fewer behaviors/symptoms associated with mania. For people with type-2 bipolar, the mania may be more of a reprieve from depression, than a problem.

Comment f.lux & sleep hygiene (Score 5, Informative) 230

I'm guessing most of the Slashdot crowd already knows about f.lux, which I use on my PC's to (attempt to) reduce nighttime exposure to blue light. I don't know how well it does or doesn't work for me, but it helps just as a reminder to unplug an hour or two before my intended bedtime, if possible.

Practicing good sleep hygiene has tangibly improved my sleep and well-being over the past several years, though I noticed results within a week, once I learned and adopted good practices from my sleep doctor. Keeping the right ambient temperature (a surprisingly low 65-70 degrees for me), avoiding light exposure (completely blocked bedroom windows, taped over LED lights, removing all light sources but two red night-lights), getting a truly comfortable mattress, avoiding late meals/snacks/fluid intake, and (more challenging for couples) sleeping alone make the biggest differences for me.

Comment Re:Traffic accident? (Score 1) 62

Confirmed, motorcycle accident (says Eurogamer.net, says Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Leaving aside the potential quagmires of "traffic accident" vs. "motorcycle accident" and the "legendary" characterization, I'm happy take a few seconds to express my condolences and gratitude for his creative contributions, which I've enjoyed without ever prior knowing who to credit.

Comment Duverger's Law: hate the game, not the players (Score 5, Insightful) 338

Blaming the parties may be missing the root cause -- that our archaic plurality voting system eventually fosters a two-party system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

The main problem is that understanding how voting is broken is tougher than coming to terms with climate change or unisex bathrooms. As long as people are content to get into shouting matches over their favorite political grapplers while ignoring that they are actually watching the equivalent of the WWF and not the Olympics, nothing will change.

Comment Re:Academia is willing to protect total dicks (Score 1) 345

First, thank you for your time and reasonable responses, Zero_Kelvin. I appreciate your candor and insights.

"Her work was in theoretical mathematics, on a thesis for which (as she explained to me) this adviser was her only option, at her school. If the work was generic or potentially transferable research, it might make sense that she should be able to simply find another adviser."

Or another school

I noted the "at her school" for this reason. Yes, finding another school was technically an option. However, the difference between "technically" and "practically" is significant. I was never a graduate student, but I know enough about the process to understand that [Boromir] one does not simply pick up and find another school [/Boromir]. The degree of harassment was relevant--it was not a black-and-white matter of violent, physical abuse. This was a real world situation, with all the fuzziness, complexity, and difficult decision-making that goes along with that. It was undoubtedly* harassment, but obviously it was not intolerable for her. I'm sure it crept into their interpersonal dynamic in an insidious fashion, over time, like a slow boil. This is part of the reason that sexual harassment is such a problem, for both the accused and the accusers.

* Undoubtedly to me, based on my familiarity with her as a friend, and on how her story was revealed in bits and pieces, over months/years of our casual conversations. Of course, it would be impractical and difficult to convey this in words, online. My trust in my friend's honesty would never get imparted to a stranger, just as it would be very hard for me to put myself in someone else's shoes in a similar manner.

"Couldn't the university claim that the adviser's offense is not the university's offense?"

No

IANAL, though I suspect you're probably correct. The question was rhetorical, intended to illustrate some of the uncertainty we faced. It's easy to simply say "No", but that is not the same as seeking answers from a qualified lawyer or legal advocate. That takes time and energy. For a graduate student who is already lacking both, being further drained by such a negative dynamic, I think it's understandable for them to avoid the stress as much as possible. We may be the kind of proactive people who focus on this kind of problem until it gets solved, but I know others (including my two math friends) sometimes opt to avoid the stress of dealing with confrontation or emotional situations.

" Covert recordings are usually illegal/inadmissable as evidence without a warrant

Sexual harassment is illegal where I am from. I don't know about where you live. If it is indeed illegal there she should talk to a lawyer, who can involve the police and secure a warrant for the recording.

Seeking a warrant to gather evidence is a good idea, if that's actually an option. We didn't think of that, probably because of our unfamiliarity with legal process, and because of the time/energy that would take. However, this is part of why I posted about this, so that others facing a similar situation might have the benefit of such suggestions. Thanks!

Comment Re:Power dynamics in graduate academia (Score 1) 345

I agree that I wish my friends had been endowed with the personality traits and logistical means to champion their own causes. But they weren't, and I can't blame them for that. Not everyone has the character, energy, time, or desire to be an activist. As their friend, there wasn't much I could do for them, other than to offer my support. If I tried taking matters into my own hands, I would have likely been ineffective (since I'm not even a student there), and I could have inadvertently caused major problems for them. It wasn't my decision to make for them.

Taking the time to tell this story is part of my way of trying to bring it to light, in a public forum. Perhaps someone can suggest some specific, helpful ways this type of problem could be addressed in the future, so that others can do something about it, if they find themselves in a similar situation. My friends and I gave this considerable thought, and we didn't think or or find anything that would let them handle the situation without potentially causing major problems for them.

Comment Re:Academia is willing to protect total dicks (Score 1) 345

Her work was in theoretical mathematics, on a thesis for which (as she explained to me) this adviser was her only option, at her school. If the work was generic or potentially transferable research, it might make sense that she should be able to simply find another adviser. It's something both of my friends would have certainly done, if that were an option. I think once one gets to that level of material, though, specialization is the rule, and one typically selects an adviser based (in part) on their specialization. You're kind of locked in, then, and become more so with time.

I'm not sure your statement "no university would try to collect on tuition from a student [who] could prove they were being sexually harassed" is viable. Couldn't the university claim that the adviser's offense is not the university's offense? Also, "proving" sexual harassment is easier said than done. Covert recordings are usually illegal/inadmissable as evidence, and overt recording would simply result in the adviser censoring themselves, or not allowing the recording. Even assuming one could obtain legal, indisputable evidence...would you want to put your academic and professional career on pause, in order to take it to court? I know I probably would, but just because I would doesn't mean others would.

What surprises me here is all the vitriol and hostility being directed against my account of my friend's difficult situation. I don't get the point of it. Why would she make this stuff up, and why would I? Rhetorical questions, of course...I'm fully aware of what Internet anonymity does to discourse.

Comment Re: Academia is willing to protect total dicks (Score 1) 345

I commented about this lower in the thread. Basically, recording covertly isn't really an option (legally), and recording openly would have likely been too confrontational for her and/or too easy for him to raise a fuss about. While undoubtedly an asshole, the adviser is a theoretical mathematician. Literally a smart, calculating villain.

Comment Re:Disappointing choice (Score 2) 345

I thought of this too, which led me to consider/suggest the more reasonable, less dramatic approach of simply doing it the opposite way: give her a voice recorder to use in plain sight, for its traditional purpose of recording notes for later review. The intention was to get him (the adviser) to stop his bad behavior, not to get him in trouble. Once he knew things were being recorded, he would be smart enough to discontinue the unprofessionalism. But realistically, this probably wouldn't work, and she knew it. He'd simply refuse to let her use it in his office or something, and then she'd have to deal with the fallout from the resulting situation.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Users find the one combination of bizarre input values that shuts down the system for days.

Working...