GFY psychopath.
Your "logic" seems to be that if someone else makes more, it's okay to steal from them if you believe you're underprivileged. Since most people are too weak and/or scared to steal, they get someone else to do it for them. Trouble is, it's still immoral to get someone else to steal for you, even if you believe you're somehow entitled to someone else's stuff.
Totally, painfully wrong.
Actually, he's completely and provably quite correct. Your response didn't even make any sense beyond this first, completely ridiculous denial. Whatever point you were trying to make about alternative fuels is lost in your lack of writing ability and poor communication skills. Fossil fuels are factually 96% of what powers transportation globally. Aviation and shipping are close to 100%. Even with cheap nuclear power, creating synfuels has major problems and still would result in more expensive fuels. The technology isn't there yet to make synfuels viable cost-wise, the are not, as you say, commercially viable. If they were they'd already be widespread and popular. Given that right now any synfuel production is likely the result of a government funded study or subsidy, you might want to get your facts straight.
"I have just one word for you, my boy...plastics." - from "The Graduate"