Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:People will die (Score 1) 115

Because it wasn't a foreign military power. You have to look at the time and context these things were deployed in the first place. It was almost immediately after the CEO of a large health insurance company was murdered in the street and Americans from both sides of the aisle were banding together against the current power structure. Then all of a sudden the news cycle shifted to become dominated by unusual aircraft flying over numerous areas of U.S. airspace, including the vicinity of military bases, and operating with complete impunity. The U.S. government claimed they had no idea what they were but also somehow knew that they weren't a threat. It was basically a sky parade to distract the masses from potentially engaging in class warfare and it worked like a charm. Or maybe my tinfoil hat is on too tight, but the U.S. government has plenty of experience creating distractions (usually in foreign countries and usually quite violent), so it's easy to believe that they would do something similar domestically, especially given that this method wouldn't involve violence.

Comment Re:People will die (Score 1, Interesting) 115

The mis-identification of aircraft flying at night as "drones" has become rife, dating back beyond the NY/NJ "drone" incidents that caused such concern in the USA a year or two ago. Almost without exception, these "drones" are real aircraft (often passenger flights) carrying people through the skies.

For two or three weeks during that time, I saw many aircraft in my area that were unlike any others I had ever seen (and I spent most of my life living under the approach route of an international airport). These craft flew way lower and often way slower than other aircraft aside from helicopters. However, unlike helicopters they were virtually silent, which was what amazed me the most about them, especially given their apparent size and close proximity. I'm sure there were many people misidentifying regular jets as drones during that period, but there absolutely were numerous large-scale drones flying around as well.

Comment Macbook TCO Has Skyrocketed (Score 4, Interesting) 43

I bought my first and only Macbook Pro in 2006. Over time, I upgraded the RAM to max it out and I upgraded the disk drive several times as storage prices fell. Due to all of this upgradability, I was able to use this as my primary device for fourteen years until the GPU finally crapped out. While I'd never had any issues with the laptop before the GPU died, it was made up of commodity components that could easily be sourced and replaced by skilled technicians at third-party shops. Due to that, I never felt the need to get AppleCare. It will likely go down as the best laptop I've ever owned.

Contrast that with the current Macbooks which can't upgrade the RAM or storage after purchase. This means that if you want to build a laptop that lasts a long time, you need to pay Apple their extortionate fees upfront for RAM and storage as there is no ability to change your mind later. Most of the components can no longer be sourced by third-parties, so you'd better max out AppleCare as well. And after that expires, if any component dies on the motherboard, even a $5 IC or capacitor, your only option is to pay Apple $800-$1500 for a refurbished board since they refuse to replace individual components on the board. And if you maxed out the RAM and storage to future-proof your machine, you'll be paying the upper end of that price range. Also, depending on the component that dies, you may lose all of your data in the process. And that's only if Apple doesn't refuse to service the laptop in the first place. Tally that up, and it's hundreds, maybe well over a thousand, dollars just for future-proofed RAM and storage, hundreds for AppleCare since third-party board repair is virtually impossible, and well over a thousand after that if any component on the board shits the bed after AppleCare expires. Macbooks have essentially become premium disposable laptops.

So while the option to customize your Macbook via build-to-order will certainly alleviate some of the TCO issues that modern Macbooks present, they're still a very far cry from what they were in the mid 2000s and early 2010s. It's a shame because the M-series chips seem pretty great, but I personally can't justify the enormous hike in TCO. But based on their sales numbers, I don't think my priorities mirror the average person and I highly doubt Apple is missing my business.

Comment This Is How It Starts (Score 4, Insightful) 107

First it's KDE's login manager. Next, it will be some other portion of KDE due to another dependency, maybe systemd-homed. And other projects are almost certain to follow. This is Red Hat's version of embrace, extend, extinguish (which is likely a big reason why IBM bought Red Hat). They keep making additional modules that are exclusive to SystemD with enticing functionality, they lure downstream projects to integrate those modules, and before you know it the dependencies are so intertwined with this exclusive functionality that the downstream project can no longer support any other init system. Say what you want about all of the other init systems available, but I can't think of another init system that pulled shit like this. They didn't have to implement SystemD like this, but they chose to because it allowed them to exert undue influence on many other downstream projects (and when you're an init system, almost every component is a downstream project). If you like SystemD, fine, but let's not pretend this outcome is incidental, let alone healthy for alternative init systems.

Comment Small Potatoes (Score 1) 136

Take a look around. People, especially young people, are opting out of: college, career development, marriage, parenthood, relationships, and just about anything else that we once considered valuable as a society. And this Wired author is concerned about the effects of shunning...smartphones. This is like being trapped in a house fire and complaining about a hangnail.

Slashdot Top Deals

A successful [software] tool is one that was used to do something undreamed of by its author. -- S. C. Johnson

Working...