Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Windows needs XBox (Score 3, Insightful) 66

No it isn't. It's API stability. Linux changes stuff all the time, and pretty soon your old binaries won't run on new distros (unless, ironically, you're running Windows software with WINE). Apple deprecates APIs all the time and switches CPU every few years. For all its other faults, Windows is still better at keeping your software usable.

Comment Re:agreed to use the term "super intelligence" (Score 2, Informative) 177

The regime is imploding while Trump literally just sits back and enjoys the show.

But it isn't. The US attack has bolstered public opinion for them, and ensured there's a new generation of Persians growing up to hate the US. It's funny how you complain about people supposedly hating you, then proceed to give them very good reasons to hate you.

Comment Re:As a person who does photography.. (Score 2) 41

It depends on focal length as well as f-stop (shorter focal length gives more depth of field at the same f-stop). Smaller sensors need shorter focal lengths for the same field of view, so a "50mm equivalent field of view" f/2.8 lens for a smaller sensor will have more depth of field than a "50mm equivalent field of view" f/2.8 lens for a larger sensor.

Comment Re:I remember anti-drug ads in the 80's (Score 1) 30

The implication is that the "pusher" sells heavily-discounted drugs to the kids, or gives them free samples, to get them addicted. Then they need to steal money to buy more drugs to feed their habit. I'm not sure this was ever a real thing, but that's the narrative the ads were playing on.

Comment Re: maybe it was... (Score 1) 90

Why? What evidence is there to support that? Or lacking evidence, even a proposed biological mechanism by which harm could be caused by non-ionising radiation?

I'm not a biologist or oncologist, but here in Australia, it's well-known that prolonged exposure to non-ionising UV radiation as a significant contributing factor to developing melanoma and other skin cancers. I'm not saying mobile phones necessarily cause cancer, just pointing out that there are mechanisms by which non-ionising radiation is known to cause cancer. Simply being non-ionising dosn't mean prolonged exposure is safe.

Slashdot Top Deals

May the bluebird of happiness twiddle your bits.

Working...