Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:In which 3rd world country can we store the was (Score 1) 82

Cooled EGR is not an either-or to DEF. You can have both.

That's even more weight, space, and complexity that no-one wants. It's hard enough fitting the EGR cooler for 4,500hp loco in the loading gauge. And the reason they went with EGR in the first place is because they don't want to deal with the logistics of supplying loco fleets with DEF. Using EGR and DEF would completely defeat the purpose.

Comment Re:In which 3rd world country can we store the was (Score 1) 82

DEF systems on heavy vehicles work, but they're fairly, well, heavy. Among other thing, they use electrical heat to get up to operating temperature. Then there's the issue of needing the fluid. For earthmoving equipment and railway locos, they'd rather not deal with that and have gone with complex EGR systems with liquid cooling instead.

Comment Re:In which 3rd world country can we store the was (Score 2) 82

The cost though... They did it thinking it would be cheap, and it turned out to be the opposite.

I'm not sure this is really true. They sold it to the public as being cheap, but de Gaulle was absolutely adamant that France needed independent nuclear deterrent capability, because he didn't fully trust the USA. A domestic nuclear industry was a prerequisite for that. So they were probably lying about the cost to make it more palatable to the public all along.

The economics for reprocessing only work if you put an arbitrarily high value on plutonium. In the early days, when countries were building up nuclear weapons stockpiles, this sort of made sense. The nuclear weapons organisations bought plutonium from fuel reprocessing for high prices, and the UK was even selling plutonium to the USA. But now there's more plutonium floating around than anyone really needs, so reprocessing isn't cost-effective. But you don't want to completely dismantle the capability in case you need it for a future arms race, or for maintaining your stockpile.

And then they screwed up their environmental goals by promoting diesel cars, again not knowing that they were so bad when the decision was made.

Diesel cars are still better than petrol cars on every metric besides NOx. The focus was on reducing CO, unburnt hydrocarbons, and then CO2. Diesels are better on all those counts. But NOx eventually became a huge problem, particularly with the way VW, BMW, etc. cheated on emissions.

Comment Murdoch is a US citizen (Score 3, Informative) 54

Murdoch became a US citizen four decades ago (in 1985) so he could expand his media presence in the US. He's been one of you since long before this site existed. The most recent iteration of the media conglomerate News Corporation (since 2004) was incorporated in Delaware with headquarters in New York, with the US media assets becoming 21st Century Fox in 2013 (the Australian media assets were spun off as News Corp, but they don't have significant US presence). You can't complain about Fox being "foreign" at this point.

Comment Re:The papers suggest ARC could produce more energ (Score 0) 89

It's more just a case of Rei frequently talking about things she only has the most superficial knowledge of as though she's an expert, then somehow getting multiple comments modded up, presumably because people trust the confidence. But it's just Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

Slashdot Top Deals

If a thing's worth doing, it is worth doing badly. -- G.K. Chesterton

Working...