Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Why Windows and Outlook? (Score 1) 136

They were probably given WIndows and Outlook because of cost cuts. This still baffles me, because Microsoft isn't exactly known for providing stable software and there's software readily available which is waaaay more stable than Windows and Outlook which also happens to be absolutely FREE and they could easily audit the source code.

Comment Re:I get that they don't like MS office (Score 1) 77

It's riddled with ways to make it difficult for others to contribute. There's comments in Russian (ok, originally Russian project, so to be expected), obfuscated code (not nice), and binary blobs in there.

OnlyOffice doesn't want people forking their project or even contributing to it. That being said, OnlyOffice is a commercial company, maintaining the project under the same name. They are allowed to do whatever they want to it.

That being said, when a fork happens, it's tough for them. Soon they'll face competition and they can't do anything about it.

Comment Re:Mars still a better choice (Score 1) 73

Thing with taking humans to Mars is that these humans need to be confined in a small space for quite a while. Messages to Earth take longer and longer, so that takes phoning home on a whim out of the picture. On top of that, vacuum packed food even has a certain amount of time it can be kept. Also, drinking your own pee is not particularly a nice prospect, but a requirement on such missions.

What if there's a mechanical problem somewhere? Sorry, you can't quickly ask for a replacement part from Earth, and you still need to poop and piss. So you need to carry all of those parts along as well. Don't forget about the human body deteriorating in various ways, simply because there's almost no gravity.

No, Mars is totally not feasible at the moment, simply because it'd take too long to get there. Having a moon-base would make it more doable, as it becomes quite a lot easier to build a massive ship to accommodate three couples, so they won't go insane and murder each other, have enough spare parts, and have enough food stuffs to reach Mars and go home again. What you'd need to get there would need to be massive, and something of that size simply can't be launched from Earth, but it can be constructed a lot cheaper in orbit of the Moon.

Comment Sane minds prevail (Score 1) 96

When creating art, there should be human involvement to at least some degree. There should be some effort; at least an attempt at some creativity.

If there's no human involvement in the work, then there's no creativity involved. And no, telling an AI to do something for you is not doing something yourself.

Comment The EU is waking up (Score 3, Insightful) 81

After decades of allowing the USA to shaft our IT industry we finally start looking inward at what remains of our tech industry because uncle Sam becomes a greedy, selfish megalomaniac and now google acts all butt-hurt?

There are loads of companies in the EU providing what Google, Microsoft, and Amazon could provide.

But, alas, these companies are based in the USA and so can only be considered untrustworthy (because of the CLOUD act, for example).

SuSE gmbh (German) provides an entire operating system; both for desktop and server, and they are able to provide SLA arrangements.
SoftMaker (German) provides a nice office package.
Proton (Swiss, soon to be German) provides a bunch of security related services, email, word processor, and a spreadsheet.
NextCloud (German) provides a nice cloud platform, including meeting place and office software.
ONLYOffice (Latvia) provides an office suite which has collaboration features.
Linux Mint (Ireland) is an excellent desktop operating system.
OVH (German) provides cloud infrastructure.

There are others, but these are the companies I can think of this quickly.

So, yes, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, worry as your reputation gets destroyed by the simple fact that you're US companies. All we need to happen is that all those EU governments and large companies wake up (and it's starting to happen) and start pouring money in these EU companies.

Comment LEGO already isn't what it used to be (Score 1) 30

When I was young, there were limited bricks, but the sky was the limit in what you could do with them.

These days I see more and more boxes with bricks in them which can only be used in one particular way.

Now this. They're milking a very good product and making it terrible.

LEGO used to be about creativity; about building whatever pops in your mind. Now, more and more sets can only be used to build exactly one thing... maybe two or three.

Slashdot Top Deals

The "cutting edge" is getting rather dull. -- Andy Purshottam

Working...