When tourist space flight begins, I'll try it...
Displaying poll results.27010 total votes.
Most Votes
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on March 20th, 2024 | 9739 votes
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 8493 votes
Most Comments
- What's the highest dollar price will Bitcoin reach in 2024? Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 68 comments
- Will ByteDance be forced to divest TikTok Posted on February 28th, 2024 | 20 comments
When it gets cheap (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't expect it to be cheap enough for the middle class within my lifetime, however.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:3)
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
10s of thousands of dollars would be enough for the middle class to save up. For one grand trip if they so desire. Granted it is rather expensive for the middle class it is obtainable for the middle class who really wants it.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
My price point before wife and kids was 100,000. I would have begged borrowed stole to get the cash to do the trip at that. Now that I have wife and kids It'd have to be in the 10-20k range, as that's about all I could force out of the budget without putting much of a hardship on us. (basically new car range, and hardship meaning fewer luxuries)
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
Bounds on launch costs:
LEO is ~7800m/s^2 and ~400km, give or take. That's about 30MJ per kg, or about 8.5 kWh per kg. With a base industrial-rate energy cost of $0.06/kWh, a 80-kg adult with 100% launch efficiency and energy as 100% of the cost is about $40*. So barring some radical energy breakthrough**, that's our lower bound.
* -- This assumes no energy recovery on return.
** -- One could argue this either way -- either that increasingly scarce energy supplies or regulation will drive the price up, or that advances in generation technology (fusion, solar, wind, etc) will drop it down. I think holding steady is the safest bet.
Now let's make it more practical. A space elevator only has a couple percent transmission efficiency, but a launch loop or similar could get 50% efficiency. Let's say we have large enough scale and reuse that 80% of the launch costs are energy -- a tough challenge, especially when you consider reentry, but possible. The mass of the craft around a person and the short-term consumables needed for their survival is generally *way* higher than the mass of the people, but let's say that with scale it can get down to about 2x the per-passenger mass (so mass *= 3). This puts our extremely difficult but achievable per-passenger launch cost -- again, assuming energy costs hold steady at $0.06/kWh -- at about $300 per person. So after risk (aka, insurance), profit, taxes, etc, probably about $1000 per passenger.
Now, the picture changes radically if you can do energy recovery on return -- say, landing atop a launch loop and re-accelerating the loop. That not only reduces your reentry requirements, but cuts your energy costs in half after losses. Assuming all else is equal, that would reduce your raw costs to about $150 and your ticket price to $500.
So yeah, it's technically possible to make launches at middle-class-affordable prices. Just don't hold your breath. ;)
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
Sure, it might get down to $20-30 million by our lifetime
Actually, Virgin Galactic [virgingalactic.com] already sells tickets for 200,000$.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
Until you can tour space without weeks or months of training, until it is as easy as stepping onto a plane or boat(which require a 2-3 minute and 15-minute safety lecture respectively) the costs will be prohibitively expensive,
Until we have the ability to negate or absorb the gravitational force (ie Star Trek's Inertia Dampers [wikipedia.org]) not only will it not be practical but unsafe. There are too many people that have unknown or undiscovered ailments and all it would take is a weak blood vessel in the brain to end the trip on a bad note. Training would likely weed out some of the issues but not always.
Do you mean at high acceleration? You can get to orbit and back pulling at most 3G, which is not much more than you will experience in an aircraft.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:3, Interesting)
The way things are going, there won't be a middle class any more within our lifetimes.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
So sayeth the new born babe.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
This, anyone who voted for the first 5 options has to be super-rich. So that's 16% of Slashdot right now, impressive.
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:3)
This, anyone who voted for the first 5 options has to be super-rich. So that's 16% of Slashdot right now, impressive.
That goes for the last option too - at least rich enough to have adopted children.
Mod parent funny (Score:2)
Re:When it gets cheap (Score:2)
It's a matter of priorities. How many people here would be willing to give up home ownership for a ticket? Right now a ticket would cost about 2/3 of what houses around here go for. Chances are that if those folks invested the difference between rent and a mortgage that they could relatively easily get the money by the time the price drops to five figures.
ok, start the missing option gripes... (Score:3)
- I'm voting from space now, you insensitive clod!
- I'll wait, but I'll send my wife up as soon as possible.
- There's a universe in all of us...
- "when" tourise space flight begins? It's already started!
- can we send Cowboy Neal up first?
Re:ok, start the missing option gripes... (Score:2)
Missing option ---I'll go if I don't have to go through the TSA Pornoscanners
Re:ok, start the missing option gripes... (Score:2)
- I'll wait, but I'll send my wife up as soon as possible.
Thank you Mr. Youngman.
Re:ok, start the missing option gripes... (Score:2)
Re:ok, start the missing option gripes... (Score:2)
Re:Missing Option (Score:3)
- can I have a job as a space stewardess, please?
You'll have to shave your chest first...
May be harmful to your mental health.... (Score:2)
Change it from 'stewardess' to 'flight attendant', and I'll campaign for you.
Don't make it gender-specific, and you'll get more support. ;-)
Never underestimate the 'power of influence' that an overweight greybeard in a Speedo® can have!
Why, it can clear out any public venue in a matter of seconds! ;-)
*hint: picture RMS naked, except for a Speedo® and his katana, dueling Steve Ballmer doing his 'monkey dance', shouting: "Developers!, Developers! Developers!", while attired the same...minus katana, and greybeard...
You'll never be the same. ;-)
Re:ok, start the missing option gripes... (Score:2)
At least that's what I had to do to my car when it started missing...
Probably never (Score:5, Interesting)
I predict space tourism will become like cruises. After the first hour or so, people will discover that space is pretty boring. So the space tourist companies will come up with things for people to do, like zero-gravity gambling, or something equally stupid.
Present: "Hey look! I'm drinking and gambling, but it's on a boat, which makes it super special."
Future: "Hey look! I'm drinking and gambling, but it's on a low-earth-orbit-capsule, which makes it super special."
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
I am pretty sure that drinking in zero-G will not be an option for a long time, for rather obvious reasons.
I voted "never" because there's no chance in my lifetime that they will open up space flight for cripples and other untermenches.
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
What obvious reasons? It hasn't stopped the Russians.
The main thing that has kept alcohol (mostly) away from the ISS has been the US presence.
There are other nationalities up there. The US has no space vehicles for people at present. They hope that private enterprise will sort this. Maybe one day, but they may not be the corporate types that NASA would prefer.
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
What obvious reasons?
Space sickness. Globs of acidic and ill-smelling puke floating around won't improve business.
Astronauts and cosmonauts have been chosen in part by their resistance to being sick -- or, rather, those who show propensity for that are selected against.
With tourists, you don't have a long selection process, and as any boat or plane steward can tell you, consuming alcohol greatly increases the risk of technicolor yawns.
Thus, I am pretty certain that a space hotel would be drier than a mormon tabernacle, until we can build spinning hotels big enough to maintain a rotational gravity without noticeable Coriolis effects or gravity differentials when standing up and sitting down.
And even so, part of the attraction is likely to be low G, so that's likely all that will be offered for a long time. Sans alcohol.
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
For all I know, alcohol may be a great space sickness cure.
Once space becomes truly open, there will be alcohol there. It would be an ideal way of getting small scale private enterprise going. As soon as someone tries to make a law about it though, then the criminals will get in...
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
Beer and other bubbly drinks are out because burping in space is a bad thing. Without gravity, there's no way to focus the gasses at the top of your stomach so they can exit out the esophagus without taking everything else with it.
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
I voted "never" because there's no chance in my lifetime that they will open up space flight for cripples and other untermenches.
I'm not sure what your disability is, but if you can afford it i'm sure they'll find a way to take your money, especially if you are an early adopter where the amount of money is large and the queue's are short. Once it becomes affordable enough that more people want flights than there are seats and they get to pick and choose who the 'low risk' customers are I'm sure they'll find a way to exclude you though.
Didn't they manage to get Stephen Hawking into one of those freefall flights? He's about as crippled as you can get.
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
After the first hour or so, people will discover that space is pretty boring.
Only if you;re not susceptible to 'motion sickness', I would suspect.
One of NASA's trainers is known as "The Vomit Comet" for a reason.
Just sayin'.....
BTW, I do agree with the concept you stated. :-)
Re:Probably never (Score:2)
For some reason the idea of a pair of breasts knocking together like a Newton's Cradle doesn't really appeal to me. Burlesque, on the other hand, could probably do some pretty entertaining stuff with the tassels.
Sounds tricky to sell twice (Score:2)
Of course it would be an amazing, unique, cool experience that you just have to do if you can, but would it be fun? Think about it. This isn't something you do for enjoyment. You do it for bragging rights, "experience points," a nice view, etc but otherwise it's something you endure. Space tourism would be more like mountain climbing than "tourism" as we normally think of that word.
If it gets cheap, of course there would be a lot of customers, but they'll get one-time customers. Once you have the bragging rights, then you'll never have to go through that shit again. But that means it can never get cheap. Chicken, meet egg.
Re:Sounds tricky to sell twice (Score:2)
People go mountain climbing more than once too. As for fun, I don't enjoy flying to my destination but being there, living it and seeing it always makes the trip worthwhile. I think space travel would be the same way if the opportunity presents itself in my lifetime, I would "endure" the trip for the destination.
Re:Sounds tricky to sell twice (Score:3)
Endure the trip? What's there to "endure" about blasting out (via whatever method) of the atmosphere, watching the sky fade to black, the world sprawl out beneath you, the continents span across the horizon, etc? And then a firey return -- no adrenaline there? The only time you might get bored is *in* the destination if there's not enough to do ;) Zero-G itself will only keep you entertained for so long.
Re:Sounds tricky to sell twice (Score:2)
I should hope it eventually shifts from "space tourism" to "get across the world in 2 hours".
Re:Sounds tricky to sell twice (Score:2)
And you know this how? When was the last time you went on a space trip?
I can easily imagine two things that would a space trip very much fun. First, If I get a good adrenaline kick out of it, that alone would make it worth the money. Kinda like bungee jumping. Secondly, people who've actually been up there (you know, real astronauts) consistently say that seeing Earth from orbit is one of the most beautiful sights out there. Also worth the money, IHMO. You put that down as a nice view, but I love seeing pictures of this blue marble from outer space. Seeing the real thing would be very gratifying for me.
Re:Sounds tricky to sell twice (Score:2)
If they build a casino in space (with blackjack and hookers etc) then they might find they can secure repeat business. Then it becomes a journey as well as a destination.
Not for most of us (Score:2)
Commercial space flight will almost assuredly never be available to most of us, especially considering the trajectory of our social stratification. With the current income inequality only getting worse, space flight will remain a pipe dream even for the upper middle class. It'll be a toy for the super rich until humanity collapses. Our sci-fi dreams of human society stretching out across the stars will be stopped dead by the laws of physics--and human greed.
Short term thinking (Score:3)
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
when you need feedback to do your next move, it becomes 1.2s which makes a trivial few minute job a non-trivial waiting hell of several hours.
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
Doesn't change the fact that it's a heck of a lot cheaper to boost a robot into orbit that you will dispose of at the end of service life than a fragile ape in an armored suit. (that you have to return to earth, worry about long term health risks, train an excessive amount of time for the task, and quadruple check every piece of equipment used)
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
wasn't arguing otherwise.
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
k. Same thing goes for exploring Mars. While a geologist on the ground might be able to get a lot down walking around and picking up rocks, we could send 1000+ probes to Mars and explore 1000+ locations in parallel for approximately the same cost as a manned mission there and back.
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
and again wasn't saying otherwise :)
However mars is in the sense easier because you know roughly what's needed, and when unexpected happens and AI can't cope you can just put the rovers on hold waiting for instructions/software update.
Repairing a space station is way more complicated than collecting samples from sand or rocks, capturing pictures, and traveling days on end on roughly predetermined path.
Until AI becomes vastly better than it is today, and AI development easier & faster, doing very complex things isn't just feasible automatically, such as visually determining faulty component and fault type, and the repair actions needed. That kind of thing might take quite a bit of effort from a highly skilled human, and the latency will hinder.
Still cheaper than sending the same engineer up currently tho :) But some things are still likely going to require fast hand eye coordination, or very delicate hand eye coordination along with flexibility. That's why we send people up :)
Re:Short term thinking (Score:2)
What makes you think there'll be a middle class in fifty years? Most trends suggest that the last century was something of a blip and we're going back to feudalistic normality.
Re:Not for most of us (Score:2)
...exactly like people in every single generation before this have predicted the fall of civilization and the uselessness of that generation's innovations.
The Joys Of Being A Late Adopter (Score:2)
I picked " as soon as it gets real cheap".
Some of the joys of being a late adopter:
1. You feel smug knowing that other people subsidized the development of your experience/product with THEIR money.
2. You get the enjoyment and support of a well established product or service.
3. You avoid the embarrassment of admitting something like "Yes.., I paid 5 thousand dollars for a computer running on a 386 Chip and Windows 3.0 "
4. You save gobs of money. Enough to have a nice dinner out after enjoying your new product or experience.
Re:The Joys Of Being A Late Adopter (Score:2)
Yeah, because we all know that super cheap flights have been sooo conducive to a pleasant experience. But hey, who am I to judge those that get off on being treated like the sexual playthings of perverts then crammed into a tiny tube like cattle.
Re:The Joys Of Being A Late Adopter (Score:2)
"Yes.., I paid 5 thousand dollars for a computer running on a 386 Chip and Windows 3.0 "
I paid $3000 for a PC clone running DOS on an 8088. This was before Windows 1.0 came out, and long before Windows 3.0 existed.
Re:The Joys Of Being A Late Adopter (Score:2)
"4. Again, your only earthly concern appears to be money, money, money"
Eh, in my experience people who take pride in calling themselves first adopters "only earthly concern" appears to be "ego ego ego" :-).
FYI, if you save your money by waiting, you can spend it on other things, like making donations to help improve the world.
Have a happy Friday
Re:The Joys Of Being A Late Adopter (Score:2)
Indeed, the ability to endure short-term loss for long-term gain has a high success and intelligence correlation.
Re:The Joys Of Being A Late Adopter (Score:2)
LOL!
As soon as it goes somewhere I want to go to. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:As soon as it goes somewhere I want to go to. (Score:2)
Sadly, one I had not thought of. Until there is somewhere to go, why go. Early space flights will be an airline flight to nowhere. You can reproduce this experience now.
Book a flight to whatever destination you like, and also book the first return flight you can get.
1. Inconvenience of airport/spaceport security.
2. Discomfort of airtravel/spacetravel
3. Seeing scenery you have seen photos of, or can see elsewhere.
4. Breathing recirculated air.
5. Annoying people sitting practically on top of you.
6. For an added bonus maybe you get a screaming brat.
Seems like a pretty good simulation of space travel.
Re:As soon as it goes somewhere I want to go to. (Score:2)
Re:As soon as it goes somewhere I want to go to. (Score:2)
After the thrill of a first flight, (or car journey, or bike ride) any kind of travel quickly becomes mundane.
I didn't say I'd take it again - but real zero g? Looking out into space? I'd go just for the trip. I know you can see a space-like sky from a very high altitude airplane as well as take a trip on the vomit comet, but it won't be the same. Not even close. The 3-6 minutes of weightlessness of a suborbital flight just isn't nearly long enough though - even the Vomit Comet provides about 25 seconds, I want LEO.
The problem is though I have a hard time seeing the price come down far enough. The Falcon Heavy is estimated by SpaceX to lift ~50000kg to LEO for ~$100m. That quickly puts it at ~$200k for 100kg, even as bulk cargo. Even if you say the actual spacecraft you'll fly and land in is free both in weight and cost, that's still out of my league. Or well, I could technically afford it but it'd be blowing way too much money on short trip compared to many years making the down payments. And I'm guessing the actual sticker price would be at least $1M, even with a fairly established tourist industry.
The moon or Mars? You can at least double those prices just going to GEO, before you begin to think about landing, surviving on the surface and launching again. Worth more? Hell yeah, but I think we're talking "beyond my lifetime income" prices here.
Space Colonization (Score:2)
I'll sign up for space colonization. First in line, please.
Re:Space Colonization (Score:2)
Re:Space Colonization (Score:2)
Have you seen the UV index or dust on the Moon or Mars? :-)
Everywhere is pretty much like being at the beach - at very, very (very) low tide.
What do they define as space flight though? (Score:3)
Being 100km above the surface of a planet with a radius of 6000km is not what *I* personally call space. Going to the moon starts to be cool enough though :)
Re:What do they define as space flight though? (Score:2)
Being 100km above the surface of a planet with a radius of 6000km is not what *I* personally call space
If the Earth was a peach, being in LEO wouldn't even get you out of the fuzz.
When they begin .... (Score:3)
Seriously, someone must already be planning the first pr0n shoot on a Virgin* Galactic flight.
*Gotta work that into the title somehow.
Re:When they begin .... (Score:2)
Already tried, VG turned them down:
http://m.gizmodo.com/5058749/virgin-galactic-turns-down-1-million-offer-to-make-first-porn-in-space [gizmodo.com]
Re:When they begin .... (Score:2)
On the other hand, with the prestige at stake and the size of the waiting list I doubt they'd run a flight less than full for any amount of money for anyone lower than head of state status. You'd piss off way too many rich people if you extended the time customers spend wait-listed by giving other people special treatment, and I can't even imagine the rage that would come out if that said special treatment was shown to porn stars.
So either way, the lost money isn't worth it, and the lost status probably wouldn't be worth it even if the producers paid the full price of $1.2 million.
Either that or VG just has some standards. That would be cool, too.
Re:When they begin .... (Score:2)
Well, seats cost a minimum of $200,000 a piece, so a million dollars could get the porn producer five seats. SpaceShipTwo seats six, so a full load is $1.2 million, and I doubt they would run a flight at less than full capacity without being paid for the last seat, so maybe it's just money.
For $1.2 million I bet they could find a way to make a porn movie look close enough to being in space that the audience wouldn't notice that it wasn't. If they put some naked women in the movie it might help divert the audiences attention...
Re:When they begin .... (Score:2)
So either way, the lost money isn't worth it, and the lost status probably wouldn't be worth it even if the producers paid the full price of $1.2 million.
Not to mention all the re-branding they'd have to do once they were no longer 'Virgin' Galactic...
Re:When they begin .... (Score:2)
Re:When they begin .... (Score:2)
Let's see... less blood flow to the lower extremities, no way to control the movement of key fluids, thrusts which send your partner slowly drifting across the room... is this supposed to be a porno or a slapstick (ba-dum-tish) comedy?
Not saying I wouldn't watch it (for the historical value, of course!), but it would be hilariously awkward.
If there's a destination, sure (Score:3)
If it enables travelers to get to the other side of the planet in a very short time, it would be awesome
When I'm Dead... (Score:2)
.... for that is where I want my ashes to go, with some living schmuck into space and then have my ashed ejected into space. Not the urn, just the ashes. I'd like to become one with Space.
Go as a tourist? No way (Score:2)
They always ruin everything. Once the flights begin, the tourists will probably be out there getting their photographs with the space penguins and messing with their nests.
Now if the flights got cheap enough to make it practical for a non-NASA scientist to just add it as a line item to a NSF funding proposal, I'd be all over going to space to do science as part of a support team. That's how I got to spend several summers freezing my butt off in the middle of the Greenland ice sheet.
Space couldn't be any colder than that was, can it? Hope I can find my gloves...
(actually, to be serious for a moment - Greenland was a blast)
Caveat Emptor: (Score:2)
They're gonna shoot you up at thousands of miles an hour.
You'll drop like a rock back down (freefall).
The vehicles skin will encounter elevated temperatures from the atmosphere (even at this suborbital hieght).
Forget about a parachute (won't help).
And you say you want it really CHEAP?!?!!?
Re:Caveat Emptor: (Score:2)
You know there are big tanks of EXPLOSIVES in cars? And inside the engine are EXPLOSIONS!?!?
Re:Caveat Emptor: (Score:2)
It's only one component of explosive in the tank. This makes it relatively safe compared to other alternatives.
Re:Caveat Emptor: (Score:2)
No, there are not. Gasoline is not an explosive under STP conditions. Even at a perfect stoichiometric ratio (which is difficult to achieve), you only get a conflagration, not a detonation. Even in the conditions of an engine where it's pressurized, you don't get detonation (just a fast conflagration); it takes even more pressure than that to get a detonation (which you don't generally want in a car -- we call that "knock" when it occurs inadvertently).
Hollywood has given people like you this false impression of the behavior of gasoline. Cars do not and cannot explode like in the movies without the use of *actual* explosives. In the worst case, they can burn like a beast, for a long period of time (dangerous if you can't get out of the vehicle), but they cannot explode.
Re:Caveat Emptor: (Score:2)
Yeah, but there's a weeeeee difference here. ;) When early airplanes crashed, the passengers usually *survived*, and the craft -- which was buildable by just a couple people, rather than thousands or tens of thousands -- was often repairable. The first airplane trip across the United States was taken by Calbraith Perry Rogers, from September 11th to November 5th, 1911. Yeah, you read the dates right -- he crashed *sixteen times*, but rebuilt the plane and nursed his wounds (if any) each time, then got back up into the air. Try to do that with a spacecraft.
when it goes somewhere (Score:2)
LEO is not somewhere.
It's a fancy roller-coaster, with one spectacular view.
For now, it's not much better than a plane ride from New Zealand to Antarctica and back, although New Mexico's a little easier for a West Coaster who avoids TSA to reach than New Zealand.
Call me when I can emigrate off-planet.
Re:when it goes somewhere (Score:2)
I think that they are looking for people willing to go one-way to Mars.
Probably never... (Score:2)
Because you can bet your last buck that the TSA will be right there, ready to serve up an unconstitutional anal probe. I'll stick to travel modes in which my fourth amendment rights are respected.
Now, when those of us who feel that way are rounded up and given a mandatory 1-way trip on a colony ship, I'll go happily. For many reasons.
Don't Want to Go (Score:4, Insightful)
~ Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell
Re:Don't Want to Go (Score:2)
That's a great quote!
Not sure about your plan though. The really rich/powerful would probably think something along the lines of "Damn, so much stuff that I don't own/control. Yet."
At version 2.1. (Score:2)
When I'm out doing astronaut things... (Score:2)
Oblig. Airplane II quote (Score:3)
Don't miss the opportunity! (Score:2)
Missing answer regarding motion sickness (Score:2)
I'll try it when they find a cure for the form of motion sickness I get. Nausea? I wish. Instead what happens is that I feel a continuous sense of falling. Imagine being pelted with the worst fear you've ever felt continuously. Imagine the feeling of being startled, but with a continuous pump instead of a short burst. My palms have only gotten really sweaty once in my entire life--on a plane. I haven't flown since the early 90s because of this. I'm afraid I'll either black out or freak out up there, or have a stroke or something. No, dramamine doesn't help. Maybe hard drugs would help, but what's the point if you're a zombie?
If they can find a cure for that, I'm on board.
there's always (Score:2)
The Kerbal space program [kerbalspaceprogram.com] while I wait.
I thought about the cheap option but... (Score:3)
if they said the first few groups of passengers would get free trips while they work out the kinks, I don't think I'd sign up to be on that list.
Never -- tourism doesn't appeal to me (Score:2)
I might consider moving there permanently, but not as a tourist. And permanence would require some reasonable place to live.
OTOH, when I was 19 I would have gone in a flash. Perhaps even if the trip was one way.
Hayden Planetarium's list (Score:2)
In the 1950s when I was in my preteens I put my name on a list at the Hayden Planetarium of people who were interested in booking a trip to the Moon as soon as it was commercially available. I wonder if they still have the list... and how much that might be worth as a mailing list when commercial flights become available.
They don't have my email address, though, since I didn't have one then. And my postal mailing address is a little out of date.
duplicate options (Score:3)
Never (Score:2)
I think it'll probably get down to the $10,000 range in my lifetime, but I'll never do it. I can't think of anything less fun than vomiting in a metal can packed with a bunch of strangers. With that kind of money I can spend a week somewhere they put umbrellas in your drink.
Re:First Flight (Score:2)
You're not allow to go into space if you still think a food tray is relevant.
Re:First Flight (Score:2)
:) Completely deserved.
Re:First Flight (Score:2)
Show some respect, he joined before there was grammar.
Re:I have issues (Score:2)
It's like that old joke:
When I die, I want to go peacefully in my sleep - like my grandfather. Not screaming in terror, like the passengers in his car...
Re:I'd rather do something else (Score:2)
Then you will be an earth emigrant, the question is where to you will emigrate.
If you are first then you can claim the land and set up the customs office.
Unfortunately we will have to wait for warp drive to appear.
Re:Sue the aliens! (Score:3)