Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:not a fan (Score 1) 373

by niftydude (#43760705) Attached to: Review: <em>Star Trek: Into Darkness</em>

There is no "absolute position". Anything running on inertia can be said to be said to be moving at any velocity you choose depending on your frame of reference, including motionless. Now, planets don't run solely on inertia -- they orbit because of gravity. But gravity folds spacetime, which is still what you're travelling through. Plenty of good reason to think you'll end up at basically the same position relative to the barycenter of the most significant gravity sources of your point of departure.

Even if I was to suspend belief and buy this argument that you end up at the same position relative to the barycenter of the most significant gravity sources of your departure (I don't), you would still need to travel through space. Consider the situation where you travel back in time one hour. The earth is rotating - so if you started on the east coast of a continent, and arrived at the same point relative to the barycenter, you would end up somewhere in the ocean. Even if you were to travel back only in increments of 24 hours to avoid this situation - the earth doesn't spin perfectly- it has processional wobble about a tilted axis - you would end up far above or below ground - not too useful. You would still need some sort of space travel.

And things get worse the farther you go back - things like meteor collisions throughout the ages will all jiggle the Earth further and further from the original radius of orbit of the sun. If you travel through time, you will need to also travel through space at some point to get to where you want to go.

Comment: Re:not a fan (Score 1) 373

by niftydude (#43759477) Attached to: Review: <em>Star Trek: Into Darkness</em>

For me the real problem with time travel that makes it all implausible is knowing that the world would be in a completrly different location in space. Planets, solar systems, galaxies, even the known universe is constanly moving. To successfully transport through time you'ld also need to know exactly where the planet you're on will be at the exact moment you time travel, else you will most likely arrive somewhere in space.

Agreed, it is so weird that Dr Who is the only show that ever understood this! The TARDIS can travel through time and space for this very reason.

Why do other shows get it so wrong? Dr Who has been running for 50 years! Other writers should have noticed by now.

Comment: Re:Super Hot Sauce (Score 1) 288

by niftydude (#43627931) Attached to: Compared to its non-Super version, I most prefer ...
Heh, if you like those, then you need to try some incinerator extreme hot sauce some time.

It's made from a mix of pure capsaicin crystals and Moruga scorpion chilies. One drop made my eyes tear, and I almost doubled up in pain. Takes a couple of minutes after eating to hit full potency.

Excellent stuff.

Comment: Re:Walk, cycle to the store (Score 1) 417

Wow. US cities (it's infrastructure) suck really hard. Never seen a suburb in Europe hat hasn't grocery stores. I live in a rural area and the nearest supermarket is 5 min away - by foot. Granted nowadays not every tiny village has a store, but most do.

I don't live in the US - I live in Australia, and my nearest supermarket is currently 30 mins walk away. Yes our infrastructure sucks

When I lived in Europe (a village in southern Italy), there was a grocery store in the village only 5 mins away. But there was very little choice - it was more like a corner convenience store. If you wanted a proper grocery store you had to drive at least 20 mins to the nearest town.

Comment: Re:Walk, cycle to the store (Score 2) 417

If you live deep in surburbia walking isn't an option as the nearest grocery store may be more than a couple of km away. And if you are shopping for a family, cycling isn't an option because of the load you have to haul back.

But if you happen to be single and/or living within 20 min walk of a grocery store, have at it.

Comment: Re:Particular diet. (Score 4, Funny) 417

Will this grocery delivery service discriminate against "atheist" foods?

All foods are atheist. At least, I've never met or heard of any food that claimed that it believed in a god.

Feel free to provide evidence that theist foods exist - after all - extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

Comment: Re:I'm not a patent lawyer, but I can tell you thi (Score 2) 342

by niftydude (#43586961) Attached to: Lawyer Loses It In Letter To Patent Office

That's a joke, not something that actually happened.

It is apparently from a book called "Disorder in the Court: Great Fractured Moments in Courtroom History".

Blurb reads: "Sit back and enjoy a collection of verbatim exchanges from the halls of justice, where defendants and plaintiffs, lawyers and witnesses, juries and judges, collide to produce memorably insane comedy."

So it is likely a true record of the exchange.

Also because the brain is removed during the autopsy, so it doesn't even make any sense.

As someone else posted, there are many reasons the brain can arrive separate to the body in an autopsy, so that part at least does make sense.

Comment: Re:I'm not a patent lawyer, but I can tell you thi (Score 5, Funny) 342

by niftydude (#43580537) Attached to: Lawyer Loses It In Letter To Patent Office
Didn't realize it was possible. Here's an exchange I was told is from an actual court transcript. I really hope it happened as recorded:

* Lawyer: "Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?"
* Witness: "No."
* Lawyer: "Did you check for blood pressure?"
* Witness: "No."
* Lawyer: "Did you check for breathing?"
* Witness: "No."
* Lawyer: "So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?"
* Witness: "No."
* Lawyer: "How can you be so sure, Doctor?"
* Witness: "Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar."
* Lawyer: "But could the patient have still been alive nevertheless?"
* Witness: "Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law somewhere."

Comment: Re:how about store your passwords properly? (Score 2) 211

by niftydude (#43572893) Attached to: Mitigating Password Re-Use From the Other End

It also ought to be easy for LivingSocial to store passwords hashed with a secure hash designed for passwords, like scrypt (or the related bcrypt).

It's easy to blame users, but there has been no excuse for storing plaintext passwords for years now.

Yes! I can't believe there are websites out there that still don't hash passwords.

A few months ago I signed up to the website of a large health insurance provider, and they sent me an email confirmation of my account creation that included my website password in plaintext. Unbelievable.

Who writes this stuff? And who hires these people?

Comment: Re:Segway (Score 1) 331

The problem is that the people who buy it will have more of say than people who don't. There's many reasons why one might not buy one other than finding the whole thing to be repulsive. Not to mention that the people using them are selling out the rest of us.

This has always been the case across all of history. The segments of society that organize will always overwhelm the individualists. The millions of Bieber fans out there can easily shout down my opinion that his music sucks on every conceivable level. It doesn't make them more right, but they have more power than me because there are more of them. This is why organized religions are so strong, even though they mostly spout nonsense.

And there are always people who feel the need to belong, and that sharing every component of their life increases that feeling of belonging. These people don't value privacy because they can't imagine a situation where they wouldn't want to share their feelings and experiences for validation. It's what we might consider an extremely extroverted personality. But, in the future, this type of personality may become the norm - because all this social technology favors that sort, and is about to become so cheap as to be ubiquitous.

So yeah, you and I are screwed. The only good news is that if/when the singularity hits, no one will actually care what the humans are doing, because the future of science/technology/arts, etc will be completely out of our hands.

Comment: Re:Segway (Score 1) 331

It just has a bit of a creepy vibe that's hard to ignore.

Yeah - you just know it has potential to be turned to creepy uses: cute girl wearing short shorts drops her bag, bends over to pick it up, someone wearing google glasses happens to be walking by and glances over, resulting video is uploaded to upskirt fetish sites across the internet.

Or plumber shows a bit of tradesman's crack while working on something -> internet.

If these glasses start becoming ubiquitous, I have a feeling that before long people are going to start dressing a lot more conservatively.

It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because by that time I was too famous. -- Robert Benchley

Working...